[E-trademarks] Mark not examined in over three years: OR Franz Kafka's Secret Trademark Office

Tue Jul 16 13:14:46 EDT 2024

Unfortunately I don’t see the owner of the unassigned application on that list (although it is a Chinese company).

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Crane, Susan via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 1:01 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Crane, Susan <susan.crane at wyndham.com>; charles.b.kramer at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Mark not examined in over three years: OR Franz Kafka's Secret Trademark Office

Well, I can tell you why the application has not been examined.  See attached Show Cause Order.

Susan L. Crane
Group Vice President, Legal
Intellectual Property, Brands & Marketing

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
22 Sylvan Way
Parsippany, NJ 07054
O (973) 753-6455
M (973) 879-3420
Susan.Crane at wyndham.com<mailto:Susan.Crane at wyndham.com>

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> On Behalf Of Charles B. Kramer via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 12:23 PM
To: e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Charles B. Kramer <charlesbkramer.tm at gmail.com<mailto:charlesbkramer.tm at gmail.com>>; charles.b.kramer at gmail.com<mailto:charles.b.kramer at gmail.com>
Subject: [E-trademarks] Mark not examined in over three years: OR Franz Kafka's Secret Trademark Office

Dear Trademark List, One of my client's applications is suspended pending the resolution of a preexisting application. Fair enough. HOWEVER: 1. When it is examined, the preexisting application almost certainly will be refused registration. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
    Report Suspicious  <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!n8aFpLDhDiubb4a32jMNv8xbCNF09tcC9SBE7u1pdJnpvQ_UCOrXVfg4BRdl5XnZZvl-2la5Ae5MqbYIEA_7fdKtXNz06Q$>   ‌
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear Trademark List,

One of my client's applications is suspended pending the resolution of a preexisting application.

Fair enough.  HOWEVER:

1.  When it is examined, the preexisting application almost certainly will be refused registration.  While my client's current application is junior, it also has a senior registration which gives it superior rights.  It was on that basis my client's application was suspended.

2.  I filed a Letter of Protest in the preexisting application, informing the Trademark Office of my client's senior registration.  The Letter was accepted - causing a notation in the record of the preexisting application.

3.  The preexisting application was filed in May 2021 -- yes, over three years ago -- yet no Examiner has been appointed!  The only notation in the public file since then is the reference to my recently filed Letter of Protest (the notation is addressed to the "Examiner:" followed by no name).

I wrote to TrademarkAssistanceCenter at uspto.gov<mailto:TrademarkAssistanceCenter at uspto.gov> about this, and got a long generic non-sequitur response, explaining how "suspensions" work.   As to the preexisting application it only wrote: "we can't discuss any particular application or registration with a third party."

So, what, trademark applications can be ignored indefinitely -- and for unexplained reasons?   I did not make any ex-parte statement about the preexisting application except to observe it has not been examined, which is an objective fact, and a problem for my client.

The Trademark Examiner for my client's application (who understands the preexisting application is likely to be refused registration) suggested I write to TMPolicy at uspto.gov<mailto:TMPolicy at uspto.gov> because it can see the non-public aspects of the preexisting application -- and she cannot.

I do not mean to suggest anything nefarious is going on -- beyond system failure (things get lost).   But (if I may be forgiven for being a little grandiose) the fact there is a world of secret trademark files -- who's secrecy prevents my client from asserting its rights -- seems like a Due Process violation.  Or Administrative Procedure Act violation. Or something.  Halloooo Franz Kafka!

Any suggestions?

Best,

 - Charles

===========================================
Charles B. Kramer, Esq.
~ ATTORNEY ~
Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/charleskramer<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.linkedin.com/in/charleskramer__;!!Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!gmS3qlz5nunsTiZKq74oBH-7NchPTz3yC7oD3eGV_2nXVDjxf9CyhwHBS5jbFtq2xJ_PNofvC-duQfStmqnzl-Uy54hD_To$>
     Tel: +1 917-512-2721
   Email: charles.b.kramer at gmail.com<mailto:charles.b.kramer at gmail.com> <--- for direct responses
    Mail: 200 E. 10th Street, No. 816, New York, NY 10003
    Blog: https://www.provideocoalition.com/CharlesBKramer/
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.provideocoalition.com/CharlesBKramer/__;!!Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!gmS3qlz5nunsTiZKq74oBH-7NchPTz3yC7oD3eGV_2nXVDjxf9CyhwHBS5jbFtq2xJ_PNofvC-duQfStmqnzl-UyLiVtTVc$>
This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Unless otherwise indicated in the body of this email, nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature and this transmission cannot be used to form, document, or authenticate a contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and/or its affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email communications in the United States, including the content of emails and attachments, for security, legal compliance, training, quality assurance and other purposes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240716/97f28d56/attachment.htm>