[E-trademarks] Trademark Search: Missing Wordmarks For New TEAS Special Form Drawings???

[Ken Boone]

I happened to notice that multiple recent TEAS applications that are NOT standard character marks do not have wordmark entries on Trademark Search, yet when I toggled to TSDR, most of the drawings that looked worthy of word marks had wordmark entries on TSDR.  This prompted the search

FD:20241220 AND LD:true NOT FM:*

that retrieves 609 TEAS applications filed last Friday that do not have wordmark entries on Trademark Search.  Per the table below, 23 of the first 25 trademarks (increasing serial number order) have wordmark entries on TSDR but not on Trademark Search. (I only checked the first 25 trademarks for that search.)


#
SN
Search WM
TSDR WM
1
98904955
POWERS'X
2
98911295
FEASTMATE
3
98911517
LOOPYDOO
4
98911546
H HERBALOGY
5
98912752
SANGA EATS
6
98913717
WINGED WOLF I…
7
98913792
MYY
8
98913992
TIJVZK
9
98913995
HOIFAANLONG
10
98913999
CAFE VIDA
11
98914005
HEOICYU
12
98914007
not recorded
13
98914008
HIIT WATER
14
98914009
REMIMPI
15
98914010
SUPREME FIRE S…
16
98914013
CW THE CUSTOM…
17
98914016
MODERN MADE
18
98914019
HEKBATSIU
19
98914024
not recorded
20
98914026
BLOEM
21
98914039
GUNGJOENG
22
98914042
DANNY JIA
23
98914043
GONGNAAMJYULOK
24
98914048
GOKZIJYUZAU
25
98914054
GOEKZAANG

While the wordmark entries on TSDR likely are the literal elements provided by in the raw applications that probably have NOT been reviewed by Pre-Exam, I still expected Trademark Search and TSDR would have matching wordmark entries.  After all, why would you expect the two systems to differ?

Yes, I've shared this wordmark inconsistency between TSDR and Trademark Search with the USPTO.  No, I have not researched how long these inconsistencies have been occurring.

Happy Trademarking,
Ken Boone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241227/cd04131e/attachment.html>