<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Thank you for posting.</p>
<p>Why those two weeks in particular? That's what I can't figure
out.</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/18/2025 9:06 AM, Crane, Susan via
E-trademarks wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:MN2PR18MB354443C0F4EA573EE61DD978FA16A@MN2PR18MB3544.namprd18.prod.outlook.com">
<meta name="Generator"
content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Not sure if this was discussed before
and I missed it, but has anyone noticed that essentially
none of the 1(b) marks published for opposition on June 3
and June 10 have moved to Notice of Allowance issuance?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I just did a search for the
surrounding weeks: </span></p>
<ul>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span>5/27 \u2013 3689 applications published
have \u201cAllowance\u201d in the status</span></li>
<li>
<span>6/3 \u2013 9 applications</span></li>
<li>
<span>6/10- 1 application</span></li>
<li>
<span>6/17 - 3785 applications</span></li>
<li>
<span>6/24 \u2013 4109 applications.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Has anyone talked to the impossible
to reach TAC or otherwise gotten an answer as to what is
happening with the remaining approximately 7600 1(b)
applications (less any that have been opposed or extensions
of time obtained) published on those dates?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Thanks. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Sue</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>Susan L. Crane</span></b></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>