<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">"put off the fight to get the fifth until it's a nonprovisional and/or PCT." Good luck proving the corporate applicant on the PCT is entitled the Paris priority date, lacking an assignment executed BEFORE the PCT filing date. Strongly suggest you read <strong style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11px"><a href="https://www.neifeld.com/pubs/Avoiding%20Failed%20Patent%20Application%20Filings,%202023%20Paper.pdf" style="color:rgb(102,0,0);text-decoration-line:none">Avoiding Failed Patent Application Filings, 2023 Paper, Submitted for the NAPP annual meeting July 19, 2023</a>" Rick Neifeld, July 19, 2023., section </strong>VI.D. The All Applicants Rule. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div>Rick</div><div><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 2:21\u202fPM Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<p>Keep in mind you need to record within three months. See
<a href="https://blog.oppedahl.com/best-practice-recording-us-patent-assignments/" target="_blank">https://blog.oppedahl.com/best-practice-recording-us-patent-assignments/</a>
. So I would not foot-drag the recordation, especially given
that you don't have to pay any government fee to accomplish the
recordation. <br>
</p>
<p>In the old days when we had to pay a government fee to record
patent assignments, I know that many of us would play a game of
chicken, aging the first four assignments, hoping against all hope
that the fifth inventor would cough up a signature within three
months of the earliest execution by the four earlier signers. All
to scrimp and save to avoid paying an extra $25. But that fee is
gone so that eliminates any good reason to foot-drag the
recordations.</p>
<p>I figure the longer one waits to extract a signature from an
inventor, the greater the period of exposure to problems like the
inventor getting run over by a truck or worse.</p>
<p>Sometimes I have run into situations where the non-provisional is
admittedly non-identical to the provisional, and I realize that to
cover the situation fully I would need two assignments -- one for
the provisional and a second for the non-provisional. And yes you
might say "assume for sake of discussion that I do manage to
extract a signature from the inventor for the non-provisional,
then surely that means I can forgive myself for having failed to
get that inventor to sign the earlier assignment for the
provisional."</p>
<p>Except at least in my own practice, every single time that I have
ever played this game (relying on a signature for the
non-provisional as the excuse for ducking the pursuit of the
signature for the provisional), I have gotten burned. Every
single time! The ways that I have gotten burned when I play this
game have fallen into several categories:</p>
<ul>
<li>I run afoul of Article 4 of Paris, risking a failure to comply
with SAOSIT.</li>
<li>The inventor starts smelling blood in the water, because maybe
the invention must be really valuable given the second patent
filing, and so the inventor starts holding the signature ransom.</li>
<li>The inventor gets run over by a truck.</li>
<li>The inventor has a last day of work and is less cooperative
than before.</li>
</ul>
<p><br>
</p>
<div>On 12/19/2024 12:04 PM, David Boundy
via Patentpractice wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I am nine months into my provisional year. I have
assignment from four of five inventors. The fifth? Not
hostile, but he's just a contractor, no real loyalty to the
client. Ignores emails requesting signature.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If I just record the assignment of four inventors, and put
off the fight to get the fifth until it's a nonprovisional
and/or PCT, I guess I'm running a risk that he won't sign that
either. But is there any greater consequence to lacking the
signature if I wait? I am just out of vinegar to fight with
this guy, and I want to wait to have the fight until its a
nonprovisional.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
<span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><span>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><span>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div><span><span><span><span><span>
<p><a href="https://www.iam-media.com/strategy300/individuals/david-boundy" target="_blank"><img alt="" height="92" width="73"> <br>
</a></p>
</span></span></span></span></span>
<p>
<b><span>David
Boundy </span></b><span>|
Partner </span><span><span>|</span><span><span> </span></span></span><span>Potomac Law
Group, PLLC</span></p>
<p>
<span>P.O. Box
590638,
Newton, MA
02459</span></p>
<div>
<span></span></div>
<div>
<span></span></div>
<div>
<span></span></div>
<p>
<span></span></p>
<span></span>
<p>
<span></span><span><span><span><span>Tel
(646)</span><span> 472-9737</span></span><span> </span></span><span>|</span><span> Fax:
(202) 318-7707</span></span></p>
<p>
<span><span><u><a href="mailto:dboundy@potomaclaw.com" title="mailto:dboundy@potomaclaw.com" target="_blank">dboundy@potomaclaw.com</a></u> </span></span><span><span><u><span></span></u></span></span><span>| </span><u><a href="http://www.potomaclaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" title="http://www.potomaclaw.com/" target="_blank"><span>www.potomaclaw.com</span></a></u></p>
<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>
<p><span>
</span><a href="http://ssrn.com/author=2936470" target="_blank">Articles at http://ssrn.com/author=2936470</a><a href="https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?" target="_blank"><span><br>
</span></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.keynect.us/requestCardAccess/USA500DBOUN?" target="_blank"><span>Click here to add me to
your
contacts.</span></a></p>
</span></span></span></span></span>
<p><span></span></p>
</span></span><span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span><span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span><span><span></span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
</blockquote>
</div>
-- <br>
Patentpractice mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
<a href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>