<div dir="ltr"><div>The Examiner has to confirm that they considered it.</div><div><br></div><div>Given the statement that it was a "cursory review" already in the file wrapper, I don't see that this response does anything negative in litigation.</div><div><br></div><div>As to lining through, the Examiner doesn't get to do that because they don't feel like reviewing the references.</div><div><br></div><div>Judith<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:57\u202fPM Weitzmanip via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr">I don\u2019t see how that statement helps in a litigation - you just show that the Examiner didn\u2019t do their job, which may affect the presumption of validity. All those statements may do is cause Examiners in later similar situations to simply line out the references. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"> Am I missing something?</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"> Rich Straussman </div><div dir="ltr"><br>On Jan 28, 2025, at 7:50\u202fPM, Timothy Snowden via Patentpractice <<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div dir="ltr">\ufeff
<p>Helpful - thanks!<br>
</p>
<div>On 1/28/2025 6:35 PM, Scott Nielson via
Patentpractice wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Here
is the template response I developed the last time this issue
came up. Feel free to use it, suggest revisions, etc.</div>
<div style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<p style="margin:12pt 0cm 6pt"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><b><u>Information
Disclosure Statement\u2014Cursory Review Not Allowed</u></b></span></p>
<p style="text-indent:1cm;line-height:18pt;margin:0cm 0cm 6pt"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">The
Office Action acknowledged the submission of the information
disclosure statement dated [</span><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:aqua">date</span><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">]
but stated that the listed items were only given a cursory
review due to time constraints. Office Action, pp.
</span><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:aqua">__</span><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">.
Applicant is sympathetic to the time constraints involved in
examining a patent application. However, the applicable rules
do not permit a cursory review of information submitted in an
information disclosure statement.
</span></p>
<p style="text-indent:1cm;line-height:18pt;margin:0cm 0cm 6pt"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">The
MPEP explains that an information disclosure statement filed
in compliance with 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98 \u201cwill be considered by
the examiner assigned to the application.\u201d MPEP 609. The
\u201cexaminer has an obligation to consider the information,\u201d
which means \u201cconsidering the documents in the same manner as
other documents in Office search files are considered by the
examiner while conducting a search of the prior art in a
proper field of search.\u201d
<i>Id.</i> Initialing the item or an equivalent
acknowledgement means \u201cthat the information has been
considered by the examiner to the extent noted above.\u201d
<i>Id.</i> There is no provision for performing a cursory
review of the items.</span></p>
<p style="text-indent:1cm;line-height:18pt;margin:0cm 0cm 6pt">
<span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Applicant
will assume that the Examiner has reviewed these comments and
fully considered all the items listed in the information
disclosure statement in accordance with MPEP 069 unless the
Examiner states otherwise in a future communication.</span></p>
<p style="text-indent:1cm;line-height:18pt;margin:0cm 0cm 6pt">
<span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><br>
</span></p>
<div style="margin:12pt 0cm 6pt;font-family:"Aptos Serif",Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,56,100)">
<b>Scott Nielson</b></div>
<div id="m_3139881791155940968Signature">
<p style="margin:0in;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Serif",Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,serif;color:black">801-660-4400</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<span>-- </span><br><span>Patentpractice mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a></span><br><span><a href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com</a></span><br></div></div>-- <br>
Patentpractice mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com" target="_blank">Patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
<a href="http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/patentpractice_oppedahl-lists.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div>