[Patentcenter] Previewing an uploaded IDS form in Patent Center hides identifying information, unlike EFS-Web
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Mon Nov 13 22:05:36 UTC 2023
The answer may be seen at
https://patentcenter-tickets.oppedahl.com/#CP139 . Someone (me) opened
an EBC ticket on this.
On 11/13/2023 2:32 PM, Judith S via Patentcenter wrote:
> I had the same experience with a POA a few days ago.
>
> The coversheet was entirely blank in preview, but filled in on download.
>
> What a load of hooey that it's a feature.
>
> On the other hand, has anyone contacted the developers?
>
> Judith
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:29 AM Jeff Lindsay via Patentcenter
> <patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> While filing an IDS on Saturday using the USPTO’s IDS
> form, PTO/SB/08a (02-18), when I previewed the uploaded file
> using a Mac (the problem occurs both in Chrome and Firefox
> browsers), the fields with identifying information in the upper
> right hand corner of the IDS form appeared completely blank. I
> checked the file, uploaded it again, and had the same result. I
> was about to redo it in EFS-Web but recalled something related in
> listserv comments, so instead of using the ‘Preview” feature, I
> downloaded the file I had uploaded and saw that what the USPTO had
> was OK. Still a time-waster and definitely not a confidence builder.
>
> I called the EBC to ask about this today. They said it’s not a bug
> but a feature. The “feature" is that preview in PatCenter
> allegedly provides the PUBLIC view, so it’s necessary to hide
> confidential information like names. Such information hiding is
> not consistently applied to other forms such as a power of
> attorney or a provisional cover sheet. Why would IDS info be
> treated this way?
>
> I told the EBC customer service rep that the EFS does not hide
> information on a document a patent practitioner has just uploaded.
> Forcing a public view filter seems improper. Preview should let us
> quickly confirm that what was uploaded looks OK. It’s a useful
> feature of EFS that is not properly implemented in the Patent
> Center. I asked if the public view is applied to other documents.
> The customer service rep told me they did not know and that I
> would have to contact the developers (emods at uspto.gov) to learn
> more. I politely asked how can the USPTO claim 100% of EFS-Web
> functionality is provided if the Patent Center doesn’t provide a
> properly working preview feature found in EFS-Web. Again, I was
> told I would need to contact the developers.
>
>
> Jeff Lindsay
> jeff at jefflindsay.com
> +1 920-257-7347
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Nov 9, 2023, at 1:49 PM, Carl Oppedahl via Patentcenter
>> <patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>>
>> And if we can please memorialize them in a place where our
>> listserv people can do some cluster analysis on it. You will see
>> some of the CP tickets where an EBC ticket number is included in
>> a CP ticket text description. Can people please look to see if
>> your situation that prompted you to call the EBC happens to match
>> an existing CP ticket. If so, then please post to ask one of the
>> editors to add your EBC ticket number to the existing CP ticket.
>>
>> If there is no existing CP ticket for your situation, then please
>> post to ask one of the editors to create a new CP ticket, and add
>> your EBC ticket number to the new CP ticket.
>>
>> On 11/9/2023 11:14 AM, James E. Lake via Patentcenter wrote:
>>> As we continue to encounter the infuriating, frequent errors in
>>> PC, it seems in our best interest to document a body count with
>>> the EBC that these errors are occurring. Below please find an
>>> example.
>>> One of the justifications for inaction by the PTO has been
>>> something like, “most users find that PC works just fine” or “we
>>> do not have reports of errors.” Well, most users encountering
>>> errors find a way to get their work done by signing out then
>>> logging back in, switching browsers, restarting the computer,
>>> clearing the cache, waiting 30 minutes, etc. etc. etc. This mode
>>> of operation appears to be completely acceptable to PTO and
>>> perhaps even expected under NWOW. It is “unfreakingbelievable”
>>> (thanks Suzannah) that users are subjected to such disdain and
>>> spend double, triple, or quadruple the time to complete the
>>> final administrative step in PTO submissions.
>>> Yes, it is a royal pain to make error reports, but it will be
>>> more of a royal pain for the present mode of operation to
>>> continue for years. Developers keep saying they cannot duplicate
>>> the errors. Maybe if they have stacks of thousands of
>>> well-documented error reports they will finally drop their lame
>>> excuse. I doubt the EBC will timely reply or send any useful
>>> info, but the point is to create a body count of real,
>>> continuing errors. Report an error especially if you are forced
>>> to file by fax or mail. Learn how to take screenshots
>>> (shift+command+s in Windows) and paste the screenshot into the
>>> email. (Tip: decreasing the window size before the screenshot
>>> helps the image fit better.)
>>> James
>>> *From:*James E. Lake
>>> *Sent:*Thursday, November 9, 2023 9:12 AM
>>> *To:*'ebc at uspto.gov'<ebc at uspto.gov> <mailto:ebc at uspto.gov>
>>> *Subject:*Blank page Patent Center
>>> I am currently unable to open Patent Center in MS Edge or
>>> Firefox or Google Chrome. After authenticating into MyUSPTO and
>>> selecting Patent Center from the menu, the web page opens with
>>> the correct URL identified in the tab, but the page is
>>> completely blank. Reloading the page does not change it.
>>> Suggestions?
>>> Screen shots attached.
>>> <image002.png>
>>> <image003.png>
>>> Tried again and received this error
>>> <image004.png>
>>> <image001.png>*/James E. Lake/*
>>> Shareholder, Randall | Danskin
>>> +1 (509) 747-2052 <tel:5097472052>
>>> www.randalldanskin.com
>>> <http://www.randalldanskin.com/>;www.linkedin.com/in/james-lake-1318b84
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/james-lake-1318b84>
>>> _________________________________________________
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the
>>> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>>> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
>>> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
>>> the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>>> communication is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to
>>> please notify us immediately by telephone at (509) 747-2052 or
>>> by return email, and delete this message forthwith. Thank you
>>> for your cooperation.
>>>
>> --
>> Patentcenter mailing list
>> Patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com
>> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com
>
> --
> Patentcenter mailing list
> Patentcenter at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231113/7aded66a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4514 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/patentcenter_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231113/7aded66a/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Patentcenter
mailing list