[E-trademarks] selecting live/dead in search
Schonauer, Matthew
mschonauer at ulmer.com
Wed Dec 6 10:52:30 EST 2023
If I were a software developer looking at this I would ask why the LD field wasn’t already a Boolean field. Much easier and more efficient on the software and query side of things. They should have renamed the field to simply “LIVE” – and maybe provided more documentation and training sessions before rollout – but the actual change does make technical sense. fwiw
------
Matthew J Schonauer
Ulmer & Berne LLP
614.229.0024
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Sam Castree via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 2:35 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Sam Castree <sam at castreelaw.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] selecting live/dead in search
It really seems like the stupidest change.Cheers, Sam Castree, IIISam Castree Law, LLC3421 W. Elm St.McHenry, IL 60050(815) 344-6300On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 12:58 PM Martin, Winfield B. (Perkins Coie) via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:This is a small gr
<https://us.report.cybergraph.mimecast.com/alert-details/?dep=A5KjPYUhpvmgP0lkArZ55g%3D%3D45oodu4uFSNscx4MsLd0Ch7yAZHSTo7PrnbKQmpx2sNbGhwSgnHivpf9Epp%2BD3nVGnCc6wyInO8cSyUFTygl6VsaT5hHec9uFuMG84779wr4RrlmG9D7dwPG2TweXvDEpFbkba8zHWFLUboSAhzRwwcKjujOx05Vbr3ofsM5scIAgjiGQfG5a4v805rAXsPXRLXqhMq%2F%2Bi%2F2gH0HPclHJMpCnTPJjGSBqlrTmqVhQGcX%2B15jsozXQRziYaH7rHnu%2F7p283RhsnfmbreCLvUR5N5oRcSBxIuPbuqf9jHVSspa6ccb33yo55qv2%2BwBQWl%2BFjw6BDqd0p1r88S2QASYHKKF5JO%2Fi2ahg4xd0mdzv8z498ln8IzeqAbV4SVpN6TUo2svavCVEieqrArN9TR3%2B8RdxTPs0%2Fqi9D70KA5b%2FXW0D3eVwt76lGBChBP%2F5uCRBkc6qoO915SWpLmekWWaf8d%2FMYt1%2F8O56qnxN2RONL%2Fz4B7MlpT2r3yI2GgXtTBDT5%2BdmbAGeInYPc%2BeXJEwHIaoDMOmjJHg822IL1ukhSzI3duC8vLLtUDdnO360Z3VSvSW7%2FVdgsNETSCSNXYr0MpgX3WxEhnU%2FD8xLxmlvtDeYoVe1GUx7raoCCfc9XBLyhOc73SYxXpf8EUo5CLRYoCeWDuG48vd5cQnFce3Vnui9N3EGMM864yw%2Blx0SGSgWj4rirtMK1iURCfoBNmFopJPBBnNj05oIi5Mm2WHu3I2LfvaUWW1Ho1zeD8OJD5n1SYG51Tsxq5ahlOKJ35lhFVYs8Ty5tVTXTb2%2BPmDw4s%3D>
It really seems like the stupidest change.
Cheers,
Sam Castree, III
Sam Castree Law, LLC
3421 W. Elm St.
McHenry, IL 60050
(815) 344-6300
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 12:58 PM Martin, Winfield B. (Perkins Coie) via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:
This is a small gripe among many more significant ones, but it’s driving me nuts that they changed the terminology for L/D searching that we all used for years and years. Why? Just to ensure that none of our intuitions would stay useful?
Win Martin | Perkins Coie LLP
PARTNER
1201 Third Avenue Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
D. +1.206.359.3788
E. WMartin at perkinscoie.com<mailto:%20WMartin at perkinscoie.com>
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> On Behalf Of Maria Eliseeva via E-trademarks
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2023 7:39 PM
To: 'For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice.' <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: Maria Eliseeva <maria at patentbar.com<mailto:maria at patentbar.com>>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] selecting live/dead in search
Yes, that worked for me today. It used to be LD:live that we sued for many years, I tried using it today and kept getting dead marks. I did eventually get to the manual to see that now for the reasons that escape me the field should be LD:true.
Maria Eliseeva
From: E-trademarks [mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com] On Behalf Of Jacob Fritz via E-trademarks
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2023 9:23 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: Jacob Fritz <jcbfritz2 at gmail.com<mailto:jcbfritz2 at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] selecting live/dead in search
I believe that, since you are now using fields tags, you have to use LD:true instead of the checkboxes.
Thanks,
Jake
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, 8:14 PM mary harris via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:
Using expert (for me, currently a misnomer) mode, I did a search for a field tag (CM) and one class. Once the results came up, I tried at that point to un-check dead marks but it's greyed out. So is that something that you have to do prior to hitting the search command icon? It seems to me that you should be able to look at all the results and THEN narrow them with the toggle switches.
I am so confused!!
Mary
Mary A. Harris, Esq.
960 Toro Street
San Luis Obispo, California USA 93401
mary at maryharrislaw.com<mailto:mary at maryharrislaw.com>
www.maryharrislaw.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.maryharrislaw.com__;!!K_R5ZAeIjLw!Aiwos5TAR1WJmWJqoYgoZD_71o_a39HCzgIWYlzgw1tqcXWhLFP49biQH63_RKW-3CtkQalESMeL_mwR-2cjup7gip_mmQ8$>
(805) 543-0855 (telephone)
CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com__;!!K_R5ZAeIjLw!Aiwos5TAR1WJmWJqoYgoZD_71o_a39HCzgIWYlzgw1tqcXWhLFP49biQH63_RKW-3CtkQalESMeL_mwR-2cjup7gT8LnWmY$>
________________________________
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com<http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231206/92fd5f64/attachment.htm>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list