<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>We are a community, and I benefit again and again from inputs to
members of the community. Thank you everyone.</p>
<p>Carl</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/27/2025 6:00 PM, Randall Svihla
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BYAPR06MB558957D2E680F33560802121B0FCA@BYAPR06MB5589.namprd06.prod.outlook.com">
<meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15">
<meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 15">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>This is a good result.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From:</span></b><span>
Patentpractice
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"><patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a>
<b><span>On Behalf Of </span></b>Carl Oppedahl via
Patentpractice<br>
<b><span>Sent:</span></b> Monday, October 27, 2025 5:09
PM<br>
<b><span>To:</span></b> For patent practitioners. This
is not for laypersons to seek legal advice.
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"><patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b><span>Cc:</span></b> Carl Oppedahl
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:carl@oppedahl.com"><carl@oppedahl.com></a><br>
<b><span>Subject:</span></b> Re: [Patentpractice] AI
patent valuation tools</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p><span>I apparently misunderstood an earlier communication
from a fellow listserv member. I have reinstated Mr. Keim
on the listserv.</span></p>
<p><span>Carl</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>On 10/27/2025 4:22 PM, Scott
Nielson via Patentpractice wrote:</span></p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I don't think Ben Keim was
sending advertisements or solicitations. </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The first email in this chain
(not from Ben) asked for "recommendations for AI patent
portfolio evaluation tools."</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Ben replied by listing a tool
provided by Tangible IP. I cannot find any connection
between Ben and the company he recommended. </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Ben is a patent attorney with
Newport IP (<a
href="https://newportip.com/professionals"
moz-do-not-send="true">Our Professionals - Newport IP
Law Firm</a>) and has posted many times on the
listserve. For example, on 20 Oct 2025 he posted the
following:</span></p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I just heard from a SPE that:</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> Acting Commissioner Valencia
Martin Wallace sent out instructions today to the
examiners that they are required to conduct interviews
when they are requested by the applicant in order to
further prosecution. Hopefully, you and all other
practitioners don't experience a detrimental impact.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>-Ben</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I think you have misjudged Ben
and should reinstate him as a member of the listserve.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>And, for the record, I do not
know Ben other than his posts on the listserve. I just
feel like he is being unfairly maligned.</span></p>
</div>
<div id="Signature">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<p class="elementtoproof"><b><span>Scott Nielson</span></b></p>
<p class="elementtoproof"><span>801-660-4400</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal"><span>
<hr width="100%">
</span></div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From:</span></b><span> Patentpractice
<a
href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true"><patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a>
on behalf of Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice
<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true"><patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b><span>Sent:</span></b> Monday, October 27, 2025 2:05
PM<br>
<b><span>To:</span></b> For patent practitioners. This
is not for laypersons to seek legal advice.
<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true"><patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b><span>Cc:</span></b> Carl Oppedahl <a
href="mailto:carl@oppedahl.com" moz-do-not-send="true">
<carl@oppedahl.com></a><br>
<b><span>Subject:</span></b> Re: [Patentpractice] AI
patent valuation tools
</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<p><span>Thank you Suzannah for drawing this to my attention.</span></p>
<p><span>Mr. Keim has been unsubscribed from the Patent
Practice listserv, and has been banned from resubscribing.</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>On 10/27/2025 3:19 PM, Suzannah
K. Sundby via Patentpractice wrote:</span></p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<p><span>Imo, the only person who should be able to send
advertisements and solicitations on this listserv is
Carl\u2026</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>I will make it a point to avoid engaging the
services of anyone else who does\u2026</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssundby/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Suzannah K. Sundby</a>
<b><span>|</span></b> Partner</span></p>
<p><u><span><a href="http://www.canadylortz.com/"
moz-do-not-send="true">canady + lortz LLP</a></span></u></p>
<p><span>1050 30th Street, NW</span></p>
<p><span>Washington, DC 20007</span></p>
<p><span>T: 202.486.8020</span></p>
<p><span>F: 202.540.8020</span></p>
<p><span><a href="mailto:suzannah@canadylortz.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">suzannah@canadylortz.com</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.canadylortz.com/"
moz-do-not-send="true">www.canadylortz.com</a></span></p>
<p><span>Confidentiality Notice: This message is being sent
by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively
for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
This communication may contain information that is
proprietary, privileged or confidential, or otherwise
legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you may not read, print, retain, copy,
or disseminate this message or any part. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the
message.</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><b><span>From:</span></b> Patentpractice
<a href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true"><patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a>
<b><span>On Behalf Of </span></b>Benjamin Keim via
Patentpractice<br>
<b><span>Sent:</span></b> Monday, October 27, 2025 3:14 PM<br>
<b><span>To:</span></b> For patent practitioners. This is
not for laypersons to seek legal advice.
<a href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true"><patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b><span>Cc:</span></b> Benjamin Keim <a
href="mailto:ben@newportip.com" moz-do-not-send="true">
<ben@newportip.com></a>; Umair A. Qadeer <a
href="mailto:umair@qadeerip.com" moz-do-not-send="true"><umair@qadeerip.com></a><br>
<b><span>Subject:</span></b> Re: [Patentpractice] AI
patent valuation tools</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>The people at Tangible IP have the following to say
about one AI tool.</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><b><span>AI Tools: The One We Prefer</span></b></p>
<p><span>Like most of you, we\u2019ve been inundated with demos
from various patent analytics and evidence of use search
platforms that claim to replace seasoned analysts. While
none truly eliminate the need for human expertise, we
found that Limestone|Report stands out as the most
practical solution we\u2019ve encountered, at a price most
can afford.</span></p>
<p><span>What sets Limestone|Report apart is its ability to
provide a comprehensive view of portfolio pedigree while
effectively identifying potential infringers. The
platform delivers near real-time, actionable insights
across Enforceability, Infringement, and Economics for
portfolios of any size \u2013 capabilities that have proven
invaluable in our day-to-day practice.</span></p>
<p><span>We\u2019ve been so impressed with the results that we\u2019re
now incorporating Limestone|Report into all our
represented portfolios.</span></p>
<p><span>What about you? Well, our good friends at Techson
IP have agreed to extend special pricing to our readers
so that you can try it for yourself. You will receive a
20% discount off their standard pricing on your first
project through 12/31/2025 * if you use this <a
href="https://www.techsonip.com/tangibleip"
moz-do-not-send="true">
link</a>.</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>-Ben</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><b><span>From:</span></b> Patentpractice <<a
href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com</a>>
<b><span>On Behalf Of </span></b>Umair A. Qadeer via
Patentpractice<br>
<b><span>Sent:</span></b> Monday, October 27, 2025 7:48 AM<br>
<b><span>To:</span></b> For patent practitioners. This is
not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <<a
href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
<b><span>Cc:</span></b> Umair A. Qadeer <<a
href="mailto:umair@qadeerip.com" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">umair@qadeerip.com</a>><br>
<b><span>Subject:</span></b> Re: [Patentpractice] AI
patent valuation tools</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Greetings all,</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>I was asked by a client with a reasonably sized
patent portfolio about AI tools for patent portfolio
valuation. I have never used such tools, but I was able
to identify several via a Google search. Does anyone
have experience with any of the following:</span></p>
<p><span>\u2022 PricePatent</span></p>
<p><span>\u2022 Patentelligence</span></p>
<p><span>\u2022 Toolip Valuation</span></p>
<p><span>\u2022 XLSCOUT</span></p>
<p><span>\u2022 Patlytics</span></p>
<p><span>\u2022 Orbit Intelligence</span></p>
<p><span><br>
or have other recommendations for AI patent portfolio
evaluation tools?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance for your input!</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Best,</span></p>
<p><span>Umair</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>-----</span></p>
<p><span>Umair A. Qadeer</span></p>
<p><span>Registered Patent Attorney</span></p>
<p><span>Qadeer LLC</span></p>
<p><span>312.248.3020</span></p>
<p><span><a href="mailto:umair@qadeerip.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">umair@qadeerip.com</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.qadeerip.com/"
moz-do-not-send="true">www.qadeerip.com</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><br>
<br>
</span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>