<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
@font-face
{font-family:Garamond;
panose-1:2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 8 3;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Goudy Old Style";
panose-1:2 2 5 2 5 3 5 2 3 3;}
@font-face
{font-family:Roboto;
panose-1:2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.m5635609185978013602m-3568678652912358489spelle
{mso-style-name:m_5635609185978013602m-3568678652912358489spelle;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Goudy Old Style",serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:11.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Goudy Old Style",serif;color:#1F497D">I’m pretty sure that the PTO’s position is that nothing said in one of the training videos can be relied upon. Such as last year when the trainer in one of the PTO’s “how to
use DOCX” sessions said there would be a delay in implementing the surcharge, but PTO bigwigs like Seidel refused to confirm that. I think their view is nothing said in one of those training sessions is an official statement of the PTO.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Goudy Old Style",serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Goudy Old Style",serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN">Best regards,<br>
<b>Richard A. Schafer | Schafer IP Law</b></span><span style="font-family:"Garamond",serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN"><br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Goudy Old Style",serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN">P.O. Box 230081 | Houston, TX 77223<br>
M: 832.283.6564 | </span><span style="font-family:"Goudy Old Style",serif;color:#1F497D"><a href="mailto:richard@schafer-ip.com"><span style="color:#0563C1">richard@schafer-ip.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Goudy Old Style",serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Patentpractice <patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Judith S via Patentpractice<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 28, 2024 5:05 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Judith S <judith.a.s@gmail.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I missed that! Whoever got penalized, want to petition to reverse that penalty, based on this video?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Judith<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:50<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span>PM Randy A. Noranbrock via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Although, if you jump to the 40:28 mark of this helpful PTO video, you can hear the PTO answer to this very question:
<a href="https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/uspto-videos/how-file-your-patent-application-documents-docx" target="_blank">
https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/uspto-videos/how-file-your-patent-application-documents-docx</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:Roboto">“Question 4.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:Roboto">Will there be a surcharge for preliminary amendments submitted in PDF format?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:Roboto">No. Preliminary amendments can be filed in PDF format and can be included with the initial filing.”</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">-R</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">--</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#941100">Randy A. Noranbrock</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> - </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#212121"><a href="mailto:randy@ipfirm.com" target="_blank" title="mailto:randy@ipfirm.com"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">randy@ipfirm.com</span></a></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> —
Partner @ Hauptman Ham, LLP</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#212121"><a href="http://www.ipfirm.com/" target="_blank" title="http://www.ipfirm.com/"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:purple">http://www.ipfirm.com</span></a></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> -
(703) 535-7070 (direct) - (703) 518-5499 (fax)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#0433FF">Randy A. Noranbrock is admitted in VA and registered to practice before the US Patent & Trademark Office</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentcolor currentcolor">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> on behalf of Dan Feigelson via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>"For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice." <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 5:33 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>"For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice." <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>Dan Feigelson <<a href="mailto:djf@iliplaw.com" target="_blank">djf@iliplaw.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Patentpractice] DOCX penalty fee question</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;color:red">[EXTERNAL SENDER]</span></strong><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">I think the issue with the preliminary amendment was that is was filed on the same day as the application, and therefore was considered part of the original filing. As far as I
know, amendments filed after the day of filing do not trigger the penalty.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Dan<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:17<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span>AM Goldberg, Judi via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;border-color:currentcolor currentcolor currentcolor rgb(204,204,204)">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Does the DOCX requirement/$400 penalty apply to
<u>any</u> spec amendments, such as filing a replacement spec? I saw the email discussions here that the penalty fee was assessed for a preliminary amendment, so I’m wondering if we will also get hit with the penalty if we have to file a substitute spec?
Does it make a difference if the amendments are in a national phase application rather than a utility application, like it is for the initial filing (Or will they also assess the penalty fee if we file a preliminary amendment?
<span class="m5635609185978013602m-3568678652912358489spelle">Hmmmm</span>).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">PS – I took several of the USPTO’s DOCX “training” sessions, and they never mentioned having to pay the penalty for anything other than the originally
filed spec. Why am I not surprised. </span><span style="font-family:Wingdings;color:black">L</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Thanks in advance,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Judi</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">--
<br>
Patentpractice mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gcfagjf.r.bh.d.sendibt3.com_tr_cl_OjTkX16SzuKAxeSVN2o99LbrWA3i4ND-2DOS4AOj-2DKfxczr1Aif-5FCxQDp94ttf1U26LkX04WNeP4I0aYcbVsLg9PDBhedtUBLCPAE0xkgsloShsdnM3Hik-2D2L3tl6q14T-2DBVYHR9ut-2DyLsfvw9PUTAI5MyYP8gu4GdP8yuflHoZWwbfkHk17xZcmaRwVl8E-5FfSrrx0CXTT41unXFoNw7FvixRhkSESJNzyocsNc7vjrR9bwWU5pE5FOvrllipwGfNGZRHQcE5J2vpRPX1187A8-2DApxPq5eECwbBJp6B-5FNashbYNkjYyKLg33bw1tN1fR-5FylYz9NTRLIyRoIeXxpzKZ5G76e90ygqa4b9Wc&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=BqR0VQUVXErbEwFKisVgSVuzZx0HbJxwEUTNLj3Tx2Q&m=2z8eNcowfeElC_cdNoKIcEZd91Z6ByuSruYP8K6w_PJphORVEjlyZ5ciQ0gPDDKK&s=Fm7sT5jeXGawV46pWsgP6dsTjgVqFrhUhaUEJh2vpwI&e=" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="border:solid black 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt">
<p style="background:#FFD300"><strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;color:navy">NOTICE</span></strong><span style="color:navy"> This email message originated from outside of your organization. Please use caution when responding, opening attachments,
and clicking links.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <br>
Patentpractice mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
<a href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>