[E-trademarks] Dolly opposes! (was What do you think happens if Dolly opposes?)

[Carl Oppedahl]

On 10/5/2024 2:13 PM, Carl Oppedahl via E-trademarks wrote:
>
> And has now filed opposition.   The Notice is attached.
>
The Answer by the defendant would have been due on November 14 
(yesterday).  What the defendant did instead is a unilateral abandonment 
of the "Polly Darton" application.  Barring some surprise, what will 
happen next is entry by the Board of judgment against the defendant.

It will be recalled that in the Notice of Opposition, the plaintiff 
(Dolly Parton) cited no fewer than /*eleven prior filings*/ in the 
Trademark Office.  I continue to be baffled that the Examining Attorney 
snoozed through this case ( TSDR 
<https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=98403306&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=documentSearch> 
), and that the nameless person who carried out "final review prior to 
publication" on about June 29 likewise snoozed through this case.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241115/354abd5e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ttabvue-91294369-OPP-4.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 83496 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241115/354abd5e/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241115/354abd5e/attachment.p7s>