<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
Have you filed an extension yet? If not I’d do that just to be safe. Wait for it to be canceled and then respond.
<div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfSignature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Dale</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>C. Dale Quisenberry </div>
<div>Quisenberry Law PLLC</div>
<div>832.680.1000</div>
<div><br>
</div>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Mar 28, 2024, at 11:28 AM, Orvis PC via E-trademarks <e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">We received an office action with multiple 2(d) cites and goods/services rejections. One of the 2(d) citations is in its grace period and is about to be cancelled for failure to file Section 8/9. Is it proper to file a simple response requesting
suspension in light of the imminent abandonment, where that response does not address the other 2(d) citations or the goods/services rejections?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>TMEP 716.02(e) suggests not, but I swear I have done this before. </div>
<div><a href="https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/current#/current/TMEP-700d1e2495.html">https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/current#/current/TMEP-700d1e2495.html</a><br>
</div>
</div>
<span>-- </span><br>
<span>E-trademarks mailing list</span><br>
<span>E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</span><br>
<span>http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com</span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>