<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Avenir Next";}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
font-variant:normal !important;
color:#0E2841;
text-transform:none;
text-decoration:none none;
vertical-align:baseline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:11.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0E2841">Whether or not the Letter of Protest can be considered by the examiner, I think it is the only means allowable for communicating with an examiner of a third-party
application prior to being able to oppose the application. I would just submit the default judgment to the Commissioner in a Letter of Protest and let the Commissioner pass it along to the examiner if he sees fit. It is not beyond the examiner\u2019s access because
if the examiner sees your client\u2019s registration in his/her search, he/she should also be able to see the TTAB result.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0E2841"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Alex Butterman<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Partner<b>
</b></span><b><span style="font-family:"Avenir Next";color:#37428A"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Avenir Next";color:#37428A">DUNLAP </span></b><b><span style="font-family:"Avenir Next";color:#616A73">BENNETT </span></b><b><span style="font-family:"Avenir Next";color:#37428A">& LUDWIG</span></b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#156082"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:3.0pt"><i><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">211 Church St., SE; Leesburg, VA 20175<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:3.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">T: 703-777-7319</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#156082"> \u2013
</span><span style="color:#156082"><a href="https://www.dbllawyers.com/attorney/alex-butterman/"><b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">BIO</span></b></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:3.0pt"><span style="color:#156082"><img border="0" width="167" height="49" style="width:1.7416in;height:.5083in" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.png@01DAD2E8.2EBE25B0" alt="A blue and white logo
Description automatically generated"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:3.0pt"><a href="https://www.dbllawyers.com/empowering-innovators/"><span style="color:#0E2841;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="300" height="50" style="width:3.125in;height:.525in" id="Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image002.png@01DAD2E8.2EBE25B0"></span></a><span style="color:#156082"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#156082">This electronic message contains information from Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC and may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, or use of the contents is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#0E2841"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0E2841"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Adam Sikich via E-trademarks<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, July 10, 2024 5:57 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Adam Sikich <asikich@dunnerlaw.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXT] [E-trademarks] Enforcing a TTAB Default Judgment<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our client petitioned to cancel a registration based on likelihood of confusion. The client obtained a default judgment after the registrant failed to Answer. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We now have learned that the (former) registrant refiled the same mark for the same goods. The Examiner does not appear to know about the default judgment. Fortunately my client's registration is now blocking this new application after
examination, but I want to alert the Examiner about the default judgment. What is the best mechanism to do this? I would think a Letter of Protest, but my client's situation is not one of the examples provided in the instructions. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Adam<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Adam W. Sikich, Esq.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Senior Counsel<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">DUNNER LAW PLLC<br>
3243 P Street, N.W.<br>
Washington, D.C. 20007<br>
703-776-9951 (o)<br>
<a href="http://www.dunnerlaw.com" target="_blank">www.dunnerlaw.com</a><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>