[E-trademarks] Format for individual trademark records

Orvis orvispc at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 20:51:25 EST 2023


I totally agree. Tsdr is way too Web 2.0 in that everything clicks and expands and this and that. We need a straightforward, compact presentation of the relevant data.

I was hoping the new search with display information in a spreadsheet looking format. There's just not enough data displayed with the results. Tsdr has way too much usually useless data that requires way too much clicking to see

Dec 12, 2023 7:00:51 PM Dale Quisenberry via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>:

> What she said!
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Dale
> 
> C. Dale Quisenberry
> Quisenberry Law PLLC
> 832.680.1000
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 12, 2023, at 5:38 PM, Pamela Chestek via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all (especially PTO lurkers),
>> 
>> I am looking at a newly issued Office Action where the the prints of the cited marks are in a new format, but quite similar to the old TESS format. You can tell because the  formatting of the field content is different. HOW DO WE DO THIS?? How is this view generated, and can we do it too? That would reduce my frustration with the new search system by about 99% if I could get a print of a record that looks like this.
>> 
>> Thanks to anyone willing to fess up!
>> 
>> Pam
>> 
>> Pamela S. Chestek
>> Chestek Legal
>> 300 Fayetteville Street
>> Unit 2492
>> Raleigh, NC 27602
>> pamela at chesteklegal.com
>> (919) 800-8033
>> www.chesteklegal.com
>> 
>> -- 
>> E-trademarks mailing list
>> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> -- 
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com




More information about the E-trademarks mailing list