[E-trademarks] Does Font Matter for a Stylized Mark with Non-Standard Character

[Rebecca Brandau]

Yes.

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 5:38 PM Gerry J. Elman via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:

> Might it depend on Applicant’s description of the mark?
>
>
>
> -Gerry
>
> Gerry J. Elman, J.D.
>
> *E**lman **IP*
>
> *Intellectual Property Matters*
>
> 6117 St. James Place, Denton, TX 76210
>
> 610-892-9942   www.elman.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Orvis PC via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Friday, December 20, 2024 4:33 PM
> *To:* e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> *Cc:* Orvis PC <orvispc at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* [E-trademarks] Does Font Matter for a Stylized Mark with
> Non-Standard Character
>
>
>
> I need to file a mark with a word where a non-standard character (
> https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/standard-character-set) replaces a
> letter. So, I need to create a .jpg and file as a stylized mark.
>
>
>
> Will the PTO require evidence of use with the same font used to create the
> .jpg for the stylized mark? No one knows what the font will be when use
> starts.
>
>
>
>
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241225/15ce2707/attachment.html>