<div dir="ltr"><div>Thanks, Timothy. Unfortunately, there are no PCT applications here, and they're just US nonprovisionals. And the inventors are too young to qualify for the >65 provision.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Good times. It is amazing how some art units manage to examine applications almost immediately, and others take years. I have had multiple regular nonprovisional applications issue within a year of filing and others that just sit. <br></div><div><br></div><div><div>Best regards,<br></div><div>Krista</div><div><br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div></div><div>------------------------------------------<br></div><div>Krista S. Jacobsen<br></div><div>Attorney and Counselor at Law</div><div>Jacobsen IP Law</div><div><a href="mailto:krista@jacobseniplaw.com" target="_blank">krista@jacobseniplaw.com</a></div><div>T: 408.455.5539</div><div><a href="http://www.jacobseniplaw.com" target="_blank">www.jacobseniplaw.com</a></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 3:30\u202fPM Timothy Snowden via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg-9046809718630400015">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Call AAU and Ombudsman. If any are national phase call PCT Help Desk. It's a 50-50 chance something happens, but it does happen enough that we keep doing it.</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
In the off-chance an inventor is >65, there's always that option.</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
If by any chance you have positive claims in another patent office, you can also use PPH \u2013 that has been really fast lately (sometimes faster than Track1).</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
All that said \u2013 I feel your pain. We're having this a lot. Examiners have been sympathetic but largely hand-tied by strict new internal rules on picking up applications in order of filing date, with some telling me that weekly they get new applications assigned
that have filing dates earlier than cases that have been on their docket for 6 months.</div>
<div id="m_-1100228021639898137appendonsend"></div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div id="m_-1100228021639898137divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><b>From:</b> Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> on behalf of Krista Jacobsen via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, August 8, 2024 4:20 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Krista Jacobsen <<a href="mailto:krista@jacobseniplaw.com" target="_blank">krista@jacobseniplaw.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Patentpractice] Application sitting unexamined for nearly 3 years</span>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Hi all,</div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">A client filed its first application in November 2021 and has since filed two more. All of them are just sitting there:</div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><img alt="image.png" width="140" height="116" style="width: 140px; height: 116px; margin-right: 0px;" src="cid:ii_19133f2a19dcb971f161"></div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Other than filing continuations on Track 1 (which, I learned, can result in the Track 1 examiner grabbing the originally-filed application and examining both at the same time), is there any trick to getting the USPTO to move them
along? </div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">I feel bad for the client, which is a small company that would like to get some patents to help with funding. The prospect of PTA doesn't help them at this point.</div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Thanks in advance.</div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Best regards,</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Krista</div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">------------------------------------------</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Krista S. Jacobsen</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Attorney and Counselor at Law</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Jacobsen IP Law</div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><a href="mailto:krista@jacobseniplaw.com" id="m_-1100228021639898137OWA13b1bb9a-657a-9ab2-b8b6-8ca96945a771" target="_blank">krista@jacobseniplaw.com</a></div>
<div style="direction:ltr">T: 408.455.5539</div>
<div style="direction:ltr"><a href="http://www.jacobseniplaw.com/" id="m_-1100228021639898137OWAa2d200ed-c983-aedc-05b5-7e91e21a6b2d" target="_blank">www.jacobseniplaw.com</a></div>
</div>
-- <br>
Patentpractice mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
<a href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div>