<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Calibri Light";
        panose-1:2 15 3 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">\u201c- </span>and I don't see how anyone other than a lawyer blinded by greed might see likelihood of confusion here\u201d<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I can come up with a hypothetical scenario:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dirt Candy (the farm) sells produce that unfortunately leads to an outbreak of E. coli, salmonella or listeria.&nbsp; Many people are sickened.&nbsp; Perhaps a child or pregnant woman dies.&nbsp; Even though this happens in Texas, it makes the national
 news.&nbsp; Naïve customers in NY associate the produce-based restaurant with the farm, and reservations drop off. &nbsp;&nbsp;It could take a long time to win back trust, due to an unfortunate situation that the restaurant had no relationship with.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Sharon Rubin</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri Light&quot;,sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif"> Daniel Feigelson &lt;djf@4d-ip.com&gt;
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, February 16, 2025 3:04 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. &lt;e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com&gt;<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Sharon Rubin &lt;Sharon@gjip.com&gt;<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [E-trademarks] Dirt Candy TM Dispute<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><img width="1" height="1" style="width:.0104in;height:.0104in" id="_x0000_i1025" src="https://gcfagjf.r.bh.d.sendibt3.com/tr/op/-8UMP1zYXn27DszhWbSeSNvVzsfucPTKmH5XOoxfo-dACAfcyUWoksT1_HQeJ2Iof9ZXEpDp3AeCXrKL4UwIHXe2RAl659pHlJYYRvLmcdCMo6K-PbWPnx7QaTUNPjI5KQzdN4FGAya72_Yb6J1jL_qOGCvIx96r8ZSoajkDkbY3UsOHmAMkkwmDXMu8DhzL7b9AQh7sNzh1"></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Why not file for declaratory judgment of non-infringement in TX? Get a friendly local jury, force the other party to travel...if the restaurant owner really felt there was infringement - and I don't see how anyone other than a lawyer blinded
 by greed might see likelihood of confusion here - and that somehow her NY restaurant would be hurt because a small farm half a continent away was using the same name, maybe she'd be willing to pay for the process, and maybe not.&nbsp;
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Seems to me that that route, while certainly more expensive than trying to get a TM registration, stood a much better chance than trying to get a registration (which, even if obtained, wouldn't have disposed of the restaurant owner's claim).
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 2:16<span style="font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,sans-serif">\u202f</span>PM Sharon Rubin via E-trademarks &lt;<a href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com">e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a>&gt; wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><a href="https://gcfagjf.r.bh.d.sendibt3.com/tr/cl/aeYqghEuYyvbKF8GjmicNd4JqPkO6A-BHaij7Idp8eh3_wsjjemoMJkHMPNrmXrSyFVyVH3lBz3Am7UUOHTXmkSJBwOP5CJT6TIDKzoZo6Y6t5McwDbyK80NLPnh-y6JQS4xO_55P606fG79p8LyZrBSqbKhmfpl4PIshaSGgxBTp-FkyL72Bf57JCh32YM4UWqLKNqaMxXPaWMpAS-zGJsSQ01yNWH-855vr6Nb84JXIvgcIezC50wwLnWjRXnJXAVX9fwu2lmvQWvRU9DZQAIs7Ya1IBT2oqxOgv6huhQwuNWTbrX-H4wPaZ_f47Z6uLn3h-H9xOapPdoU4wJx9F1WPkRJHTEaORjdgib66_Sufe1o3v9v_bMtkykFzgVcuOU7kXtSaziT1HS9wYCoO8D0utq49hOyUrXrbG94K9bhAQSIPiUl" target="_blank">https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/dining/dirt-candy-trademark-dispute.html?unlocked_article_code=1.w04.fGgw.Q_EsP0DNVdUQ&amp;smid=url-share</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Sharon Rubin</span></b>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>