<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
If an examiner rejects the claims in a PPH application, what types of amendments are permitted?</div>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
The original notice announcing the PPH program (<a href="https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2014/week11/TOC.htm#ref12" title="https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2014/week11/TOC.htm#ref12">link</a>) says this:</div>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left: 3px solid rgb(200, 200, 200);">
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Any claims amended or added after the grant of the request for participation in the Global/IP5 PPH pilot program must sufficiently correspond to one or more allowable/patentable claims in the OEE application.</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
It defines "sufficiently correspond" as (emphasis added):</div>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left: 3px solid rgb(200, 200, 200);">
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
All claims in the U.S. application for which participation in the Global/IP5 PPH pilot program is requested must sufficiently correspond to the allowable/patentable claims in the corresponding OEE application. A claim is considered to sufficiently correspond
where, accounting for differences due to claim format requirements, the claim is of the same or similar scope as an allowable/patentable claim in the corresponding OEE application. A claim in the U.S. application that is narrower in scope than the claims indicated
as allowable/patentable in the OEE application will sufficiently correspond if presented as a claim dependent upon a claim that is of the same or similar scope as a claim indicated as allowable/patentable in the OEE application.
<b><i>In this regard, a claim that is narrower in scope occurs when an OEE claim is amended to be further limited by an additional feature that is supported by the written description of the U.S. application</i></b>.</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
This makes it sound like "sufficiently correspond" includes any amendment to an independent claim as long as it narrows the claims and is supported by the original application. However, the PPH FAQs (<a href="https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/FAQs%20-%20Global%20PPH%20-%2005212015.pdf" title="https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/FAQs%20-%20Global%20PPH%20-%2005212015.pdf">link</a>)
say this (emphasis added):</div>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left: 3px solid rgb(200, 200, 200);">
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Claim Amendments:</div>
<div style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
21. The notices regarding PPH indicate that US claims will be considered to sufficiently correspond with the claims allowed by the OEE if the US claims are of the same or similar scope or the US claims are narrower in scope than the allowed claims. The additional
limitation that makes the US claims narrower in scope than the allowed claims must be presented in dependent form. Can applicant incorporate the narrower dependent claim into the independent claim during the US prosecution if the independent claim which has
the same scope as the allowed claim was rejected by the US examiner but the narrower dependent claim was objected to as being dependent on a rejected claim?</div>
<div style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
[Answer]: If the narrower dependent claim is indicated as being allowable if written in independent form, you may rewrite the allowable dependent claim in independent form.</div>
<div style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
22. If an independent claim which sufficiently corresponds to an allowed claim in the OEE workproduct is rejected by the US examiner but may be allowable if amended to include some additional limitation, will such an amendment meet the sufficient correspondence
requirement?</div>
<div style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
[Answer] Yes, but only if the limitation was one previously presented in a dependent claim that is indicated as having allowable subject matter but objected to only because it is dependent on a rejected base claim. </div>
</blockquote>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
The FAQs make it sound like you cannot amend the independent claims but instead must add new dependent claims with the narrower limitation. When one of the dependent claims is found to be allowable, then it is permissible to amend the independent claim to include
the subject matter in the dependent claim. </div>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
So ... is it permissible to make narrowing amendments to independent claims when an application is in the PPH?</div>
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div id="Signature">
<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><span style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; color: rgb(31, 56, 100);"><b>Scott Nielson</b></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><span style="font-family: "Aptos Serif", Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, serif; color: black;">801-660-4400</span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>