<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Might depend on the duration since the earlier case and the second filing, what if any relevant facts/<div>material circumstances have changed, with solid evidence. Other legal principles might prevent</div><div>second apple bite.</div><div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage"><div>
<meta charset="UTF-8"><div dir="auto" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Daniel Kegan * <daniel@keganlaw.com><br>KeganLaw * Counsel to Counsel™ * <http://www.keganlaw.com><br><div>We identify, develop, and protect intangible business assets<br>and counsel other professionals on legal issues.<br>Balanced Counsel for Smart Clients®</div>Kennett Square PA 19348-2323 USA<br></div></div>
</div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On May 13, 2024, at 10:37 PM, Carl Oppedahl via E-trademarks <e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:</div><div><meta charset="UTF-8"><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><div style="margin: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">A listserv member asks to post anonymously ...</div><div style="margin: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Is there a difference in a TTAB order wherein a proceeding is “dismissed as moot” versus “dismissed without prejudice”? With respect to “difference”, I mean terms of ability to file a new opposition if the applicant files a new application for the same mark/goods. It seems to me that there is no difference but I would appreciate others' thoughts.<o:p></o:p></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></body></html>