[E-trademarks] Extension of time to oppose based on Settlement Discussions, even though there are none

[Stephen McArthur]

I assume the answer is "No" here, but I thought I'd ask the braintrust just
in case.

Assume someone files a "First 90 Day Request for Extension of Time to
Oppose for Good Cause" against your client's trademark application. They
choose as the good cause: "The potential opposer is engaged in settlement
discussions with applicant".

However, the potential opposer has never contacted us. There are no
communications at all, much less an engagement of settlement discussions.

Is there any recourse here to somehow get the extension rejected, even
after it has been automatically approved?


*The McArthur Law Firm*Stephen Charles McArthur
8383 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 800
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
(424) 258-6815
www.smcarthurlaw.com

*This email, including any attachments, may contain material that is
confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product, or inside
information, for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient or if you received this message in error, please notify us and
delete all copies. Sender reserves and asserts all rights to
confidentiality, including all privileges and copyrights that may apply.
Thank you. *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20240607/8f83061a/attachment.html>