<div dir="ltr"> Good afternoon Greg<div><br></div><div>Thank you for sharing this information. Does anyone know how one may overcome this ( nonsensical) rebuttable presumption? </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 2:13\u202fPM Greg William via E-trademarks <<a href="mailto:e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com">e-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>(Apologies in advance to any equine aficionados, but I'm gonna beat the dead horse.). </div><div><br></div><div>I don't believe this specific point has been discussed here, but after speaking with someone at the USPTO I wanted to bring it to everyone's attention. If the street address listed as domicile in an application is flagged by the USPTO's address verification software/service as being associated with, <i>e.g.</i>, a mail delivery address, it doesn't matter if a floor/suite number is also included when the application is filed. Basically, if <i>any</i> occupant of a commercial building is a coworking space or mail service (and the USPTO's verification system knows that), it creates a rebuttable presumption that the address is impermissible for use as a domicile by <i>any other</i> occupants..</div><div><br></div><div>Discuss.</div><div><br></div><div>-Greg</div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><br>Gregory S. William, Esq.*<br>Danielson Legal LLC<br>One Mifflin Place, Suite 400<br>Cambridge, MA 02138<br>w: <a href="http://www.danielsonlegal.com" target="_blank">www.danielsonlegal.com</a><br>e: <a href="mailto:greg@danielsonlegal.com" target="_blank">greg@danielsonlegal.com</a><br>t: (617) 714-9579<br>direct: (508) 865-2204<br>f: (888) 742-8097<br><br>*Licensed to practice in Massachusetts</div><div dir="ltr"><br>This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.<br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
-- <br>
E-trademarks mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">E-trademarks@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
<a href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div>