<div dir="ltr"><div>Howdy All, </div><div>I'm dealing with a brand new (< 1 year) examining attorney on a 2(d) refusal. I argued that the blocking registration is very weak because of a substantial number of identical commercial uses of the registered mark by unrelated manufacturers and therefore the minor difference between our application and the blocking registration should be sufficient to avoid confusion. The examining attorney rejected the argument as a "collateral attack on the registration" that would "negate the presumption of the registrant\u2019s exclusive right to use the mark in commerce on or
in connection with the services listed in the registration." She never addressed the question of whether it is a weak mark with a limited scope of protection.</div><div><br></div><div>Am I crazy in thinking this is a total non-sequitur?</div><div>If not, would you reach out to the examiner or the manager?</div><div><br></div><div>She made this a final action so it's a real pain now.</div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:12.8px">Regards,</span><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,204)"><font color="#000000">Scott</font></span></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,204);font-size:12.7273px">Scott Landsbaum, Inc.</span></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,204)"><a href="tel:323-314-7881" value="+13233147881" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">323-314-7881</a> / f 323-714-2454 </span></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,204)">8306 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 420, Beverly Hills, CA 90211</span></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="font-size:12.8px;color:rgb(102,102,204)"><a href="http://www.scottlandsbaum.com/" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">www.scottlandsbaum.com</a> / </span><font color="#6666cc"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/</a></font><br><br style="color:rgb(102,102,204)"><font size="1" style="color:rgb(102,102,204)">NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, forward, print, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return email or by telephone at <a href="tel:%28323%29%20314-7881" value="+13233147881" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">(323) 314-7881</a>.<br><br>IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE:<span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(51,51,255)"> </span></font><font size="1" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,204)">Any discussion of tax matters contained in this or any email (including any attachments) or in any oral or </font><font size="1" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,204)">other </font><font size="1" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,204)">written communication is not intended to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax related penalties or in connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation of any of the matters addressed in the communication.</font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>