[E-trademarks] TM Scam? Responded to a Scam Letter
Annette Heller
tmattorneyheller at aol.com
Tue Dec 3 19:06:23 UTC 2024
Another thought that happened to one of our clients. Received payment to renew a client's registration and found it was filed by another attorney. Client did not know attorney and contacted the attorney. The attorney sent back a photo of a check payable to "Patent and Trademark Office" dated two years ago. It appears that the accountant replied to one of the scam letters sent out two years before. The attorney who filed the renewal used client's web site for specimen but only did a Section 8. Perhaps that is what happened to this client.
Many years ago I had a client that sent payment in response to a scam letter but that registration never got renewed so the client wound up paying twice for a renewal. Annette
Annette P. Heller
Trademark/Copyright Attorney
TM Law & Associates
400 Chesterfield Center Ste 400
Chesterfield [St Louis] MO 63017
www.TrademarkAtty.com
314-469-2610 Fax 314-469-4850In a message dated 12/3/2024 12:57:10 PM Central Standard Time, e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com writes:
Even if the specimen is legitimate, I don’t think it’s a valid filing if the party filing it isn’t the registrant or an authorized attorney, though a legitimate specimen might indicate that the filer at least believed he or she was authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Grierson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
757-726-7799
|
|
|
866-521-5663
|
|
|
kgrierson at cm.law
|
|
|
|
|
Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law
|
|
| |
|
|
From: asarabia2 <asarabia2 at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 1:51 PM
To: Kevin Grierson <kgrierson at cm.law>; For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] TM Scam?
|
EXTERNAL EMAIL
|
Kevin has a good point, might be a fraudulent filing.
Was the specimen filed legit?
On 12/3/2024 10:38 AM, Kevin Grierson wrote:
Hard to see how this is in any way a gift to the client. Unless the client is mistaken and someone with authority at the client authorized the filing, the filing was not made or signed by the client or an authorized representative of the client, but was signed by someone purporting to represent the client. I don’t think that filing can be authorized after the fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Grierson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
757-726-7799
|
|
|
866-521-5663
|
|
|
kgrierson at cm.law
|
|
|
|
|
Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law
|
|
| |
|
|
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of asarabia2 via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 1:20 PM
To: e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
Cc: asarabia2 <asarabia2 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] TM Scam?
|
EXTERNAL EMAIL
|
I am not sure about the State Bar complaint until you know more and until after the holiday season. One mystery is why some random attorney would pay the renewal fee. That is a gift to your client. You might check for other trademarks at the Patent and Trademark Office for which the attorney represents the owner.
100% agree on the power of attorney filing.
Regards,
Tony
IP Business Law, Inc.
320 via Pasqual
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(310)377-5171
www.calrestitution.com
On 12/3/2024 10:02 AM, Eric Morton via E-trademarks wrote:
Is this attorney real? I’d check the attorney’s bar number and look up the attorney with the state bar. A complaint with that attorney’s state bar is in order.
--
Eric D. Morton
Attorney
Clear Sky Law Group, P.C.
1300 Clay St., Ste. 600, Oakland, CA 94612
P: (510) 556-0367 / (760) 722-6582
F: (510) 751-4598
emorton at clearskylaw.com
www.clearskylaw.com
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Tim Ackermann via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2024 9:03 AM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Tim Ackermann <tim at ackermannlaw.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] TM Scam?
Mark,
I'd consider filing a power of attorney ASAP. This is probably not the case -- I don't want to assume attorney malfeasance -- but it's not impossible.
What I'd be worried about is some kind of Amazon / brand-ownership hijacking. Assuming you didn't have a filed power of attorney, the USPTO stopped recognizing you as the attorney upon registration (or completion of earlier maintenance filing) under 37 C.F.R. §2.17(g). Then, once this new attorney files the renewal, the new attorney is recognized under 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1), right? And that attorney will get any kind of emails from Amazon, or Walmart, or whoever now uses that method of verifying brand ownership, under 37 C.F.R. §2.18.
I just don't see another point for paying the client's USPTO fees when you are not going to be reimbursed. And the "we're on vacation and not responding" might just be a dodge.
Sincerely,
Tim Ackermann
The Ackermann Law Firm
E: tim at ackermannlaw.com
P: 817.305.0690
F: 214.453.0810
W: ackermannlaw.com
O: 1701 W. Northwest Hwy. Ste. 100
Grapevine TX 76051
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:41 AM Mark Kaufman via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
Oh great and powerful Brain Trust:
We wrote to a client to renew a registration (due in a year, but inspired by the upcoming increase in PTO fees). Client said they’d send payment. Before we renewed, another U.S. attorney had filed and paid the fee for renewal. Disappointed, I wrote to the client. Client said that they didn’t know who the new attorney was, and that client had mailed me a check to do the work. An email to the new attorney semi-bounces back with the following message:
XYZ Law Firm will be away on vacation for the 2024-2025 holiday season. Afterward [the firm] will begin the winding up process. If you have any questions this email will be monitored sparingly but questions will be addressed in time. [The Firm’s] Intellectual Property web services have been faulty since 9/4/2024. If assistance is needed concerning a prior response please call.
I’m not sure if the “2024-2025 holiday season” means the entire month of December. A phone call to new attorney’s cell phone doesn’t answer, and “mailbox is full.” I’ve sent a text message, but am not optimistic about getting a response.
So: I guess I’ll send the foregoing to TMscam at uspto.gov and, if anyone thinks it’s advisable, to the Post Registration Department. But the curious thing about this hijacking is that the new, unauthorized “law firm”, in the process of taking over the registration, paid the filing fee. Maybe they intend to assign the registration to some other scammer…
I welcome your thoughts and suggestions.
Thanks,
Mark
Mark S. Kaufman
Kaufman & Kahn, LLP
Email: kaufman at kaufmankahn.com
www.kaufmankahn.com
10 Grand Central
155 East 44th Street, 19th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Mobile: +1 (917) 453-7807
Tel.: (212) 293-5556, x 2
This email is intended only for the party to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination or copying of this email is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, kindly notify us immediately, return the email to us, and destroy any electronic or other copies of the email (including any notification to us in your “Sent” folder). Thank you in advance for your cooperation and courtesy.
--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241203/68152937/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4282 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241203/68152937/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 394 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241203/68152937/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 452 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241203/68152937/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 285 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241203/68152937/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5049 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241203/68152937/attachment-0003.png>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list