<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Did you use ePCT to generate the Request and the zip file? Was
your applicant client located outside of the US?<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/27/2023 3:26 PM, Russell Nugent
via Pct wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:SA1PR17MB6428326CECFB6F7A49855153B9BDA@SA1PR17MB6428.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;">P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}</style>
<div
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
class="elementToProof">
Dear Group,</div>
<div
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
class="elementToProof">
I filed a PCT application in the USPTO (client's decision not
mine) and I have gotten some confusing correspondence back. The
USPTO made ex officio changes that I can object to. The first
change was that all of the inventors that were listed as
Inventors only have been changed to inventors and applicants.
Can anyone think of a reason they would decide on their own end
that the inventors are applicants too?</div>
<div
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
class="elementToProof">
They then rejected my POA as not being signed by all of the
applicants. <br>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>