[E-trademarks] seeking billing software suggestions
Dale Quisenberry
dale at quisenberrylaw.com
Sun Dec 1 01:47:26 UTC 2024
My experience is the same as yours, Vic. I think your specimen is good. I’ve used similar specimens before without a problem.
Best regards,
Dale
C. Dale Quisenberry
Quisenberry Law PLLC
832.680.1000
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2024, at 4:17 PM, Vic Indiano via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
Re; Specimens.
I recently received rejection of specimens that I submitted that I struck me as odd, since I have never received a rejection of specimens on this basis before, although I have submitted many similar specimens.
Hypothetically, the trademark is for the term Fast Flush in the standard character format
The specimen that I submitted showed the mark in a logo form and appeared as follows:
<1733004276092blob.jpg>
The reason for the rejection was that it did not show the mark Fast Flush that was sought to be registered. Rather, the examiner believed that the mark that was shown was
Fast Flush Plumbing and HVAC
This struck me as strange, as I have never had a specimen rejected that showed of the mark adjacent to a generic descriptor.
Is the trademark examiner's rejection legitimate? Or is in fact the specimen not a proper showing of the mark?
When I followed up with the examiner by presenting other specimens for her to review, she made another interesting comment.
Some of the new specimens show the term Fast Flush, whereas others showed the term Faster Flush.
I can understand that the use of the term Faster Flush in the specimens does not show use of the term. However, her comment was that the specimens as a group were not good because the mark was used inconsistently in different specimens.
To my knowledge, there is no requirement that a trademark be used in a consistent manner, so long as it is being used in the manner for which an application is sought somewhere.
Again, do you believe the examiner to be correct in her assertion, or a she off base.
Any thoughts and help are most welcome.
Vic Indiano
The Indiano Law Group, LLC
E. Victor Indiano
9795 Crosspoint Blvd. Suite 185
Indianapolis, IN 46256
Direct Phone:317-927-8465
E-Mail Vic at IM-iplaw.com
www.indyiplaw.com<http://www.indyiplaw.com/>
www.im-iplaw.com<http://www.im-iplaw.com/>
<http://www.im-iplaw.com/>
Indiano Law Group, LLC | Indianapolis Intellectual Property Lawyers
Indiano Law Group, LLC, is a boutique litigation firm in Indianapolis providing patent and intellectual property...
[X]
<1733004276092blob.jpg>
--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241201/2b864e04/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1733004276092blob.jpg
Type: image/png
Size: 2024 bytes
Desc: 1733004276092blob.jpg
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241201/2b864e04/attachment.png>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list