[E-trademarks] Let me be the first...

Fri Dec 1 14:43:20 EST 2023

Agreed! All that information, including first use dates, was so helpful!

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:51 PM Julia Anne Matheson <
jmatheson at potomaclaw.com> wrote:

> All –
>
>
>
> My biggest WHINE to the PTO is that the single page that we used to get in
> TESS that shows basis, app no, reg. no, full goods/services, status, etc.
> is not gone – forcing you to go into TARR (which is a much less agile
> system) and into each category.  It is making what used to be a very simple
> search process *so much more time intensive* and frustrating.
>
>
>
> Please, PTO lurkers, can you bring BACK the overview search page?  To not
> be able to see this information at a glance is incredibly frustrating.
>
>
>
> Julia
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *carla calcagno via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2023 6:39 PM
> *To:* Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
> *Cc:* carla calcagno <cccalcagno at gmail.com>; For trademark practitioners.
> This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>
>
> *WARNING:* External email, do not click on links or open attachments
> unless you recognize the sender’s full email address and expect the
> attachments.
>
> Thanks Richard
>
>
>
>  But at the bottom of the results page, I get weird marks like "Brappers"
> and "Heimlich Helper", because they are picking up corporate names as well.
>
>
>
> This doesn't matter too much here, as there so few results, but I can
> imagine a case where the mark is weak and the Search All will get you MANY
> results.  If anyone at the USPTO is monitoring this,  it would be great if
> they could post on their help page an answer to this. Or, does the PTO have
> a place where one can send  questions that can then be added to the Help
> page
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:07 PM Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
> wrote:
>
> Here is the glitch.
>
>
>
> If you search “big john” under *Wordmark* search you get 8,929 hits.
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: A screenshot of a search results Description automatically
> generated]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If you search “big john” under *Search by all* then you get 21 hits.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: A screenshot of a search results Description automatically
> generated]
>
>
>
> *From: *carla calcagno <cccalcagno at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 5:53 PM
> *To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice." <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc: *Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>
>
> Thanks Richard
>
>
>
> You are in basic search right?
>
>
>
> And what is the search term you use so that you ONLY get BIG JOHN marks
> instead of marks containing both those names?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:50 PM Richard Morris via E-trademarks <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> Susan Crane found the glitch.
>
>
>
> You must *not* limit the search to “Wordmark”.   You can only search in
> “Search All”.    Try it.   You get vastly different results.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf
> of "Renee.Kraft via E-trademarks" <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Reply-To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to
> seek legal advice." <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 5:37 PM
> *To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice." <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc: *"Renee.Kraft" <Renee.Kraft at target.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>
>
> I also get 95 results with “big AND john” so at least there’s consistency!
>
>
>
> Maybe try closing out of the current search session and starting a new
> one. You may have accidentally clicked something along the way that’s
> causing the issue. I sound like tech support….have you tried rebooting? J
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Crane, Susan via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2023 4:30 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Crane, Susan <susan.crane at wyndham.com>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>
>
> Odd, when I search “big john” in quotes, I get 95 results for marks
> consisting of Big John
>
>
>
> *Susan L. Crane*
>
> *Group Vice President, Legal*
>
> *Intellectual Property, Brands & Marketing*
>
>
>
> Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
>
> 22 Sylvan Way
>
> Parsippany, NJ 07054
>
> *O* (973) 753-6455
>
> *M* (973) 879-3420
>
> Susan.Crane at wyndham.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Richard Morris via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2023 5:24 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>
>
> I would like to know how to search for a two-word mark. I can search for
> “BIGJOHN” for example. But when I search for “BIG JOHN” as two words I get
> hundreds of trademarks for just the term JOHN and or just the term BIG. I
> only want to retrieve
>
>
>
>
>
> I would like to know how to search for a two-word mark.
>
>
>
> I can search for “BIGJOHN” for example.   But when I search for “BIG JOHN”
> as two words I get hundreds of trademarks for just the term JOHN and or
> just the term BIG.
>
>
>
> I only want to retrieve trademarks that have both words.
>
>
>
> Please help.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf
> of Janet Satterthwaite via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Reply-To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to
> seek legal advice." <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 5:09 PM
> *To: *"Jessica R. Friedman via E-trademarks" <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc: *Janet Satterthwaite <jsatterthwaite at potomaclaw.com>
> *Subject: *[E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>
>
> to post a big WHINE about the new search function.
>
>
>
> I can't figure out how to search by attorney of record or disclaimers, to
> name a couple of whines.
>
>
>
> Then when you click on a hit, it takes you to TSDR instead of TESS
>
>
>
> There are so many more whines.
>
>
>
> PTO—are you lurking? THIS IS VERY BAD.
>
>
>
> *Janet F. Satterthwaite*|Partner/ Chair, Trademark Practice|Potomac Law
> Group, PLLC
>
> 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1025
>
> Washington, D.C. 20006
>
> jsatterthwaite at potomaclaw.com|www.potomaclaw.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttps-3A_www.potomaclaw.com-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21nAKydtstvQnhYlQdKw2Y2f7-2DhZlmh1jHnvsqDVxCCdW2cmPydlqZ-2DnPTd4kNkqM2seLxS9Ksd0nwIhzsz2wLcgT2bzT1Kh0-24&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=RtP_44tItx_zmLFCsMCEw3QqNyJrlBNN9OYP6TKyXdk&e=>
>
>
>
> https://www.potomaclaw.com/professionals-janet-f-satterthwaite
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttps-3A_www.potomaclaw.com_professionals-2Djanet-2Df-2Dsatterthwaite-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21nAKydtstvQnhYlQdKw2Y2f7-2DhZlmh1jHnvsqDVxCCdW2cmPydlqZ-2DnPTd4kNkqM2seLxS9Ksd0nwIhzsz2wLcgT2HlZBZn4-24&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=qINvtuGMREcgDMjfHlxJ8bQ4BNUhoTRJJjkEN3jW-0c&e=>
>
>
>
> *This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is private,
> confidential, and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please notify us immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any
> attachments*
>
> -- E-trademarks mailing list E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttp-3A_oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21nAKydtstvQnhYlQdKw2Y2f7-2DhZlmh1jHnvsqDVxCCdW2cmPydlqZ-2DnPTd4kNkqM2seLxS9Ksd0nwIhzsz2wLcgT2aQZYiLo-24&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=mXFCYmQBQJC5VV9kKLhpZguIzPSFnuDq8vHdiJOXVAA&e=>
>
> This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message. Unless otherwise indicated in
> the body of this email, nothing in this communication is intended to
> operate as an electronic signature and this transmission cannot be used to
> form, document, or authenticate a contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
> and/or its affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email
> communications in the United States, including the content of emails and
> attachments, for security, legal compliance, training, quality assurance
> and other purposes.
>
> -- E-trademarks mailing list E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=oJruHcp2HJa0DUhKCNgtUjLIau538ojZz7IJ6MFjaMI&e=>
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=oJruHcp2HJa0DUhKCNgtUjLIau538ojZz7IJ6MFjaMI&e=>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231201/0581b7f7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 76354 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231201/0581b7f7/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 82441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231201/0581b7f7/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 35081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231201/0581b7f7/attachment-0002.jpg>