[E-trademarks] What are you telling your clients ...

Carl Oppedahl carl at oppedahl.com
Mon Dec 2 23:46:02 UTC 2024


I am simply adding up all of the new gouge fees from the Trademark 
Office and telling the client that this is the new price for filing a 
trademark application.

On 12/2/2024 2:24 PM, Kevin Grierson via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> With regard to the surcharge, I’ve been telling clients that the 
> standard application fee is going up $200 per class, unless we can fit 
> the description into the pre-approved list on the TMID. Because 
> “standard fee plus surcharge” is, in essence, replacing the old TEAS 
> standard filing.
>
> With regard to the insufficient information charge, the causes for it 
> are the same as for failing to comply with TEAS-plus requirements, but 
> I’m still trying to figure out what to say there other than to 
> emphasize that we need to have all the required information ready when 
> we file.
>
> *Kevin Grierson**​**​**​**​***
>
> 	
>
> |
>
> 	
>
> Partner
>
>
> 	
>
> Mobile:
>
> 	
>
> 757-726-7799 <tel:757-726-7799>
>
> Fax:
>
> 	
>
> 866-521-5663 <fax:866-521-5663>
>
> Email:
>
> 	
>
> kgrierson at cm.law <mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>
>
> */Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law/*
>
>
> *From:*E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On 
> Behalf Of *Laura Geyer via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Monday, December 2, 2024 4:03 PM
> *To:* For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek 
> legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Laura Geyer <lgeyer at ndgallilaw.com>
> *Subject:* [E-trademarks] What are you telling your clients ...
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
> About the absolutely insane and absurd subcharge that an awful lot of 
> our clients will need to pay to use the freeform g/s field in 
> applications starting next year? And how are you presenting the highly 
> unpredictable “deficiency” amounts in estimates?
>
> (I still can’t believe they’re doing this when it’s basically the only 
> way to avoid a 2(d) refusal in many cases where the broader definition 
> makes no darned sense. Or when the broader category doesn’t include a 
> field option?)
>
> *Laura Talley Geyer*| *Of Counsel*
>
> **
>
> *ND Galli Law LLC*
>
> 1200 G Street, N.W., Ste 800
>
> Washington, DC 20005
>
> Tel: (202) 599-9019 (direct)
>
> https://ndgallilaw.com/laura-geyer/
>
> https://ndgallilaw.com/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/94cc1bdb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5049 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/94cc1bdb/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 285 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/94cc1bdb/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 452 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/94cc1bdb/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 394 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/94cc1bdb/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241202/94cc1bdb/attachment.p7s>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list