<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/11/2025 10:47 AM, Ken Boone via
E-trademarks wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DS0PR07MB10354690AE3CB0968B00C272ED509A@DS0PR07MB10354.namprd07.prod.outlook.com"><br>
<table id="x_table_0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<span>#</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>SN</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Wordmark</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Drawing</span></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<span>Comment</span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
1</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
99113838</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
DIMIQI</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<u><img id="x_image_7"
alt="Image for 99113838, select for more details"
moz-do-not-send="true"></u></div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
Considering the drawing, is this a valid STANDARD
CHARACTER MARK or a STYLIZED TEXT MARK? </div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, we look in TSDR and we see that the Trademark Office clerks
have indexed this application two ways. First, the description of
the mark:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Description of Mark: The mark consists of the stylized
wording "DIMIQI".</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Okay, so it is stylized. That's settled. But wait! We also see
these words in the TSDR record:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Standard Character Claim: Yes. The mark consists of standard
characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or
color.<br>
Mark Drawing Type: 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Seems to me they can't have it both ways. Well, somebody was
wrong at the Trademark Office. Look at this and decide for
yourself who was wrong:</p>
<p><img src="cid:part1.hD0enqJn.T3F0lHwe@oppedahl.com" alt=""></p>
<p>Oh and note that "review prior to publication" is completed! The
nameless Trademark Office people who do this review seem to act on
a hair trigger. But not in this case. They snoozed through it.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>