[E-trademarks] Standard polite language for Request for Withdrawal as Attorney of Record

[Janice Housey]

Not mine--  but I had reason to be looking at this case and saw the withdrawal another attorney filed that looked well done:  https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=97336471&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch


Janice Housey
Litmus Law PLLC

4 Weems Lane #240
Winchester, Virginia 22601
703.957.5274 office
703.851.6737 cell


ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
This communication is subject to the attorney-client privilege of confidentiality, and is intended only for the identified recipient.  If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and destroy all copies, hard and electronic, in your possession.  Thank you.

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Dana Dickson via E-trademarks
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 2:05 PM
To: for trademark practitioners <E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Dana Dickson <ddlschedules at gmail.com>
Subject: [E-trademarks] Standard polite language for Request for Withdrawal as Attorney of Record

Hi all,

Has anyone submitted a Request for Withdrawal as Attorney of Record with the USPTO due to client's nonpayment?

If so, would you mind sharing what language you entered into the field beneath "I request to withdraw as the Attorney of Record or update the USPTO's database after a power of attorney has ended for the serial/registration number(s) identified above, for the following reason(s):"?

I don't want to expose the client or violate any ethics rules. This document is part of the record that is publicly accessible, including the language entered into that field to explain the reason for withdrawal.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Best,

Dana Dickson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240822/41483825/attachment.htm>