[E-trademarks] Due Date for Nov. 30 Office Action?

Mon Dec 2 18:47:51 UTC 2024

(Not legal advice, but) that's also how I'd be inclined to read it.

Sincerely,

Ed Timberlake
*Board Certified Specialist in Trademark Law
<https://www.nclawspecialists.gov/for-the-public/find-a-board-certified-specialist/results/detail/?id=29473>*

*Timberlake Law* <http://timberlakelaw.com/>
Chapel Hill, NC

Schedule a call on Clarity <https://clarity.fm/edtimberlake>
ed at timberlakelaw.com
919.960.1950

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 12:57 PM Louis Levy via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> Thanks for that Ed.  I read this to say that a response to an OA issued
> November 30 is February 28.
>
>
>
> *Louis J. Levy | Attorney*
> *Symbus Law Group PLLC*
> 1775 I Street, NW, Suite 1150 • Washington, DC 20006
> Direct:  240.453.9211• Mobile:  202.258.6547
> *llevy**@symbus.com <eraynes at symbus.com%0dwww.symbus.com>* • *www.symbus.com
> <eraynes at symbus.com%0dwww.symbus.com>*
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Edward Timberlake via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Monday, December 2, 2024 12:49 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Edward Timberlake <ed at timberlakelaw.com>; Dineen Wasylik <
> dineen at wasylik.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-trademarks] Due Date for Nov. 30 Office Action?
>
>
>
> TMEP 310 might be helpful:
>
>
>
>
> https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/current#/result/TMEP-300d1e1222.html?q=Deadline%20february&ccb=on&ncb=off&icb=off&fcb=off&ver=current&syn=and&results=compact&sort=relevance&cnt=10&index=1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Ed Timberlake
>
> *Board Certified Specialist in Trademark Law
> <https://www.nclawspecialists.gov/for-the-public/find-a-board-certified-specialist/results/detail/?id=29473>*
>
>
>
> *Timberlake Law* <http://timberlakelaw.com/>
>
> Chapel Hill, NC
>
>
>
> Schedule a call on Clarity <https://clarity.fm/edtimberlake>
>
> ed at timberlakelaw.com
>
> 919.960.1950
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 12:46 PM Cumbow, Bob via E-trademarks <
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
> I believe the rule is “90 days” not “three months”. Perhaps someone can
> confirm that?
>
>
>
> *Bob*
>
> * Cumbow*
>
> Partner
>
> *Miller Nash LLP*
>
> 605 5th Ave S, Ste 900 | Seattle, WA 98104
>
> *Direct*: 206.777.7468
>
>  |
>
> *Cell*: 425.443.0990
>
>  |
>
> *Office*: 206.624.8300
>
> *Email <Robert.Cumbow at millernash.com>*
>
>  |
>
> *Bio <https://www.millernash.com/professionals/robert-c-cumbow>*
>
>  |
>
> *Insights <https://www.millernash.com/firm-news>*
>
>  |
>
> *Website <https://www.millernash.com/>*
>
>
>
> *Our attorneys regularly offer insights to address the challenges faced by
> our clients. To visit the Miller Nash industry-focused blog overview page
> on our updated website: **please click this link
> <https://www.millernash.com/firm-news>**. *
>
> ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:* This email message may contain confidential or
> privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake,
> please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the email. Instead,
> please notify us immediately by replying to this message or telephoning us.
> Thank you.
>
> ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Dineen Wasylik via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Monday, December 2, 2024 9:31 AM
> *To:* Carl Oppedahl <E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Dineen Wasylik <dineen at wasylik.net>
> *Subject:* [E-trademarks] Due Date for Nov. 30 Office Action?
>
>
>
> *[EXTERNAL MESSAGE: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.]*
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> My brain just isn't working today.  Three months from Nov. 30 is Feb 30,
> which doesn't exist.  Does the deadline therefore roll to March 1?  I am
> reading Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1) and it does not make a
> provision for "if the last day doesn't exist."  It says "if the last day is
> a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the
> end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
>
>
> Or, does it go from last day of the month to last day of the month and
> therefore to Feb 28th?
>
>
>
> (I am calendaring Feb 28th until told otherwise, but now I am just
> curious).
>
>
>
> Best.
>
> Dineen
>
> Dineen Pashoukos Wasylik
>
> DPW Legal
>
> Copyright, Trademark and Appellate Litigation in Tampa, FL
>
> www.ip-appeals.com   *  813-778-5161
>
>
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/ccd4489f/attachment.html>