[E-trademarks] Trade Show booth as specimen

Wed Dec 13 18:33:00 EST 2023

Good Luck Janet!  Susan - FYI - I agree with you as to the source of the
photo - just explaining my experience, similar to Janet's. This also
happens when I have a car company client whose cars at a trade show are
photographed by a third-party digital magazine. If you give the Examiner an
URL link from the magazine to the page where a shot of the car sits at the
trade show, or a third party has a shot of your client advertising its
services  at the trade show,  the examiner likely will issue you a
rejection.

It is a pain!

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 6:24 PM Janet Satterthwaite via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> The context was helpful. So I submitted all of it .
> I will let you know how I get on thx
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 13, 2023, at 5:46 PM, Crane, Susan via E-trademarks <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
> *WARNING:* External email, do not click on links or open attachments
> unless you recognize the sender’s full email address and expect the
> attachments.
>
> Carla,
>
>
>
> This is why I would have just submitted the photo on its own, and not the
> website page it was taken from.  A photo of the services being rendered
> should not depend on the source of the photo for its acceptability.  The
> trade show booth is the trade show booth, no matter who took a picture of
> it.  Yet another example of examiners not understanding the difference in
> specimens for goods vs. services, IMNSHO.
>
>
>
> Getting off my soap box.
>
>
>
> *Susan L. Crane*
>
> *Group Vice President, Legal*
>
> *Intellectual Property, Brands & Marketing*
>
>
>
> Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
>
> 22 Sylvan Way
>
> Parsippany, NJ 07054
>
> *O* (973) 753-6455
>
> *M* (973) 879-3420
>
> Susan.Crane at wyndham.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *carla calcagno via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2023 5:24 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* carla calcagno <cccalcagno at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Trade Show booth as specimen
>
>
>
> Hi Janet In my experience, the Examiners won't take "third party" shots of
> your advertising for services or displays associated with the goods. So I
> would have submitted your client's own picture of the trade show booth.
> Apart
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>
> *This Message Is From an External Sender *
>
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
>
>   *  Report Suspicious  *
> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!ksaLCl3JrGA1Dwbdk9Pnl6aqh9Nsm2lsvA8MRynfTx27a73W7re8z-JmzO_CSU3tXbDQQI-E0tgCXLu55Y7HoGDh73u8shqJCHV3svrtt0gK849WiDABOiFXAEfiwQ$>  ‌
>
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>
> Hi Janet
>
>
>
>  In my experience, the Examiners won't take "third party" shots of your
> advertising for services or displays associated with the goods. So I would
> have submitted your client's own picture of the trade show booth.
>
>
>
> Apart from that the key issue for goods specimens is whether the trade
> show is considered a point-of-sale display.  See,  TMEP 904.03(g). In at
> least one case that I have not read in ages, flyers shown at a trade show
> were considered displays associated with the goods and thus considered
> acceptable as specimens.*In re Ancha Elecs. Inc.*, 1 USPQ2d 1318 (TTAB
> 1986) (holding that a photograph showing an informational flyer or leaflet
> clearly depicting the mark and presented on the goods at a trade show
> exhibit was an acceptable display associated with the goods). But read this
> section, the USPTO will require you to jump through additional hoops when
> you file these types of specimens to show that these trade shows are
> point-of-sale displays for goods and not mere advertising.
>
>
>
> I note that you sometimes say goods and sometimes say services in the
> email.  If the specimens were for services, they should have been accepted,
> without more, in my opinion, so long as the specimens were your own
> client's photos.
>
>
>
> Good Luck!
>
>
>
> Carla Calcagno
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:32 PM Janet Satterthwaite via E-trademarks <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> Hello brain trust
>
>
>
> We filed a use-based application for MARK for sales and marketing of
> [consumer goods].
>
>
>
> The specimen was the mark prominently displayed on client's booth at an
> industry trade show.
>
>
>
> The photo of the booth was from an industry blog.
>
>
>
> The specimen has been refused, first, b/c the photo was in a third party
> blog (so???);
>
>
>
> and second, because it does not show a direct association between the mark
> and the services.
>
>
>
> How can that be? A booth at a trade show can only be for the purpose of
> sales and marketing of the goods. Moreover, the blog post described how the
> goods were displayed at the booth.
>
>
>
> Has anyone encountered this before, before I dive in to the research?
>
>
>
> thx
>
>
>
> Janet
>
>
>
> *Janet F. Satterthwaite*|Partner/ Chair, Trademark Practice|Potomac Law
> Group, PLLC
>
> 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1025
>
> Washington, D.C. 20006
>
> jsatterthwaite at potomaclaw.com|www.potomaclaw.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttps-3A_www.potomaclaw.com-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21l3yRPz2Bc1FokDSK0isePoc7kjGa9t7EPjxwBmXMJuwRceZTm17lDQrIgrPmQKQU8-5FBV7b9V8cghSaKLq1MsA5hNypjrl7w-24&d=DwMGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=BD_ODyCnGyM4QYkJS4ogIYzIigAHSpBLLoEgzCd9OOE&m=B2SM5SdMthITnbhFKS_vs2kCkoWdufUwmnkQfzdwU9N6rZR2na6jXRSiEG8Vc_51&s=nVsxoSpJ1aoUI6zqa0ciRb3GabvhNlYhHX0HORXwE0I&e=>
>
>
>
> https://www.potomaclaw.com/professionals-janet-f-satterthwaite
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttps-3A_www.potomaclaw.com_professionals-2Djanet-2Df-2Dsatterthwaite-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21l3yRPz2Bc1FokDSK0isePoc7kjGa9t7EPjxwBmXMJuwRceZTm17lDQrIgrPmQKQU8-5FBV7b9V8cghSaKLq1MsA5hNhKfc6jg-24&d=DwMGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=BD_ODyCnGyM4QYkJS4ogIYzIigAHSpBLLoEgzCd9OOE&m=B2SM5SdMthITnbhFKS_vs2kCkoWdufUwmnkQfzdwU9N6rZR2na6jXRSiEG8Vc_51&s=1FLAHxNlteaR9Le-uIi33lv-qUgJPwrqBUtaci-Sj1g&e=>
>
>
>
> *This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is private,
> confidential, and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please notify us immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any
> attachments*
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.com_v3_-5F-5Fhttp-3A_oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com-5F-5F-3B-21-21Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o-21l3yRPz2Bc1FokDSK0isePoc7kjGa9t7EPjxwBmXMJuwRceZTm17lDQrIgrPmQKQU8-5FBV7b9V8cghSaKLq1MsA5hNfpkrrBI-24&d=DwMGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=BD_ODyCnGyM4QYkJS4ogIYzIigAHSpBLLoEgzCd9OOE&m=B2SM5SdMthITnbhFKS_vs2kCkoWdufUwmnkQfzdwU9N6rZR2na6jXRSiEG8Vc_51&s=YOYCmLvMxvlmW-amp7wCsmBrsMuFs_vkLqt_H51ptKM&e=>
>
> This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message. Unless otherwise indicated in
> the body of this email, nothing in this communication is intended to
> operate as an electronic signature and this transmission cannot be used to
> form, document, or authenticate a contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
> and/or its affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email
> communications in the United States, including the content of emails and
> attachments, for security, legal compliance, training, quality assurance
> and other purposes.
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__oppedahl-2Dlists.com_mailman_listinfo_e-2Dtrademarks-5Foppedahl-2Dlists.com&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=BD_ODyCnGyM4QYkJS4ogIYzIigAHSpBLLoEgzCd9OOE&m=B2SM5SdMthITnbhFKS_vs2kCkoWdufUwmnkQfzdwU9N6rZR2na6jXRSiEG8Vc_51&s=IXXmzTgu7e8cHFGTXT_M7S9Im6Kb_mD-On14a7ys1TY&e=
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20231213/e86bfb9e/attachment.htm>