<div dir="ltr">The one thing to NEVER do -- the US PTO used to have a form assignment. It was flamboyantly incompetent -- it didn't include necessary magic words for the U.S., and it granted a license to use to the attorney! If the assignment you're using still has the language "use and behoof" and "for use of representatives" you're creating trouble!<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 9:05\u202fAM Ed Welch via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg1203272129995995260"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" lang="EN-US"><div class="m_1203272129995995260WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Perhaps WIPO should task itself with creating a \u201cuniversal\u201d assignment, which endeavors to address the critical elements/requirements of the major countries, and then seeks adoption of that assignment document by its member countries. Those that accept it are bound to it, at least with respect to an International PCT patent application and its national phase siblings; regardless of conflicting national language. The form would not be a requirement, but an option; whereby a US originated case may not adopt its use to account for state laws. Maybe I\u2019m being too simplistic!<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Ed Welch<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div><div style="border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentcolor currentcolor;border-style:solid none none;border-width:1pt medium medium;padding:3pt 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, August 21, 2024 6:23 AM<br><b>To:</b> For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br><b>Cc:</b> Carl Oppedahl <<a href="mailto:carl@oppedahl.com" target="_blank">carl@oppedahl.com</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Patentpractice] Assignment of US National Phase of foreign-origin PCT<u></u><u></u></span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p>Yes I have had such questions from foreign associates a dozen times in the past thirty years, and I am always troubled by it.<u></u><u></u></p><p>Indeed think how this kind of project could blow up. One reason it could blow up is that what is often at least implied in such a question is a hope that somehow you are smarter than anybody anywhere in the world, because you somehow know what ten or twenty sets of "magic words" need to be inserted into a proposed Assignment that would make it legally enforceable in the whole world, in every country of the world.<u></u><u></u></p><p>We already know this cannot possibly be within the abilities of any particular single practitioner, no matter how smart they are. I am told by some European practitioners that one of the requirements for an Assignment to work in some European countries is, the document is required to be signed not only by the Assignor but also by the Assignee. I am also told that in some European countries, the mere fact of the inventor drawing paychecks from an employer might mean the rights are not owned by the inventor. In which case maybe if someone were to stick a would-be Assignment under the nose of the inventor to sign might not lead to any rights being assigned because the inventor has no rights to assign.<u></u><u></u></p><p>I am told by some Japanese practitioners that in Japan, even if an American-style assignment were to be signed by a Japanese inventor, it probably does not settle the question of who owns what, because there are laws about how much compensation needs to be paid to the inventor. <u></u><u></u></p><p>Just within the US, we have questions that might make for a surprise about who owns what, questions that are state-specific within our 50 states. In California there have been cases where it made a difference whether or not the inventor was married at the time the invention was made. I am absolutely sure that I lack competency to give legal advice in Louisiana not only because I am not admitted to practice there, but because that law is based not on US common law but instead is based upon the Napoleonic Code. There is some word "usufruct" that absolutely means something super important about property rights in Louisiana (see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usufruct#Louisiana" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usufruct#Louisiana</a> ) but that does not arise in 48 other states. Whatever "usufruct" means legally in Louisiana, I lack competence to say whether it does or does not apply in any particular would-be patent assignment <u></u><u></u></p><p>Think of the Assignments that we have all seen over the years, where the drafter of the document larded it with language requiring the hapless inventor to make lots of representations and warranties that the inventor owned all rights, and was of sound mind, and had consulted counsel, and was delivering good title, and conveyed it all to the Assignee. <u></u><u></u></p><p>Think of the Assignments we have seen where the document fails to recite any consideration. Recall that in law school we were taught that depending on what jurisdiction we are drafting to meet, maybe it is required to recite consideration. Maybe we need to recite at least One Dollar? A peppercorn? Think of the Assignments we have seen where the hapless inventor is being required to make a party admission that the (unspecified) consideration is "good and sufficient". <u></u><u></u></p><p>Now maybe your request from the FA is narrower. Maybe they are only asking you to draft up a document that conveys "the US patent rights" or "the US designation from the PCT application". Even then there are things to go wrong. We have our fifty-states issue for one thing. And even a document which superficially seems to assign only US rights will often have some word-creep that sort of purports to assign "the invention set forth in" or "the invention", which sounds a lot like assigning "everything" regardless of geography.<u></u><u></u></p><p>Sometimes I sort of give up and draft up something that is a mere quitclaim deed. A document which, correctly understood and interpreted, amounts to nothing more than "who knows whether or not I have any rights in the US, but to the extent that I do, I hereby convey them". Again is a peppercorn enough? One US dollar? An unspecified "good and sufficient consideration"?<u></u><u></u></p><p>One of the nice anecdotes in "Surely you're joking, Mr. Feinman" is the place where somebody demanded he sign some patent assignment at Los Alamos, and it said he was being paid one dollar, and he said he would only sign if he actually were to receive the dollar. And of course the government bureaucracy and paperwork to carry out the payment of the one dollar took weeks or months to satisfy.<u></u><u></u></p><p>In the "Oppenheimer" movie there is the half-a-second bit of film, a throwaway quick action cut, that shows a fellow slapping away on bongo drums shortly after the big test explosion in New Mexico. That's a true story and it was Feinman.<u></u><u></u></p><p>Anyway, yes, I don't even think I could draft a document that I could promise would work in all fifty of the United States. If I don't think I could do that, how could I possibly add to the mix the need to deal with whatever is different about the law when you get to foreign countries?<u></u><u></u></p><p>I was born in a place in New Mexico that is walking distance from the place where that first big test happened. Thank goodness it was more than a decade later than the test. But occasionally a friend or relative will ask whether this geography somehow explains one or another of my personality quirks.<u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">On 8/20/2024 7:51 PM, Katherine Koenig via Patentpractice wrote:<u></u><u></u></p></div><blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt"><p class="MsoNormal">Hi everyone, <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">A FA has asked me to file the US National Phase application of a PCT application (RO/GB, with two GB priority applications). They\u2019ve also asked me to send an Assignment of the US application for signature. <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">My brain is hanging up on this for some reason \u2013 does it make sense (would it be unauthorized practice) for me to send them a US assignment of a US patent application, if the applicant and inventor are both in the UK? Would the contract be governed by UK law, and therefore I couldn\u2019t prepare it for them? I\u2019ve asked the FA for a copy of any assignment that\u2019s already been made, but I\u2019ve so far only received the request to prepare one for the US. If they\u2019re unable to send me prior assignment(s), would a better approach be to prepare a confirmatory assignment (but what if I don\u2019t know the terms of prior assignment(s))? <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">Best regards,</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">Katherine</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">Dr. Katherine Koenig</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">Registered Patent Attorney</span></i><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">Koenig IP Works, PLLC</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">2208 Mariner Dr.</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black">(954) 903-1699</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black"><a href="mailto:katherine@koenigipworks.com" target="_blank">katherine@koenigipworks.com</a></span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Corbel",sans-serif;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black"><img style="width: 1.6041in; height: 0.4236in;" id="m_1203272129995995260Picture_x0020_2" src="cid:ii_191751697e94ce8e91" width="154" height="41" border="0"></span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:"Candara",sans-serif;color:black">Targeted Intellectual Property Strategy</span></i><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:"Candara",sans-serif;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:"Candara",sans-serif;color:black">The information contained in this communication, including any attachments, is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If </span></i><i><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:"Candara",sans-serif">you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then destroy all paper and electronic copies. Thank you.</span></i><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><br><br><u></u><u></u></span></p></blockquote></div></div>-- <br>
Patentpractice mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
<a href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:10pt"><font size="2"><b><span><span><span><span><span><span><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></b></font></p><p style="margin:0px 0px 10px;color:rgb(102,127,160);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif,Arial;font-size:12px"><font size="2"><b><a border="0" href="https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy" style="color:rgb(102,127,160);text-decoration:none;outline:none;background:transparent 0px 0px" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4wRMgBgcdZCqTw68Gg6ihENvW6_y8dGBqYvnJwiaIyu6LO5a7IJ-cljKsueIE5uxXbT6s9MN5hE2lGU" width="73" height="92"> <img alt="Cambridge Technology Law LLC" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/keynectup/PROFILE/9b92f0cd-ecec-44c8-8932-60e8dc63709f/thumbnail.jpg?1455027242552" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: none; border-color: currentcolor; outline: 0px;" width="96" height="96" border="0"><br></a></b></font></p><font size="2"><b>
</b><p style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt"><a href="https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy" target="_blank"><span style="color:windowtext;text-decoration:none">Listed as one of the world's 300 leading intellectual property
strategists</span></a></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt"><span style="color:windowtext;text-decoration:none">
</span><a href="http://ssrn.com/author=2936470" target="_blank">Articles at http://ssrn.com/author=2936470</a><a href="https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?" target="_blank"><span style="color:windowtext"><br></span></a></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt"><a href="https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?" target="_blank"><span style="color:windowtext">Click here to add me to your
contacts.</span></a></p><b>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px;color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif,Arial;font-size:14px"><span style="font-weight:700"></span></p><p style="margin:0px 0px 10px;font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif,Arial;font-size:14px"><span style="color:rgb(0,0,255)"><a href="https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight:700">David Boundy</span></a></span></p><p style="margin:0px 0px 10px;color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif,Arial;font-size:14px"><span style="font-weight:700"></span></p><p style="margin:0px 0px 10px;color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif,Arial;font-size:14px"><span><span></span></span></p></b></font><p></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px;color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif,Arial;font-size:14px"><span><span><a href="mailto:dboundy@cambridgetechlaw.com" target="_blank">DBoundy@cambridgetechlaw.com</a> / <a href="tel:%2B1%206464729737" value="+16464729737" target="_blank">+1 646.472.9737</a></span></span></p><p style="margin:0px 0px 10px;color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif,Arial;font-size:14px"><span><span><span style="font-weight:700">Cambridge Technology Law LLC</span></span><br>686 Massachusetts Avenue #201, Cambridge MA 02139<br><a href="http://www.CambridgeTechLaw.com" target="_blank">http://www.CambridgeTechLaw.com</a><br><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/DavidBoundy" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/DavidBoundy</a><br></span></p>mailing address<div>PO Box 590638<br></div><div>Newton MA 02459<br></div></div></div><font size="1"><span style="line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman""><br>This communication is
a confidential attorney-client communication intended only for the person named above or an authorized representative.<span> </span>Any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited, whether by the author or recipients.<span> </span>Any legal, business or tax information
contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not
intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues, nor a substitute
for a formal opinion, nor is it sufficient to avoid legal or other adverse
consequences to the recipient. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to
receive for the addressee), you may not copy, use, disclose or distribute this
communication or attribute to the Firm any information contained in this
communication. If you have received this communication in error, please advise
the sender by replying to this message or by telephone, and then promptly
delete it.</span></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>