[E-trademarks] Sunday filings in the TTAB

Pamela Chestek pamela at chesteklegal.com
Fri Feb 9 19:40:26 EST 2024


Exactly my reaction! That "uh-oh, I know there's /something/!"

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
300 Fayetteville Street
Unit 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
pamela at chesteklegal.com
(919) 800-8033
www.chesteklegal.com

On 2/9/2024 4:36 PM, Jamie Shelden wrote:
> I now recall seeing this post on the TTABlog and I believe it may have 
> been in my subconscious when this question arose.  🤨
>
>
> email signature.jpg
>
>> On Feb 9, 2024, at 4:27 PM, Pamela Chestek via E-trademarks 
>> <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not digging in, but I would make sure this isn't the rule that 
>> applies:
>>
>> http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2018/11/precedential-no-33-ttab-denies.html
>>
>> Pam
>>
>> Pamela S. Chestek
>> Chestek Legal
>> 300 Fayetteville Street
>> Unit 2492
>> Raleigh, NC 27602
>> pamela at chesteklegal.com
>> (919) 800-8033
>> www.chesteklegal.com
>>
>> On 2/9/2024 3:46 PM, Jamie Shelden via E-trademarks wrote:
>>> Thanks everyone.  I feel better now ☺️.
>>>
>>> <image001.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 9, 2024, at 3:40 PM, Dale Quisenberry via E-trademarks 
>>>> <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But keep in mind in a California that means 9:00 pm Pacific.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Dale
>>>>
>>>> C. Dale Quisenberry
>>>> Quisenberry Law PLLC
>>>> 832.680.1000
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 9, 2024, at 5:25 PM, Paradise, Gregg A. via E-trademarks 
>>>>> <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> I agree with Susan. The Board considers the deadline to be 12:00 
>>>>> midnight on the 5^th . The deadline is not the entire day; it is 
>>>>> the end of the specified day (midnight). So “before the deadline” 
>>>>> is even a second or minute before that. You are fine to file 
>>>>> anytime on the 5^th (or 4^th ) if you prefer. And the rule about 
>>>>> weekends and federal holidays only applies to moving deadlines 
>>>>> forward (later). The rule does not change the actual date you file 
>>>>> something. So you are good all around.
>>>>> - Gregg
>>>>> **
>>>>> **
>>>>> *Gregg A. Paradise*
>>>>> gparadise at lernerdavid.com <mailto:gparadise at lernerdavid.com>
>>>>> 908-518-6323 <tel:9085186323>Direct
>>>>> Lerner David LLP
>>>>> 20 Commerce Drive, Cranford, NJ 07016
>>>>> *Bio* 
>>>>> <http://lernerdavid.com/attorneys/index.asp?page=staff_partner_gregg_paradise>*•_LinkedIn 
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/gregg-paradise/0/773/491>_•**vCard* 
>>>>> <http://lernerdavid.com/files/Paradise_Gregg.vcf>*•**lernerdavid.com* 
>>>>> <http://lernerdavid.com/>**
>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY and PRIVILEGE NOTICE
>>>>> The information contained in this email message and any 
>>>>> attachments originated from Lerner David LLP, are covered by the 
>>>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC § 2510 et seq., and 
>>>>> are exclusively for the use of the intended recipient. They may 
>>>>> contain legally privileged, confidential information or work 
>>>>> product subject to attorney‑client privilege or otherwise 
>>>>> protected from disclosure. No waiver of any privilege is intended. 
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for 
>>>>> delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>>>>> notified that the unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or 
>>>>> copying is strictly prohibited and may be in violation of court 
>>>>> order or otherwise unlawful. If you have received this 
>>>>> transmission in error, please immediately notify us at (908) 
>>>>> 654‑5000 (Collect, if necessary).
>>>>> *From:*E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>*On 
>>>>> Behalf Of*Jamie Shelden via E-trademarks
>>>>> *Sent:*Friday, February 9, 2024 6:10 PM
>>>>> *To:*Crane, Susan <susan.crane at wyndham.com>
>>>>> *Cc:*Jamie Shelden 
>>>>> <justtrademarks at gmail.com>;e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>>>>> *Subject:*Re: [E-trademarks] Sunday filings in the TTAB
>>>>> *EXTERNAL EMAIL:*Use caution when opening attachments or links.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose my concern is with the word “before”.  Is/on/ the 
>>>>> deadline still/before/ the deadline?  Is a request for an 
>>>>> extension of a deadline that must be made/before/ the deadline 
>>>>> timely when it is made/on/ the deadline?  I can actually see it 
>>>>> both ways.
>>>>> <image001.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>>> This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole use 
>>>>> of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential 
>>>>> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
>>>>> the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 
>>>>> message. Unless otherwise indicated in the body of this email, 
>>>>> nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an 
>>>>> electronic signature and this transmission cannot be used to form, 
>>>>> document, or authenticate a contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts 
>>>>> and/or its affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email 
>>>>> communications in the United States, including the content of 
>>>>> emails and attachments, for security, legal compliance, training, 
>>>>> quality assurance and other purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On Feb 9, 2024, at 2:46 PM, Crane, Susan
>>>>>     <susan.crane at wyndham.com> wrote:
>>>>>     I haven’t practiced before the Board in a very long time, but
>>>>>     don’t you have until 11:59 on the 5^th ? So Sunday should be
>>>>>     in time.
>>>>>     *Susan L. Crane*
>>>>>     *Group Vice President, Legal*
>>>>>     *Intellectual Property, Brands & Marketing*
>>>>>     Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
>>>>>     22 Sylvan Way
>>>>>     Parsippany, NJ 07054
>>>>>     *O*(973) 753-6455
>>>>>     *M*(973) 879-3420
>>>>>     *From:*E-trademarks
>>>>>     <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>*On Behalf Of*Jamie
>>>>>     Shelden via E-trademarks
>>>>>     *Sent:*Friday, February 9, 2024 5:42 PM
>>>>>     *To:*e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>>>>>     *Cc:*Jamie Shelden <justtrademarks at gmail.com>
>>>>>     *Subject:*[E-trademarks] Sunday filings in the TTAB
>>>>>     Happy Friday everyone! Could someone point me to a case or
>>>>>     rule regarding the filing of a motion in a TTAB proceeding on
>>>>>     a Sunday and whether a Sunday filing is considered “prior to”
>>>>>     the deadline. Here is the hypothetical situation. In an
>>>>>     opposition,
>>>>>     ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>>>>>     *This Message Is From an External Sender*
>>>>>     Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
>>>>>     the sender and know the content is safe.
>>>>>
>>>>>     *  Report Suspicious *
>>>>>     <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!nEaFClFvDgEbzmbZGpPJvJl6O76-GjJZS0wOPCiDCAlbePIC5P9ULyG3R5He4Ubd0g2U4juXt2cbCCQ4MG-ENUWEJUABq-MlDGM$>  ‌
>>>>>
>>>>>     ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>>>>>     Happy Friday everyone!  Could someone point me to a case or
>>>>>     rule regarding the filing of a motion in a TTAB proceeding on
>>>>>     a Sunday and whether a Sunday filing is considered “prior to”
>>>>>     the deadline.
>>>>>     Here is the hypothetical situation.  In an opposition,
>>>>>     Plaintiff’s trial period closes on Monday, February 5.
>>>>>      Plaintiff files request for extension of its trial period on
>>>>>     Sunday, February 4.  Given that February 4 is a Sunday, would
>>>>>     this request for extension be “/before the original time or
>>>>>     its extension expires”/ per FRCP 6(b)?
>>>>>     Any thoughts?
>>>>>     <image001.jpg>
>>>>>     This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole
>>>>>     use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
>>>>>     information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>>>>     contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
>>>>>     the original message. Unless otherwise indicated in the body
>>>>>     of this email, nothing in this communication is intended to
>>>>>     operate as an electronic signature and this transmission
>>>>>     cannot be used to form, document, or authenticate a contract.
>>>>>     Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and/or its affiliates may monitor
>>>>>     all incoming and outgoing email communications in the United
>>>>>     States, including the content of emails and attachments, for
>>>>>     security, legal compliance, training, quality assurance and
>>>>>     other purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> E-trademarks mailing list
>>>>> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>>>>> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>>>> <image001.jpg>--
>>>> E-trademarks mailing list
>>>> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>>>> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> E-trademarks mailing list
>> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240209/166688e2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: email signature.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 61601 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240209/166688e2/attachment.jpg>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list