[E-trademarks] John's Post re the TTAB Jettisoning the USPQ

Pamela Chestek pamela at chesteklegal.com
Mon Feb 12 18:56:26 EST 2024


Nobody has the USPQ and all the cases are in Westlaw, where it is 
trivial to find them by name.

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
300 Fayetteville Street
Unit 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com

On 2/12/2024 3:45 PM, reidl--- via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I don’t know how many of you caught up with John’s TTABlog today about 
> the potential requirement that henceforth all citations to the TTAB 
> will need to be to WESTLAW.  To me, this sounds like a solution in 
> search of a problem.
>
> How many people are they going to hire to change all USPQ cites in the 
> TBMP to Westlaw cites?  And what about we old timers who have 
> extensive libraries of USPQ citations?  I know, the USPQ has only been 
> published since 1929 but it is still the standard.  And what about 
> Federal Courts who prefer the USPQ cites?  From my standpoint, I’d 
> have to write a brief using USPQ cites and then have the client pay an 
> associate to translate that into WESTLAW cites. Why impose that cost 
> on us?
>
> I have an open mind but would really like to know why the Board thinks 
> that changing the citation format it has used for its entire existence 
> is beneficial.  If I were still a solo, and one who did not subscribe 
> to Westlaw, I would have to do so in order to practice before the 
> TTAB.  I know that the universe of we folks who actually did legal 
> research using dusty books in dwindling, but still ……
>
> I could understand saying that “for cases decided from now on you must 
> cite to Westlaw” but to redo history makes no sense for me.
>
>
>       That said, I am equally bewildered by the MENSTRUATION
>       CRUSTACEON decision.
>
> **
>
> Paul
>
> Paul W. Reidl
>
> Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty
>
> 1455 1st St #301
>
> Napa, CA 94559
>
> 707-261-7010 x 7210
>
> preidl at dpf-law.com <mailto:preidl at dpf-law.com>
>
> @TMGuy
>
> **
>
> **
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240212/7dcc5459/attachment.htm>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list