[E-trademarks] Let me be the first...

Pamela Chestek pamela at chesteklegal.com
Mon Dec 4 11:58:53 EST 2023


Are you saying the TESS results list? I thought that wasn't admissible 
evidence:

> 1208.02    Cited Registrations and Third-Party Registrations and 
> Applications (TBMP)
>
> Thus, to make a third-party registration of record, or a registration 
> owned by the applicant or registrant not the subject of the appeal, a 
> copy of the registration (from either the electronic records of the 
> Office or the paper USPTO record) must be submitted. [ Note 5.] /*Mere 
> listings of registrations, or copies of private company search 
> reports, are not sufficient to make the registrations of record.*/ [ 
> Note 6.]
>
I thought you've always needed to provide a copy of the registration or 
the TSDR print out, which is the official "title and status" copy of a 
registration. You can get a bulk download of the registration 
certificates from the TSDR Multi-search.

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
300 Fayetteville Street
Unit 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
pamela at chesteklegal.com
(919) 800-8033
www.chesteklegal.com

On 12/4/2023 8:23 AM, Clarkin, Cheryl via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> I need to file a response today with third-party registrations.  If 
> the TESS screen is no longer available, what do I submit?  TSDR screen 
> for each one?
>
> CHERYL A. CLARKIN, SHAREHOLDER​​​​
>
> V-CARD 
> <https://www.apslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/Cheryl-a-Clarkin.vcf> 	 | 
> BIO <https://www.apslaw.com/attorney/cheryl-a-clarkin/> 	 | 	WEBSITE 
> <http://www.apslaw.com/> 	 | 	CCLARKIN at APSLAW.COM 
> <http://www.apslaw.com/>
>
> 175 Federal Street, 10th Floor 	, 	Boston 		MA 		02110
>
> Direct 401.427.6131 	 | 	Main 401.274.7200 <tel:401.274.7200>
>
> PROVIDENCE ‑ BOSTON ‑ NEWPORT ‑ NEW HAMPSHIRE
> <https://www.facebook.com/AdlerPollockSheehanPc?ref=hl>
>
> 	
> <https://twitter.com/AdlerPollock>
>
> 	<https://www.linkedin.com/company/66598?trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1403724428414%2Ctas%3Aadler%20pollock%2Cidx%3A1-1-1>
>
> This e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the named 
> recipient(s). It may contain information that is subject to the 
> attorney client privilege or the attorney work-product doctrine or 
> that is otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you 
> have received this e-mail message in error, or are not the named 
> recipient(s), please immediately notify CClarkin at apslaw.com and delete 
> this message from your computer and destroy all copies. Thank you.
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On 
> Behalf Of *carla calcagno via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2023 3:29 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek 
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* carla calcagno <cccalcagno at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
> For the USPTO, this will also make the TTAB's job more difficult.  One 
> used to be able to introduce pleaded and third party registrations 
> into evidence by attaching the easy-to-read TESS screen to a pleading 
> or notice of reliance.  The TSDR screen is much more complicated and 
> much more difficult to read.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:03 PM Ignacio, Vanessa A. via E-trademarks 
> <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
>     The USPTO should be somewhat ashamed of itself for solely
>     redesigning this system for itself, i.e. to suit its examiners.
>     Sure, they have their jobs to do. But rolling out a new search
>     system that is less agile in some respects, that will take me and
>     my team MORE TIME to compile the same information as before is
>     unconscionable. Examiners do not need to be concerned with billing
>     their time and devising fee structures that provide value to
>     clients while still allow some breathing room to make doing this
>     work worthwhile for those of us in private practice. With all the
>     pressure to be “more efficient” in the IP space, removing the
>     useful TESS summary screen is an unwelcome move, one that is tone
>     deaf to the needs of the USPTO’s paying customers.
>
>     	
>
>     *Vanessa A. Ignacio**​**​**​**​***
>
>     Partner
>
>     Chair, Trademarks, Copyrights & Trade Secrets
>
>     Lowenstein Sandler LLP
>
>     T: (973) 422-6426 <tel:(973)%20422-6426>
>
>     M: (201) 704-6047 <tel:(201)%20704-6047>
>
>     <https://www.lowenstein.com/umbraco/Surface/VcfDownload/Download?email=vignacio>
>
>     	
>
>     <https://www.lowenstein.com/people/attorneys/vanessa-ignacio>
>
>     	
>
>     <https://www.linkedin.com/in/vanessa-ignacio-aaa2366>
>
>     *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
>     Behalf Of *Robert Reynolds via E-trademarks
>     *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2023 2:50 PM
>     *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to
>     seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>; Julia Anne
>     Matheson <jmatheson at potomaclaw.com>
>     *Cc:* Robert Reynolds <rreynolds at kandrip.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>     The good news is that the USPTO is aware of how valuable the TESS
>     summary screens were. I saw this brought up in each of the
>     USPTO-led training sessions I attended, and the speakers
>     acknowledged the same. I’m hopeful that it returns.
>
>     -Bob
>
>     *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On
>     Behalf Of *carla calcagno via E-trademarks
>     *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2023 1:43 PM
>     *To:* Julia Anne Matheson <jmatheson at potomaclaw.com>
>     *Cc:* carla calcagno <cccalcagno at gmail.com>; For trademark
>     practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice.
>     <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>     Agreed! All that information, including first use dates, was so
>     helpful!
>
>     On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:51 PM Julia Anne Matheson
>     <jmatheson at potomaclaw.com> wrote:
>
>         All –
>
>         My biggest WHINE to the PTO is that the single page that we
>         used to get in TESS that shows basis, app no, reg. no, full
>         goods/services, status, etc.  is not gone – forcing you to go
>         into TARR (which is a much less agile system) and into each
>         category. It is making what used to be a very simple search
>         process _so much more time intensive_ and frustrating.
>
>         Please, PTO lurkers, can you bring BACK the overview search
>         page?  To not be able to see this information at a glance is
>         incredibly frustrating.
>
>         Julia
>
>         *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>
>         *On Behalf Of *carla calcagno via E-trademarks
>         *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2023 6:39 PM
>         *To:* Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
>         *Cc:* carla calcagno <cccalcagno at gmail.com>; For trademark
>         practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal
>         advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>         *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>         *WARNING:*External email, do not click on links or open
>         attachments unless you recognize the sender’s full email
>         address and expect the attachments.
>
>         Thanks Richard
>
>          But at the bottom of the results page, I get weird marks like
>         "Brappers" and "Heimlich Helper", because they are picking up
>         corporate names as well.
>
>         This doesn't matter too much here, as there so few results,
>         but I can imagine a case where the mark is weak and the Search
>         All will get you MANY results.  If anyone at the USPTO is
>         monitoring this,  it would be great if they could post on
>         their help page an answer to this. Or, does the PTO have a
>         place where one can send  questions that can then be added to
>         the Help page
>
>         On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:07 PM Richard Morris
>         <richard at 4trademark.com> wrote:
>
>             Here is the glitch.
>
>             If you search “big john” under *Wordmark* search you get
>             8,929 hits.
>
>             A screenshot of a search results Description automatically
>             generated
>
>             If you search “big john” under *Search by all* then you
>             get 21 hits.
>
>             A screenshot of a search results Description automatically
>             generated
>
>             *From: *carla calcagno <cccalcagno at gmail.com>
>             *Date: *Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 5:53 PM
>             *To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not for
>             laypersons to seek legal advice."
>             <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>             *Cc: *Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
>             *Subject: *Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>             Thanks Richard
>
>             You are in basic search right?
>
>             And what is the search term you use so that you ONLY get
>             BIG JOHN marks instead of marks containing both those names?
>
>             On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:50 PM Richard Morris via
>             E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
>                 Susan Crane found the glitch.
>
>                 You must _not_ limit the search to “Wordmark”.   You
>                 can only search in “Search All”. Try it.   You get
>                 vastly different results.
>
>                 *From: *E-trademarks
>                 <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf of
>                 "Renee.Kraft via E-trademarks"
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>                 *Reply-To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not
>                 for laypersons to seek legal advice."
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>                 *Date: *Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 5:37 PM
>                 *To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not for
>                 laypersons to seek legal advice."
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>                 *Cc: *"Renee.Kraft" <Renee.Kraft at target.com>
>                 *Subject: *Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>                 I also get 95 results with “big AND john” so at least
>                 there’s consistency!
>
>                 Maybe try closing out of the current search session
>                 and starting a new one. You may have accidentally
>                 clicked something along the way that’s causing the
>                 issue. I sound like tech support….have you tried
>                 rebooting? J
>
>                 *From:* E-trademarks
>                 <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
>                 Of *Crane, Susan via E-trademarks
>                 *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2023 4:30 PM
>                 *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for
>                 laypersons to seek legal advice.
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>                 *Cc:* Crane, Susan <susan.crane at wyndham.com>
>                 *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the
>                 first...
>
>                 Odd, when I search “big john” in quotes, I get 95
>                 results for marks consisting of Big John
>
>                 *Susan L. Crane*
>
>                 *Group Vice President, Legal*
>
>                 *Intellectual Property, Brands & Marketing*
>
>                 Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
>
>                 22 Sylvan Way
>
>                 Parsippany, NJ 07054
>
>                 *O*(973) 753-6455
>
>                 *M*(973) 879-3420
>
>                 Susan.Crane at wyndham.com <mailto:Susan.Crane at wyndham.com>
>
>                 *From:* E-trademarks
>                 <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
>                 Of *Richard Morris via E-trademarks
>                 *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2023 5:24 PM
>                 *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for
>                 laypersons to seek legal advice.
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
>                 *Cc:* Richard Morris <richard at 4trademark.com>
>                 *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>                 I would like to know how to search for a two-word
>                 mark. I can search for “BIGJOHN” for example. But when
>                 I search for “BIG JOHN” as two words I get hundreds of
>                 trademarks for just the term JOHN and or just the term
>                 BIG. I only want to retrieve
>
>                 I would like to know how to search for a two-word mark.
>
>                 I can search for “BIGJOHN” for example.   But when I
>                 search for “BIG JOHN” as two words I get hundreds of
>                 trademarks for just the term JOHN and or just the term
>                 BIG.
>
>                 I only want to retrieve trademarks that have both words.
>
>                 Please help.
>
>                 Thanks
>
>                 Richard
>
>                 *From: *E-trademarks
>                 <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com
>                 <mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> on
>                 behalf of Janet Satterthwaite via E-trademarks
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>                 <mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
>                 *Reply-To: *"For trademark practitioners. This is not
>                 for laypersons to seek legal advice."
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>                 <mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
>                 *Date: *Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 5:09 PM
>                 *To: *"Jessica R. Friedman via E-trademarks"
>                 <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>                 <mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
>                 *Cc: *Janet Satterthwaite
>                 <jsatterthwaite at potomaclaw.com
>                 <mailto:jsatterthwaite at potomaclaw.com>>
>                 *Subject: *[E-trademarks] Let me be the first...
>
>                 to post a big WHINE about the new search function.
>
>                 I can't figure out how to search by attorney of record
>                 or disclaimers, to name a couple of whines.
>
>                 Then when you click on a hit, it takes you to TSDR
>                 instead of TESS
>
>                 There are so many more whines.
>
>                 PTO—are you lurking? THIS IS VERY BAD.
>
>                 *Janet F. Satterthwaite*|Partner/ Chair, Trademark
>                 Practice|Potomac Law Group, PLLC
>
>                 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1025
>
>                 Washington, D.C. 20006
>
>                 jsatterthwaite at potomaclaw.com
>                 <mailto:jsatterthwaite at potomaclaw.com>|www.potomaclaw.com
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttps-3A_www.potomaclaw.com-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21nAKydtstvQnhYlQdKw2Y2f7-2DhZlmh1jHnvsqDVxCCdW2cmPydlqZ-2DnPTd4kNkqM2seLxS9Ksd0nwIhzsz2wLcgT2bzT1Kh0-24&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=RtP_44tItx_zmLFCsMCEw3QqNyJrlBNN9OYP6TKyXdk&e=>
>
>
>                 https://www.potomaclaw.com/professionals-janet-f-satterthwaite
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttps-3A_www.potomaclaw.com_professionals-2Djanet-2Df-2Dsatterthwaite-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21nAKydtstvQnhYlQdKw2Y2f7-2DhZlmh1jHnvsqDVxCCdW2cmPydlqZ-2DnPTd4kNkqM2seLxS9Ksd0nwIhzsz2wLcgT2HlZBZn4-24&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=qINvtuGMREcgDMjfHlxJ8bQ4BNUhoTRJJjkEN3jW-0c&e=>
>
>
>                 Image removed by sender.
>
>                 /This e-mail and any attachments may contain
>                 information that is private, confidential, and/or
>                 privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
>                 please notify us immediately and destroy all copies of
>                 this message and any attachments/
>
>                 -- E-trademarks mailing list
>                 E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>                 http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttp-3A_oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21nAKydtstvQnhYlQdKw2Y2f7-2DhZlmh1jHnvsqDVxCCdW2cmPydlqZ-2DnPTd4kNkqM2seLxS9Ksd0nwIhzsz2wLcgT2aQZYiLo-24&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=mXFCYmQBQJC5VV9kKLhpZguIzPSFnuDq8vHdiJOXVAA&e=>
>
>
>                 This email message (including all attachments) is for
>                 the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
>                 contain confidential information. If you are not the
>                 intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
>                 email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>                 Unless otherwise indicated in the body of this email,
>                 nothing in this communication is intended to operate
>                 as an electronic signature and this transmission
>                 cannot be used to form, document, or authenticate a
>                 contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and/or its
>                 affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email
>                 communications in the United States, including the
>                 content of emails and attachments, for security, legal
>                 compliance, training, quality assurance and other
>                 purposes.
>
>                 -- E-trademarks mailing list
>                 E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>                 http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=oJruHcp2HJa0DUhKCNgtUjLIau538ojZz7IJ6MFjaMI&e=>
>
>
>                 -- 
>                 E-trademarks mailing list
>                 E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>                 http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=8a5ZW14skhxrLynoC9Lhgvu9vl8vZto91uPOm7zRCJw&m=x-Koe3QhyFcyq5124cU-ZIfH_GT6dZO0sIqlfoWTIIg_HaqwzBIDk8ngYnRy9Ft-&s=oJruHcp2HJa0DUhKCNgtUjLIau538ojZz7IJ6MFjaMI&e=>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>     This message contains confidential information, intended only for
>     the person(s) named above, which may also be privileged. Any use,
>     distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is
>     strictly prohibited. In such case, you should delete this message
>     and kindly notify the sender via reply e-mail. Please advise
>     immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet
>     e-mail for messages of this kind.
>
>     -- 
>     E-trademarks mailing list
>     E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>     http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image513744.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1622 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image741389.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1604 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image127735.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1636 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1208 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1123 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6458 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 76354 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 82441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 35081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD0002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231204/76d3e33e/attachment-0006.jpg>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list