<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Thank you Ken for posting.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/7/2025 1:42 PM, Ken Boone via
E-trademarks wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DM6PR14MB2235F7CBE8D2CC6EC4BADFDFD5F12@DM6PR14MB2235.namprd14.prod.outlook.com">
<div class="elementToProof">
As you likely guessed, the other 20 live/dead mismatches for the
65 older dead registrations of the 81 series were
<i>corrected </i>on Trademark Search on February 1st (the next
day). Well, sort of, but I'm sure you'll agree that the
corrections performed were incomplete.</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
The search <b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) </b>still
retrieves those 65 older dead registrations of the 81 series.
The search
<b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) AND LD:false </b>confirms
all 65 are now dead, but the search
<b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) </b><span><b>AND
LR:true</b></span> retrieves 20 of those 65 older dead
registrations of the 81 series. Somehow, the
<b>LR <i>(Live Registration</i></b><i> </i><b><i>field)</i></b> still
considers 20 of those older dead registrations to be
<b>live</b>. </div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
Double-checking, the search <b>LR:true</b> retrieves 3,408,5<span>61</span> supposedly
live registrations, but the search
<b>LD:true AND RN:*</b> retrieves only 3,408,5<span>41</span> live registrations,
and the search
<b>LR:true</b> <b>NOT</b> ( <b>LD:true AND RN:* ) </b>retrieves
the 20 live/dead mismatches.</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
Wait! Here's another weird result. The search <b>SA:(
"cancelled - restored to pendency" ) AND UD:[</b><span><b>20<u>23</u>1101
TO 20<u>23</u>1109</b></span><b>]</b> retrieves those 20
mismatches. It's like the USPTO is went back in time to early
November 2023 to fix those last twenty <b>SA:( "cancelled -
restored to pendency" )
</b>trademarks.</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
Below are the relevant lines from my search history. (The first
5 searches of the session were about something else.)</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<table id="table_0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>Id</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="elementToProof">
<span>Query</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>ResultCount</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
6</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="elementToProof">
LR:true AND MD:unknown</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
21</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
7</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND MD:unknown AND RN:*</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
8</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND MD:unknown AND PO:*</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
9</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" )</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
65</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
10</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) AND LD:true</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
0</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
11</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) AND LD:false</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
65</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
12</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) AND LR:true</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
13</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LR:true</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
3408561</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
14</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND RN:*</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
3408541</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
15</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LR:true NOT ( LD:true AND RN:* )</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
16</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
UD:20250201 AND ( LR:true NOT ( LD:true AND RN:* ) )</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
0</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
17</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
UD:[20250201 TO *] AND ( LR:true NOT ( LD:true AND RN:*
) )</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
0</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
18</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
UD:[20250101 TO *] AND ( LR:true NOT ( LD:true AND RN:*
) )</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
0</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
19</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
UD:[20250101 TO *] AND SA:( "cancelled - restored to
pendency" ) </div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
45</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
UD:[20241201 TO *] AND SA:( "cancelled - restored to
pendency" )</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
45</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
21</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) NOT UD:*</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
0</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
22</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) NOT
UD:[20241201 TO *]</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
23</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) NOT
UD:[20241001 TO *]</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
24</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) NOT
UD:[20240101 TO *]</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
25</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) NOT
UD:[20231101 TO *]</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
0</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
26</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) NOT
UD:[20231110 TO *]</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
27</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" ) AND
UD:[20231101 TO 20231109]</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
BTW, the extra trademark for the 1<sup>st</sup> search <span>
<b>(LR:true AND MD:unknown)</b></span> is 76140440, the
trademark</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<u><img alt="Image for 76140440, select for more details"
moz-do-not-send="true"></u></div>
<div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
that somehow became a live registration despite having the <b>unknown
</b>mark drawing code. Conveniently, it was last updated before
6 December 2024, so it has yet to have its wordmark entry
deleted from Trademark Search. The description of mark is
<span><b><i>the mark consists of of the word IRINOX in stylized
letters</i></b></span>, so the
<b>stylized text </b>mark drawing code appears to be
appropriate.</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof" id="Signature">
<div>
________________________________________</div>
<div>
Ken Boone</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
PS - Another curiosity. Today, the following <b>standard
character mark</b> appeared on Trademark Search.</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<u><img
alt="previously viewed
Image for 79414775, select for more details"
moz-do-not-send="true"></u></div>
<div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
I'm guessing the wordmark entry will surprise you, so you'll
have to solve the puzzle of performing the appropriate
wordmark search to retrieve this new standard character mark.
Good luck.</div>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<hr>
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><span><b>From:</b> E-trademarks
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a> on behalf of
Ken Boone via E-trademarks
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, January 31, 2025 6:53 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> For trademark practitioners. This is not for
laypersons to seek legal advice.
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Ken Boone <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:boondogles@hotmail.com"><boondogles@hotmail.com></a>;
TMFeedback <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tmfeedback@uspto.gov"><tmfeedback@uspto.gov></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [E-trademarks] Trademark Search Vs TSDR
Live/Dead Mismatches - 65 Older Dead Registrations Via SA:(
"cancelled - restored to pendency" )</span>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
Breaking News: Today's update to Trademark Search <b><i>corrects
</i></b>the status of
<b><u>45</u></b> of the 65 older dead registrations of the 81
series from <span>
<b>live</b> </span>to <span><b>dead</b></span>.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
The search <span><b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" )</b></span> still
retrieves the 65 older dead registrations of the 81 series (in
that TSDR and the retired TESS both showed these 65 trademarks
as dead), so the status descriptions in the SA field on
Trademark Search do not appear to have changed, but 45 of those
65 trademarks now appear as either
<span>DEAD</span> or
<span>DEAD</span><span>
</span><span>CANCELLED</span> on the results list presented by
Trademark Search. Here's a snapshot.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<img id="x_image_0" width="874" height="175"
data-outlook-trace="F:2|T:2"
src="cid:part1.DyXeo43y.Ndx0k4tl@oppedahl.com" class=""></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
The status changes to these 45 trademarks appears to be unique
to Trademark Search, as I cannot see any evidence of any changes
to the trademark records on TSDR for these 45 trademarks
retrieved by the
<span><b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" )
</b></span>search.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
I'll admit that this is NOT the update that I expected. I
expected all 65 trademarks retrieved by the
<span><b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" )</b></span><b>
</b>search to have the same status on Trademark Search, but now
Trademark Search shows the 3 different status conditions
<span>DEAD</span> or
<span>DEAD</span><span>
</span><span>CANCELLED</span> or
<span>LIVE</span><span>
</span><span>REGISTERED</span> as captured in the snapshot
above.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Exporting the 65 trademarks for the <span><b>SA:( "cancelled -
restored to pendency" )
</b></span>search from Trademark Search, my checks show only 9
have GS entries, only 13 have filing dates, only 35 have IC
entries, and only 30 have owner data. As the snapshot provided
demonstrates, multiple trademarks lack drawings.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div id="x_Signature">
<div>
Happy Trademarking,</div>
<div>
Ken Boone</div>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<hr>
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><span><b>From:</b> E-trademarks
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a> on behalf of
Ken Boone via E-trademarks
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, January 13, 2025 5:20 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:E-Trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com">E-Trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Ken Boone <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:boondogles@hotmail.com"><boondogles@hotmail.com></a>;
TMFeedback <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tmfeedback@uspto.gov"><tmfeedback@uspto.gov></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [E-trademarks] Trademark Search Vs TSDR
Live/Dead Mismatches - 65 Older Dead Registrations Via SA:(
"cancelled - restored to pendency" )</span>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
This past weekend, I resolved (at least to my satisfaction) the
<b>SA - Status</b> search for
<b><u>65 dead trademarks</u></b> in the 81 series that appear
(in error) as live registrations on Trademark Search, a search
puzzle simply because Trademark Search does NOT display the text
of the SA - Status field. With pit bull persistence, I found
that the search <span><b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to
pendency" )
</b></span>retrieves those 65 trademarks, all live
registrations on Trademark Search but having the status
<span><b><i>registration cancelled as inadvertently issued</i></b></span> on
TSDR. Of the two status text strings, only the term
<span><b><i>cancelled</i></b></span> is common to both Trademark
Search and TSDR, but it is somewhat reassuring that the search
<span><b>SA:( "cancelled - restored to pendency" )</b></span> retrieves
exactly the 65 live/dead mismatches and no other trademarks.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
I reported these 65 live/dead mismatches at least as early as 23
September 2023 (478 days ago) during the Beta testing of the
replacement system for TESS that is now known as Trademark
Search. </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
In October 2023, the following message appeared on the USPTO
website.</div>
<div>
<div>
<span><i>info</i></span></div>
<div>
<span><i>We\u2019re aware that in a small number of cases, the
status shown in the new Trademark Search differs from the
Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system.
This is because we\u2019re maintaining a legacy system,
Trademark Reporting And Monitoring (TRAM), as well as an
updated one, and the issue will resolve when we retire
TRAM next year. Please use TSDR to verify status in the
meantime.</i></span></div>
</div>
<div>
Yet those 65 trademarks continue to appear as live registrations
on Trademark Search today. Maybe the
<i>legacy</i> TRAM is resisting retirement?</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
The drawing for 81234899 is particularly relevant. It appears to
be a scan of the registration certificate of the Bound Volumes,
except the
<span>
INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION</span> stamp across the
drawing likely appears in
<span><b>RED INK</b></span> in the Bound Volumes (though I'm not
on the USPTO campus to check, assuming the Bound Volumes still
exist). </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<img alt="Trademark image" id="x_x_image_0" width="324"
height="276" moz-do-not-send="true"></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div><span>Of course, the SA - status text
</span><span><b>cancelled - restored to pendency
</b></span><span>is inaccurate. If these registrations really
were restored to pendency, the registration numbers (and
registration dates) would have been removed from the
electronic records.</span></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Meanwhile, TSDR still show no correspondence for these 65 dead
registrations - that if they were still pending applications in
the 1980s, they would have long been declared dead for lack of
maintenance.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
My 23 September 2023 email includes another error reported,
namely</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
But here's an unexpected twist in my analyses: <b>Using the
multi-search feature of TSDR (max 25 records at a time), the
TSDR summary list shows these trademarks
<u>live registrations</u>.</b> Huh? So then I toggle to the
individual TSDR display screen for a few of these records see
the status</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<b>Registration cancelled as inadvertently issued.</b></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
which is the actual status that I anticipated. <b>So why did
the TSDR multi-search summary screen show these 65 trademark
records as live?
</b> (Yes, some have drawings, but many are missing the filing
date.)</div>
<div>
</div>
<div><span>By my checks today, that
</span><span><b>multi-search feature of TSDR</b></span><span> error
still occurs - that when searching these 65 live/dead
mismatches using TSDR's multi-search feature, the summary
listing still show these dead registrations as live. Hmmm. </span></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div><span>The other error in the PS section - that Trademark
Search retrieved 73 trademarks when searching the 65 serial
numbers with the SN: field tag - was presumably a syntax error
for not including ( ) parentheses for that search (where the
parentheses were unnecessary on TESS. That is, the search
</span><span><b>SN:( 81029001 81046286 81068511 81119026
81135345 81141270 81142298 81144258 81148938 81148965
81153874 81157696 81161075 81162511 81169788 81172990
81182785 81190021 81191287 81201612 81202177 81209948
81213150 81217396 81218266 81221500 81225989 81226495
81231106 81231573 81234898 81234899 81234913 81236269
81238786 81239826 81242794 81242795 81242796 81242797
81242798 81242799 81245286 81245554 81245788 81246567
81247129 81248082 81248913 81248914 81251116 81254327
81256798 81261057 81261352 81265167 81268153 81274276
81276980 81284569 81286541 81288543 81297076 81299540
81337716 )</b></span><span> retrieves exact 65 trademarks,
the same 65 trademarks as the <b>SA:( "cancelled - restored
to pendency" )</b> search. I guess that was my search
error, except no one from the USPTO bothered to reply with the
proper search syntax with parentheses for Trademark Search for
a list of serial numbers.</span></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div id="x_x_Signature" class="x_x_elementToProof">
<div>
Happy Trademarking,</div>
<div>
Ken Boone</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<hr>
<div>
<b>From:</b> E-trademarks
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a> on behalf of
Ken Boone via E-trademarks
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, September 23, 2023 12:05 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:E-Trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com">E-Trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com"><e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Ken Boone <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:boondogles@hotmail.com"><boondogles@hotmail.com></a>;
TMFeedback <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tmfeedback@uspto.gov"><tmfeedback@uspto.gov></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [E-trademarks-L] More TESS Classic Versus TESS
Beta Inconsistencies (Plus A TSDR Multi-Search Hiccup)</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Below, I recorded the counts of live records for each series
(first 2 digits of the serial numbers) for TESS Classic versus
TESS Beta. All searches were performed today.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>TESS Classic</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Hits</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>TESS Beta</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Hits</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Match</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Diff</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 70000000 < 71000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
60</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 70*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
60</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 71000000 < 72000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
7,202</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 71*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
7,202</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 72000000 < 73000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
18,002</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 72*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
18,002</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 73000000 < 74000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
57,645</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 73*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
57,645</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 74000000 < 75000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
64,207</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 74*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
64,207</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 75000000 < 76000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
87,527</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 75*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
87,527</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 76000000 < 77000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
118,018</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 76*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
118,018</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 77000000 < 78000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
168,907</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 77*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
168,907</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 78000000 < 79000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
140,911</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 78*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
140,911</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>`SN >= 79000000 < 80000000 not dead[ld]</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>208,815</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>LD:true AND SN: 79*</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>208,816</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>No</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span> 1</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 80000000 < 81000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
2</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 80*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
2</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>`SN >= 81000000 < 82000000 not dead[ld]</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>14</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>LD:true AND SN: 81*</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>79</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>No</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span> 65</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 85000000 < 86000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
223,813</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 85*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
223,813</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 86000000 < 87000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
314,386</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 86*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
314,386</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>`SN >= 87000000 < 88000000 not dead[ld]</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>540,112</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>LD:true AND SN: 87*</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>540,111</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>No</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span> 1</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>`SN >= 88000000 < 89000000 not dead[ld]</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>563,439</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>LD:true AND SN: 88*</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>563,438</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>No</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span> 1</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 89000000 < 90000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
3,000</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 89*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
3,000</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>`SN >= 90000000 < 91000000 not dead[ld]</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>613,207</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>LD:true AND SN: 90*</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>613,202</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>No</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span> 5</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
`SN >= 97000000 < 98000000 not dead[ld]</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
789,763</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LD:true AND SN: 97*</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
789,763</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Yes</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
- </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>`SN >= 98000000 < 99000000 not dead[ld]</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>183,295</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>LD:true AND SN: 98*</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>183,498</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>No</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span> 203</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5">
<div>
<span>Total Mismatches</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span> 276</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
For TESS Classic, I was able to construct the searches in a
spreadsheet, copy/paste all the searches to the search screen
(to perform all the searches at one time), then copy/paste the
session summary back to my spreadsheet, making that portion of
the above summary table simple. That is, I recommend that
TESS Beta include both a multi-search option (e.g., separate
multiple searches by semicolons like in TESS Classic) and
generate a session summary with the searches and hit counts
that searchers can copy/paste to emails or spreadsheet as
records of the searches and search results.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
The <b>Diff</b> column (far right column) is just the
absolute value of the differences between search results for
the two search systems, Obviously, this is just the MINIMUM
number of mismatches for live trademarks between the two
systems per series. </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Since the hit counts for the 81 series are low, I went to the
trouble to identify the 65 live records that appear on TESS
Beta but are
<b><u>not live</u></b> on TESS Classic, namely</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<b>81029001 81046286 81068511 81119026 81135345 81141270
81142298 81144258 81148938 81148965 81153874 81157696
81161075 81162511 81169788 81172990 81182785 81190021
81191287 81201612 81202177 81209948 81213150 81217396
81218266 81221500 81225989 81226495 81231106 81231573
81234898 81234899 81234913 81236269 81238786 81239826
81242794 81242795 81242796 81242797 81242798 81242799
81245286 81245554 81245788 81246567 81247129 81248082
81248913 81248914 81251116 81254327 81256798 81261057
81261352 81265167 81268153 81274276 81276980 81284569
81286541 81288543 81297076 81299540 81337716</b></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
By my quick checks, none of those 65 serial numbers appear on
TESS Classic, not even as dead records. </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
But here's an unexpected twist in my analyses: <b>Using the
multi-search feature of TSDR (max 25 records at a time), the
TSDR summary list shows these trademarks
<u>live registrations</u>.</b> Huh? So then I toggle to
the individual TSDR display screen for a few of these records
see the status</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<b>Registration cancelled as inadvertently issued.</b></div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
which is the actual status that I anticipated. <b>So why did
the TSDR multi-search summary screen show these 65 trademark
records as live?
</b> (Yes, some have drawings, but many are missing the filing
date.)</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>#</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>SN</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>FD</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>RN</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Word Mark</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Status</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
1</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81029001</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
08/02/1973</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1029001</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
2</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81046286</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1046286</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
GIF-02</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
3</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81068511</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
05/13/1976</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1068511</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
4</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81119026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
07/05/1977</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1119026</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
5</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81135345</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1135345</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
BAGELMANIA</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
6</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81141270</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1141270</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ULTRALITE</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
7</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81142298</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
04/28/1978</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1142298</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
8</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81144258</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
06/08/1978</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1144258</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
GUTS</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
9</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81148938</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
02/01/1979</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1148938</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
10</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81148965</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
05/15/1979</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1148965</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
11</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81153874</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
11/27/1978</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1153874</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
GATEWAYS TO S\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
12</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81157696</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1157696</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
DIET WHIPPED</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
13</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81161075</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
07/16/1979</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1161075</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
14</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81162511</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
01/28/1980</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1162511</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
CHEMIHOE</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
15</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81169788</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1169788</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
TL</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
16</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81172990</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1172990</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
TEMPORALDISPE\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
17</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81182785</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1182785</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ARC-STRANGLER</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
18</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81190021</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1190021</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
PRO SKYER</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
19</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81191287</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
05/15/1981</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1191287</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
BRIDGEMAN'S</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
20</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81201612</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1201612</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
TOSHIBA</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
21</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81202177</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1202177</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
LA MONEGASQUE</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
22</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81209948</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
01/01/1978</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1209948</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
23</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81213150</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1213150</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
VALCAN CAL-STAT</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
24</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81217396</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1217396</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SOLAR</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
25</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81218266</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1218266</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SOLAR</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
26</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81221500</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1221500</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
A.M.L.</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
27</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81225989</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1225989</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
V & S VARIETY S\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
28</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81226495</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1226495</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
FOR TRUE GROU\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
29</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81231106</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1231106</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SHEERPLAS</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
30</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81231573</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1231573</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
JUPON</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
31</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81234898</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1234898</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
WHAT'S BUGGIN\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
32</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81234899</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1234899</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
33</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81234913</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1234913</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
FASTRAC</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
34</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81236269</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1236269</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC BOOKMAN</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
35</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81238786</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1238786</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ARMILLA</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
36</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81239826</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1239826</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
CTS</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
37</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81242794</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1242794</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC LUBALIN GR\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
38</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81242795</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1242795</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC AVANTGARD\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
39</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81242796</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1242796</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC FRANKLIN G\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
40</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81242797</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1242797</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC FENICE</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
41</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81242798</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1242798</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC ZAPF CHANC\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
42</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81242799</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1242799</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC NOVARESE</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
43</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81245286</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1245286</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
BOLT</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
44</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81245554</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1245554</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
COOKIE HOUSE</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
45</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81245788</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1245788</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ASPI-VENIN</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
46</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81246567</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1246567</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
THE SUPER SPUD</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
47</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81247129</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1247129</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
SOCK SICLES</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
48</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81248082</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1248082</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ION</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
49</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81248913</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1248913</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC BENGUIAT C\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
50</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81248914</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1248914</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC BENGUIAT G\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
51</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81251116</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1251116</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC AVANT GARD\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
52</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81254327</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1254327</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
CARBO-MIX</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
53</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81256798</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1256798</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
STUMPJUMPER</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
54</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81261057</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1261057</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
MRS. GOODHAM\u2026</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
55</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81261352</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1261352</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
GRAND VELOUR</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
56</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81265167</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1265167</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
FIRINO-MARTELL</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
57</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81268153</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1268153</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
PACE</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
58</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81274276</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1274276</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ITC CHELTENHAM</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
59</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81276980</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1276980</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ECCO MILANO</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
60</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81284569</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1284569</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
MINIBANK</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
61</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81286541</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1286541</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
THE GALLEY</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
62</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81288543</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1288543</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
ENCO</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
63</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81297076</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1297076</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
MCDONALD'S</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
64</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81299540</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1299540</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
GLADIATOR</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
65</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
81337716</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
10/15/1984</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
1337716</div>
</td>
<td>
<br>
</td>
<td>
<div>
live</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Given the differences in hit counts for the various series,
perhaps a similar review of dead trademark records for each
series should be performed? Alas, I've spent far more time on
this analysis and now I'm too tired to continue ....</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Happy Trademarking,</div>
<div>
Ken Boone</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
PS - Another hiccup that I was too tired to analyze. I took
the list of 65 inconsistencies above and constructed the TESS
Beta search</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
SN: 81029001 81046286 81068511 81119026 81135345 81141270
81142298 81144258 81148938 81148965 81153874 81157696 81161075
81162511 81169788 81172990 81182785 81190021 81191287 81201612
81202177 81209948 81213150 81217396 81218266 81221500 81225989
81226495 81231106 81231573 81234898 81234899 81234913 81236269
81238786 81239826 81242794 81242795 81242796 81242797 81242798
81242799 81245286 81245554 81245788 81246567 81247129 81248082
81248913 81248914 81251116 81254327 81256798 81261057 81261352
81265167 81268153 81274276 81276980 81284569 81286541 81288543
81297076 81299540 81337716</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
to double check my work, except that rather long search
returns 73 records, not 65 records. Huh? Here's the text
summary</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
73 results for SN: 81029001 81046286 81068511 81119026
81135345 81141270 81142298 81144258 81148938 81148965 81153874
81157696 81161075 81162511 81169788 81172990 81182785 81190021
81191287 81201612 81202177 81209948 81213150 81217396 81218266
81221500 81225989 81226495 81231106 81231573 81234898 81234899
81234913 81236269 81238786 81239826 81242794 81242795 81242796
81242797 81242798 81242799 81245286 81245554 81245788 81246567
81247129 81248082 81248913 81248914 81251116 81254327 81256798
81261057 81261352 81265167 81268153 81274276 81276980 81284569
81286541 81288543 81297076 81299540 81337716</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
So how does TESS Beta find 73 records for 65 serial numbers?
Well, hits #65 through #71 are 73-series records, and hit #73
is sn 85281559 (85 series). Weird, huh, or does that TESS
Beta search work correctly for you? (Again, it would be NICE
if I could do copy/paste of those 73 records directly from the
TESS Beta hit list to this email, put prior attempts for
copy/paste like that yielded UgLy results.</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>