<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Thank you for posting.  This is very helpful.<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/9/2025 9:22 AM, Goldberg, Judi via
      Patentpractice wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DS0PR02MB892718C3A9522607E73F2B11D7132@DS0PR02MB8927.namprd02.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15">
      <meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 15">
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Hi all,</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>I don\u2019t know if this will be helpful,
            but a couple of months back, I had a problem with the PTO
            retrieving a copy of an EP Patent from DAS via PDX. (I got a
            whole lecture on how the USPTO uses PDX and we shouldn\u2019t mix
            it up with DAS.<span> 
            </span></span><span><span>L</span></span><span>).</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Even checking in DAS, it showed the
            USPTO has successfully retrieved the document several times,
            but the file history on PatentCenter showed that the
            attempts had failed (and doesn\u2019t match up with the retrieval
            dates on DAS).<span> 
            </span></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span><img width="463" height="315"
              id="Picture_x0020_2"
              src="cid:part1.o0UxJpNv.0uZdlMyo@oppedahl.com"
alt="mailbox:///C:/Users/co/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/ud34fid8.default-release/Mail/business41.web-hosting.com/Inbox?number=198873&amp;header=quotebody&amp;part=1.1.3&amp;filename=image004.jpg"
              class=""></span><span>
            <span> </span></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span><img width="533" height="240"
              id="Picture_x0020_3"
              src="cid:part2.mu5T0jpX.E8IChW9g@oppedahl.com"
alt="mailbox:///C:/Users/co/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/ud34fid8.default-release/Mail/business41.web-hosting.com/Inbox?number=198873&amp;header=quotebody&amp;part=1.1.4&amp;filename=image006.jpg"
              class=""></span><span></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Anyway, upshot is that I had entered
            the application number in the ADS to include the trailing
            decimal, which caused the problem in retrieving the EP
            patent.<span>  </span>
            The gentleman at the PTO directed me to the attached
            document, which includes the \u201cRecommended Application Number
            Format\u201d for the priority application to be listed on the
            ADS.<span> 
            </span>Since I do mostly national phase applications,
            including (or not including) the trailing decimal on an EP
            application number hadn\u2019t come up before.<span> 
            </span></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Anyway, this may have nothing to do
            with the problems you\u2019re having retrieving the priority
            document from the JPO, but when you hear hoofbeats\u2026.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Best,</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Judi</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From:</span></b><span>
                Patentpractice
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com">&lt;patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com&gt;</a> <b>On
                  Behalf Of </b>Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 9, 2025 3:42 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
                <b>Cc:</b> Carl Oppedahl <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:carl@oppedahl.com">&lt;carl@oppedahl.com&gt;</a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Patentpractice] Difficulty with
                Priority Document Retrieval b/w JPO &amp; USPTO</span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <p><strong><span>[External Email]</span></strong></p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span>On 1/9/2025 1:37 AM, Pamela
                Brisky (Fujitsu) via Patentpractice wrote:</span></p>
          </div>
          <blockquote>
            <div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Hi</span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span>We have had several instances
                    where the USPTO has been "unable" to complete
                    electronic retrieval of priority documents from the
                    Japanese Patent Office.  The USPTO states that they
                    are receiving a message when attempting the
                    retrieval that says "no PDF file." After three
                    tries, they stop and don't make any further
                    attempts. </span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span>I've never encountered this
                    issue before the last month or so and I suspect the
                    issue is on the USPTO end.  </span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Has anyone else had this
                    happen to them? If so, what country?</span></p>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <p>And while we are on the topic ...</p>
          <p>I expect that for each of these Japanese priority
            documents, you had already set up "tracking" in DAS, right? 
            So now what you can do is click in DAS to look at the
            Retrieval History.  Here is an example of an actual
            Retrieval History:</p>
          <p><span><img width="844" height="291" id="Picture_x0020_1"
                src="cid:part3.EJAdbvgd.aFLuZAK0@oppedahl.com"
alt="mailbox:///C:/Users/co/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/ud34fid8.default-release/Mail/business41.web-hosting.com/Inbox?number=198873&amp;header=quotebody&amp;part=1.1.2&amp;filename=image002.png"
                class=""></span></p>
          <p>In this particular Retrieval History, we see that JPO, EPO,
            and USPTO each did successfully retrieve their electronic
            certified copy in November or December of 2024.</p>
          <p>So now to turn to your Retrieval History for each of your
            Japanese priority documents ... what does it say for the
            US?  Does it say that the retrieval succeeded?  Does it say
            that the retrieval failed?  
          </p>
          <blockquote>
            <div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
              </div>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>