<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Body CS\)";
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#0A2F41;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0A2F41">Are they concerned about survival of certain obligations, such as warranties and indemnity and payment? But that should be covered by a proper survival clause.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0A2F41"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">Jessica R. Friedman</span><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">Attorney at Law<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">300 East 59 Street, Ste. 2406<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">New York, NY 10022</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">Phone: 212-220-0900</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">Cell: 917-647-1884</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">E-mail:</span><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:blue"> <u><a href="mailto:jrfriedman@litproplaw.com" title="mailto:jrfriedman@litproplaw.com"><span style="color:#0563C1">jrfriedman@litproplaw.com</span></a></u></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#003366">URL: </span><u><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:blue"><a href="http://www.literarypropertylaw.com" title="http://www.literarypropertylaw.com"><span style="color:#0563C1">www.literarypropertylaw.com</span></a></span></u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#003366"> </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:blue"><img border="0" width="184" height="72" style="width:1.9166in;height:.75in" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.png@01DA717D.E1C844A0" alt="1479430908386_PastedImage"></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0A2F41"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0A2F41"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="color:black">Ip-transactions <ip-transactions-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf of asarabia2 via Ip-transactions <ip-transactions@oppedahl-lists.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, March 8, 2024 at 5:26 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>ip-transactions@oppedahl-lists.com <ip-transactions@oppedahl-lists.com><br>
<b>Cc: </b>asarabia2 <asarabia2@gmail.com><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Ip-transactions] How to manage survival of some terms of an agreement<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">I have seen a lot of trademark licenses, but have not seen that provision. I share your concern: a very bad idea which would force you to consider the possible meaning of each term which continues without the
license grant. Easier and better to take it out. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">Regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">Tony Sarabia <br>
<br>
IP Business Law, Inc.<br>
320 via Pasqual<br>
Redondo Beach, CA 90277<br>
(310)377-5171<br>
<a href="http://www.calrestitution.com">www.calrestitution.com</a> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 3/8/2024 2:07 PM, Pamela Chestek via Ip-transactions wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I'm reviewing a trademark license that someone else wrote and I see something I've not seen before and wondering why it's done this way. It's not written by an adversary, I was just asked for a second opinion
on it. <br>
<br>
The document is an agreement that includes a trademark license. There are very few other terms; it is a royalty-free license so there isn't any need for commercial terms like payment, etc. It has the standard product approval, marketing approval, termination,
and boilerplate, but nothing particularly substantive outside of the trademark license.
<br>
<br>
Upon termination, the agreement says expressly that only the license (identified by section number) terminates and "Except for any obligations in this license that expressly state they apply only during the term of this license, all provisions of this license
will survive a License Termination Event." <br>
<br>
So first off, I think the references to "license" should be "Agreement" - they've misused the word "license" to mean both the specific grant language and the document itself, so that needs to get cleaned up.
<br>
<br>
But fixing that problem, have you seen license agreements where the premise is that the agreement itself remains operative, it's only the license grant that terminates? Typically the agreement as a whole terminates and only specifically identified sections
survive. I'm a little nervous about the ways that a breaching licensee might try to claim they still get to do things that might infringe. For example, there is a section, different from the license grant, that describes how the mark should be used. Might
they claim that section didn't terminate and by implication they get to use the mark?
<br>
<br>
I'm just wondering what I'm missing. I'm thinking maybe they used an agreement that had more significant business terms (e.g., royalty payments) where you do want to make sure you continue to get those even after the license terminates?
<br>
<br>
Pam <br>
<br>
Pamela S. Chestek <br>
Chestek Legal <br>
300 Fayetteville St. <br>
Unit 2492 <br>
Raleigh, NC 27602 <br>
+1 919-800-8033 <br>
<a href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a> <br>
<a href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a> <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>