<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    For one thing, it means that whenever you do a search you have to
    make a decision about whether to use the Advanced syntax or the
    regex syntax. And it appears there are situations where you <i>must</i>
    use one or the other, such as my t-shirt example, which means you
    have to be highly skilled with both. Case in point - use of
    capitals:<br>
    <br>
    Id    Query      ResultCount<br>
    1    GS2:DVD      98307<br>
    2    GS2:/DVD/   0<br>
    3    GS2:/dvd/    98307<br>
    <br>
    If you don't remember that the search string in regex must be
    lowercase, and enter the term as it actually appears in the ID, you
    may have just screwed the pooch. It's just an invitation to disaster
    because unless you are a master of both you won't realize that your
    query was malformed.<br>
    <br>
    I also mentioned that I haven't found a way to do a proximity search
    in regex. But you can only do pattern matching in regex.  So to
    pattern match on a two-word unitary phrase, I guess you have to
    include two different searches, e.g., <i>CM:("tick tock") AND
      CM:(/ti[ckqx]/) AND CM:(/to[ckqx]/)</i> to find the homonyms for
    "tick tock"?<br>
    <br>
    There are so many examples of unreliable queries - forgetting a
    colon after the field tag, or failing to use all caps for
    connectors, also give you some results and you may not realize they
    are unreliable. I have submitted a request that a malformed query be
    flagged. It might not be possible with the t-shirt example, but it
    should be possible to at least identify syntactical errors.<br>
    <br>
    Pam<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">Pamela S. Chestek<br>
      Chestek Legal<br>
      300 Fayetteville Street<br>
      Unit 2492<br>
      Raleigh, NC 27602<br>
      +1 919-800-8033<br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
      <br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/16/2024 11:44 AM, Sam Castree via
      E-trademarks wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKU8sWZsi8AHDRn0BsWJkgGMzcHrtzTye_8Q_a9cPeBOKcbEQg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:times new roman,serif"><span
            style="font-size:16px">Just curious, but is there a reason
            why that particular search would need to use regex at all? 
            Maybe I'm way off (I definitely don't claim to have mastered
            this system yet), but it seems like a..."normal" expert
            search would work just fine.  GS:"baby bonnet" or whatever.</span></div>
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:times new roman,serif"><span
            style="font-size:16px"><br clear="all">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
                data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:tahoma;font-size:medium"><span
style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"><span
                        style="font-size:16px">Cheers,</span></span></div>
                  <div
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:tahoma;font-size:medium"><span
style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"><span
                        style="font-size:16px"> </span></span></div>
                  <div
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:tahoma;font-size:medium"><span
style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"><span
                        style="color:rgb(255,102,0);font-size:12pt">Sam<span> Castree,
                          III</span></span></span></div>
                  <div
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:tahoma;font-size:medium"><span
style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"><span
                        style="color:rgb(255,102,0);font-size:12pt"><br>
                      </span></span></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:medium"><font
                      face="times new roman, serif"><span
                        style="color:rgb(255,102,0);font-size:12pt"><span><i>Sam
                            Castree Law, LLC</i></span></span></font></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><font
                      face="times new roman, serif"><span
                        style="color:rgb(255,102,0)"><span><span
                            style="font-size:12pt"><i>3421 W. Elm St.</i></span></span></span></font></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><font
                      face="times new roman, serif"><span
                        style="color:rgb(255,102,0)"><span><span
                            style="font-size:12pt"><i>McHenry, IL 60050</i></span></span></span></font></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><font
                      face="times new roman, serif"><span
                        style="color:rgb(255,102,0)"><span><span
                            style="font-size:12pt"><i>(815) 344-6300</i></span></span></span></font></div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </span><br>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at
          7:56 PM Pamela Chestek via E-trademarks <<a
            href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Indeed,
          and the help materials couldn't be more terse and the <br>
          information more difficult to find, other than not to exist at
          all. I <br>
          have yet to figure out how (if possible) to search for a
          two-word <br>
          expression, like "baby bonnet,"  using regex.<br>
          <br>
          Id    Query    ResultCount<br>
          3    GS2:(/baby/ AND /bonnet/)    2484<br>
          2    GS2:/baby bonnet/    0<br>
          1    GS2:"baby bonnet"    43<br>
          <br>
          So you're left with trying to remember two similar, but not
          identical, <br>
          search systems, including how they treat quotation marks,
          reserved <br>
          characters, capitalization, etc.<br>
          <br>
          Pam<br>
          <br>
          Pamela S. Chestek<br>
          Chestek Legal<br>
          300 Fayetteville Street<br>
          Unit 2492<br>
          Raleigh, NC 27602<br>
          +1 919-800-8033<br>
          <a href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
          <a href="http://www.chesteklegal.com" rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
          <br>
          On 3/15/2024 8:40 PM, Richard Schafer via E-trademarks wrote:<br>
          > The fact that we have to make guesses about how the
          indexes work shows how poorly the PTO has implemented and
          documented this system. I wonder if examining attorneys have
          the same poor explanation about how the indexes work. If they
          do, that's really bad. If they have a fuller explanation, what
          possible reason would the PTO have for not making that
          explanation public?<br>
          ><br>
          > Best regards,<br>
          > Richard A. Schafer | Schafer IP Law<br>
          > P.O. Box 230081 | Houston, TX 77223<br>
          > M: 832.283.6564 | <a
            href="mailto:richard@schafer-ip.com" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">richard@schafer-ip.com</a><br>
          ><br>
          > -----Original Message-----<br>
          > From: E-trademarks <<a
            href="mailto:e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com</a>>
          On Behalf Of Neil R. Ormos via E-trademarks<br>
          > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 6:19 PM<br>
          > To: E-trademarks Mailing List <<a
            href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
          > Cc: Neil R. Ormos <<a
            href="mailto:ormos-lists@ormos.org" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">ormos-lists@ormos.org</a>><br>
          > Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Regex search<br>
          ><br>
          > Pamela Chestek via E-trademarks wrote:<br>
          ><br>
          >> Can anyone explain to me why the first two search
          queries didn't give<br>
          >> me the same results as the third query? I was in
          expert mode.<br>
          >   <br>
          >> GS:/t\-shirt/    0<br>
          >> GS:/t[-]shirt/    0<br>
          >> GS:t-shirt    511200<br>
          > When the GS index is used with a regular expression
          search, the index appears to contain each of the words of the
          goods and services field in isolation.  Spaces and hyphens
          separate words, but some other punctuation does not.  Your
          regexps do not match because t-shirt does not appear as a
          single word in the index.<br>
          ><br>
          > The GS index behaves differently when used with other
          types of search.<br>
          ><br>
          >    <<a
href="https://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/2024-January/000554.html"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/2024-January/000554.html</a>><br>
          ><br>
          > And the GS2 index also behaves differently.<br>
          ><br>
          > GS2:/t[-]shirt/<br>
          ><br>
          > returns 61,341 records.<br>
          ><br>
          > I know GS2 does some sort of stemming, but I haven't been
          able to synthesize a complete explanation.  If someone has GS2
          figured it out, or knows of a document that describes its
          behavior, I hope they will explain.<br>
          ><br>
          ><br>
          > --<br>
          > E-trademarks mailing list<br>
          > <a href="mailto:E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
          > <a
href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
          ><br>
          <br>
          <br>
          -- <br>
          E-trademarks mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
          <a
href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>