<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Helvetica;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Aptos;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Helvetica Light";}
@font-face
        {font-family:Georgia;
        panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Justin,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have had success with petitions to withdraw finality, particularly when my arguments fall within the requirements of the MPEP, i.e., the new rejection was clearly not necessitated by the amendments.&nbsp;
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In cases like this, you certainly should decide how to respond and perhaps have an interview with the examiner.&nbsp; But any amendments to overcome the prior art will almost certainly result in the necessity of filing an RCE.&nbsp; I don\u2019t understand
 the appeal or abandon mentality.&nbsp; If claims have not been amended or evidence considered, RCE is the route you must take to put the case in better form for appeal.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:black">Roger L. Browdy<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:black">Partner&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:7.5pt"><span style="font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E">_____________________________________________&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E">FisherBroyles, LLP<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E">direct: +1 202-277-5198<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E"><a href="mailto:roger.browdy@fisherbroyles.com"><span style="color:#467886">roger.browdy@fisherbroyles.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif"><a href="http://www.fisherbroyles.com/"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E">www.fisherbroyles.com</span></a></span><u><span style="font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E"><o:p></o:p></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E">&nbsp;&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Helvetica&quot;,sans-serif;color:#17479E">The information contained in this e-mail message is only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication
 in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Helvetica Light&quot;;color:#17479E"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif"> Patentpractice &lt;patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com&gt;
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Justin Miller via Patentpractice<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 12, 2025 2:22 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. &lt;patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com&gt;<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Justin Miller &lt;justin@distinctpatentlaw.com&gt;<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [External Sender][Patentpractice] Office action made final despite new grounds of rejection<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">I am working on a utility patent application for a medical device. Received a first office action with prior art rejections. I made minor claim amendments, had an interview with the examiner, who
 stated that the application appeared allowable.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">But I just received a final office action based on new prior art references.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">In the final office action, the examiner states that the action is properly&nbsp;final because the new grounds of rejection were necessitated by the amendments. That seems to be a stretch to me.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Has anyone had any luck contesting finality? I have read
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mpep.uspto.gov_RDMS_MPEP_current-23_current_d0e69118.html&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&amp;r=7yDyUE5lzuruhwIvS68v9eFQKnrJuSrXb1MxDfvR_V8&amp;m=jKQ2QYx46wVv-Df3pfjF7FfFEKhyNC37_wS0Gf0yVuqV-1gNZoD9jFZqliWr4FHX&amp;s=00GtQ3kEip7Dup5mBRdOJOwd-6_gkj4ea-wlo8So9Fw&amp;e=">
MPEP 706.07(a)</a>, but it seems unclear as to when the new ground of rejection is &quot;necessitated by applicant\u2019s amendment of the claims&quot;.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">My suspicion is that while it is possible to fight the finality of the office action, it is probably cheaper to file an RCE.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">As the bonus question, I welcome any strategies when receiving a final office action. In my experience, when I receive&nbsp;two rejections from the same examiner, given that I always participate in an
 interview, it is often either time to abandon or appeal. But given that this rejection is substantively different I think a round of negotiation might be helpful. Perhaps I can squeeze in another interview before I respond.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Interesting stats (page is slow to load):<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.bipc.com_us-2Dpatent-2Dpractice-2Dresponding-2Dto-2Dfinal-2Drejections-2Dso-2Das-2Dto-2Dminimize-2Dthe-2Dneed-2Dfor-2Drce-2Dfilings&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&amp;r=7yDyUE5lzuruhwIvS68v9eFQKnrJuSrXb1MxDfvR_V8&amp;m=jKQ2QYx46wVv-Df3pfjF7FfFEKhyNC37_wS0Gf0yVuqV-1gNZoD9jFZqliWr4FHX&amp;s=mJZmkhzxhY4QCMoRKxQTMVBMojbAX51ZaVoSLrxm7xA&amp;e=">https://www.bipc.com/us-patent-practice-responding-to-final-rejections-so-as-to-minimize-the-need-for-rce-filings</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Thanks for reading.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif;color:#222222">Sincerely,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif;color:#222222">Justin P. Miller</span><span style="color:#222222"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif;color:#222222">Patent Attorney</span><span style="color:#222222"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif;color:#222222">Distinct Patent Law</span><span style="color:#222222"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif;color:#222222"><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__distinctpatentlaw.com_&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&amp;r=7yDyUE5lzuruhwIvS68v9eFQKnrJuSrXb1MxDfvR_V8&amp;m=jKQ2QYx46wVv-Df3pfjF7FfFEKhyNC37_wS0Gf0yVuqV-1gNZoD9jFZqliWr4FHX&amp;s=XhHQin4yLav2kv5bTqBRSYKyYoiM_eu6zSbpMwyULfs&amp;e=" target="_blank"><span style="color:#1155CC">https://distinctpatentlaw.com/</span></a></span><span style="color:#222222"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif;color:#222222">Office: 727.513.4590</span><span style="color:#222222"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>