<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I apparently misunderstood an earlier communication from a fellow
listserv member. I have reinstated Mr. Keim on the listserv.</p>
<p>Carl</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/27/2025 4:22 PM, Scott Nielson
via Patentpractice wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BYAPR07MB4517EACD8D21C109D9FBB0FCB0FCA@BYAPR07MB4517.namprd07.prod.outlook.com">
<div class="elementToProof">
I don't think Ben Keim was sending advertisements or
solicitations. </div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
The first email in this chain (not from Ben) asked for
"recommendations for AI patent portfolio evaluation tools."</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
Ben replied by listing a tool provided by Tangible IP. I cannot
find any connection between Ben and the company he recommended. </div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
Ben is a patent attorney with Newport IP (<a
class="OWAAutoLink elementToProof"
id="OWA49fb5168-1507-c45c-ca0b-427d03840d3f"
href="https://newportip.com/professionals"
moz-do-not-send="true">Our Professionals - Newport IP Law Firm</a>) and
has posted many times on the listserve. For example, on 20 Oct
2025 he posted the following:</div>
<blockquote>
<div class="elementToProof">
I just heard from a SPE that:</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
Acting Commissioner Valencia Martin Wallace sent out
instructions today to the examiners that they are required to
conduct interviews when they are requested by the applicant in
order to further prosecution. Hopefully, you and all other
practitioners don't experience a detrimental impact.</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div>
-Ben</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="elementToProof">
I think you have misjudged Ben and should reinstate him as a
member of the listserve.</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div class="elementToProof">
And, for the record, I do not know Ben other than his posts on
the listserve. I just feel like he is being unfairly maligned.</div>
<div class="elementToProof" id="Signature">
<div class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<p class="elementToProof">
<span><b>Scott Nielson</b></span></p>
<p class="elementToProof">
<span>801-660-4400</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<hr>
<div>
<b>From:</b> Patentpractice
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"><patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a> on behalf of
Carl Oppedahl via Patentpractice
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"><patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, October 27, 2025 2:05 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> For patent practitioners. This is not for laypersons
to seek legal advice. <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"><patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Carl Oppedahl <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:carl@oppedahl.com"><carl@oppedahl.com></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<p>Thank you Suzannah for drawing this to my attention.</p>
<p>Mr. Keim has been unsubscribed from the Patent Practice
listserv, and has been banned from resubscribing.</p>
<div>On 10/27/2025 3:19 PM, Suzannah K. Sundby via Patentpractice
wrote:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>Imo, the only person who should be able to send
advertisements and solicitations on this listserv is Carl\u2026</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will make it a point to avoid engaging the services of
anyone else who does\u2026</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a data-auth="NotApplicable" class="OWAAutoLink"
id="OWA6b7be92a-1308-866d-445b-c2eeef98ed87"
href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssundby/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Suzannah K. Sundby</a> <b>|</b> Partner</p>
<p><u><a data-auth="NotApplicable" class="OWAAutoLink"
id="OWA2b9220bf-5ed2-38c9-2e1b-a5b40fa48555"
href="http://www.canadylortz.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">canady
+ lortz LLP</a></u></p>
<p>1050 30th Street, NW</p>
<p>Washington, DC 20007</p>
<p>T: 202.486.8020</p>
<p>F: 202.540.8020</p>
<p><a class="OWAAutoLink moz-txt-link-freetext"
id="OWA5680ee0f-4b24-3ff6-6e9e-6d8acfdf2b8a"
href="mailto:suzannah@canadylortz.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">suzannah@canadylortz.com</a></p>
<p><a data-auth="NotApplicable" class="OWAAutoLink"
id="OWA79f7d506-aa1b-9305-b8ae-f24cfbce6b6a"
href="http://www.canadylortz.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">www.canadylortz.com</a></p>
<p>Confidentiality Notice: This message is being sent by or on
behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary,
privileged or confidential, or otherwise legally exempt from
disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you may not
read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message or any
part. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies
of the message.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>From:</b> Patentpractice <a
class="x_moz-txt-link-rfc2396E OWAAutoLink"
id="OWAb147b55d-3832-1011-6870-929d08236f00"
href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">
<patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com></a> <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Benjamin Keim via Patentpractice<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, October 27, 2025 3:14 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> For patent practitioners. This is not for
laypersons to seek legal advice.
<a class="x_moz-txt-link-rfc2396E OWAAutoLink"
id="OWAb38d0efa-fcdd-8938-3381-14df4a6ecf78"
href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">
<patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Benjamin Keim <a
class="x_moz-txt-link-rfc2396E OWAAutoLink"
id="OWAb8a55bfc-985f-4519-bd77-902b1efff5fc"
href="mailto:ben@newportip.com" moz-do-not-send="true">
<ben@newportip.com></a>; Umair A. Qadeer <a
class="x_moz-txt-link-rfc2396E OWAAutoLink"
id="OWA477e96c2-7b90-00df-e21c-2bada69f9267"
href="mailto:umair@qadeerip.com" moz-do-not-send="true">
<umair@qadeerip.com></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The people at Tangible IP have the following to say about one
AI tool.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>AI Tools: The One We Prefer</b></p>
<p>Like most of you, we\u2019ve been inundated with demos from
various patent analytics and evidence of use search platforms
that claim to replace seasoned analysts. While none truly
eliminate the need for human expertise, we found that
Limestone|Report stands out as the most practical solution
we\u2019ve encountered, at a price most can afford.</p>
<p>What sets Limestone|Report apart is its ability to provide a
comprehensive view of portfolio pedigree while effectively
identifying potential infringers. The platform delivers near
real-time, actionable insights across Enforceability,
Infringement, and Economics for portfolios of any size \u2013
capabilities that have proven invaluable in our day-to-day
practice.</p>
<p>We\u2019ve been so impressed with the results that we\u2019re now
incorporating Limestone|Report into all our represented
portfolios.</p>
<p>What about you? Well, our good friends at Techson IP have
agreed to extend special pricing to our readers so that you
can try it for yourself. You will receive a 20% discount off
their standard pricing on your first project through
12/31/2025 * if you use this <a data-auth="NotApplicable"
class="OWAAutoLink"
id="OWA45f7d6df-b4d5-7c24-8c5d-ff605573269e"
href="https://www.techsonip.com/tangibleip"
moz-do-not-send="true">
link</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>-Ben</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>From:</b> Patentpractice <<a
class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext OWAAutoLink moz-txt-link-freetext"
id="OWAd6586dea-dcb4-07dd-d22b-43867e568855"
href="mailto:patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">patentpractice-bounces@oppedahl-lists.com</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Umair A. Qadeer via Patentpractice<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, October 27, 2025 7:48 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> For patent practitioners. This is not for
laypersons to seek legal advice. <<a
class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext OWAAutoLink moz-txt-link-freetext"
id="OWAc3777ca8-359c-8d6c-e75b-d3f772803a2d"
href="mailto:patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">patentpractice@oppedahl-lists.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Umair A. Qadeer <<a
class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext OWAAutoLink moz-txt-link-freetext"
id="OWA58138bd3-b2d6-053f-f51d-a50f77043a38"
href="mailto:umair@qadeerip.com" moz-do-not-send="true">umair@qadeerip.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Patentpractice] AI patent valuation tools</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Greetings all,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I was asked by a client with a reasonably sized patent
portfolio about AI tools for patent portfolio valuation. I
have never used such tools, but I was able to identify several
via a Google search. Does anyone have experience with any of
the following:</p>
<p>\u2022 PricePatent</p>
<p>\u2022 Patentelligence</p>
<p>\u2022 Toolip Valuation</p>
<p>\u2022 XLSCOUT</p>
<p>\u2022 Patlytics</p>
<p>\u2022 Orbit Intelligence</p>
<p><br>
or have other recommendations for AI patent portfolio
evaluation tools?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance for your input!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Umair</p>
<p> </p>
<p>-----</p>
<p>Umair A. Qadeer</p>
<p>Registered Patent Attorney</p>
<p>Qadeer LLC</p>
<p>312.248.3020</p>
<p><a
class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext OWAAutoLink moz-txt-link-freetext"
id="OWAb56162c5-9fc1-24e2-d571-b8c0da440130"
href="mailto:umair@qadeerip.com" moz-do-not-send="true">umair@qadeerip.com</a></p>
<p><a data-auth="NotApplicable" class="OWAAutoLink"
id="OWA63cb2ca3-c9f7-c949-d580-6111bf780a2a"
href="http://www.qadeerip.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">www.qadeerip.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>