<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Calibri Light";
panose-1:2 15 3 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">We filed a 371 (U.S. national stage) application in early April. The international filing date was, let’s say, 09/01/<b>23</b>. The international application # and filing date were correctly entered in Patent
Center to initiate the filing. The correct information was also entered in the ADS.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">However, both the Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt and the Electronic Payment Receipt listed the International Filing Date as 09/01/<b>24.
</b>We checked the continuity tab in Patent Center after noticing the error in the receipts, and it also lists 09/01/<b>24</b>. (Clicking through the PCT link takes you to WIPO, where the International Publication naturally indicates the correct filing date
of 09/01/<b>23</b>.) <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Of course, we always carefully proofread the eventual Filing Receipt (which we don’t expect to receive any time soon) for errors, but
<b>371 filings shouldn’t be able to have this type of error</b>. This is an annoying waste of our time.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">We contacted the consistently competent PCT Helpdesk. The representative had not seen this particular error, but he agreed that it would likely carry through to the eventual Filing Receipt if not corrected,
which he is endeavoring to do. (Then we won’t have to deal with a defective Filing Receipt as well as a corrected one, which means less paperwork down the line.)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Has anyone else experienced this?</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> I suggest proofreading 371 filing receipts very carefully, and if you are awaiting some, I also suggest checking the corresponding
continuity dates in Patent Center.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-ligatures:none">Sharon Rubin<br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:none"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>