[E-trademarks] Wayback Machine

Fri Oct 11 18:34:27 EDT 2024

Wayback machine has been under DDOS attack for the last two days; so they
pulled the site down.

https://x.com/internetarchive/status/1844134181451989331

https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/9/24266419/internet-archive-ddos-attack-pop-up-message

Respectfully,

Narek Zohrabyan, Esq.

*Phil IP Law Inc.*

1055 East Colorado Blvd., Suite 500

Pasadena, CA 91106

t: 1-619-929-0606

e: nzoh at philip.law

w: www.philip.law

Clients are assured that this is a confidential communication and is
protected by the attorney-client privilege. However, no communication
resulting herein shall create an attorney-client relationship unless a
separate retainer agreement, covering these issues, is signed by the
attorney and client. Outside counsel collaborating with our firm are also
protected by this privilege. Nevertheless, our firm would be obliged if you
could notify us if you have received an email by error. We would also
appreciate it if you could delete and not share the email because
mis-delivery is not a waiver of the privilege. Furthermore, no tax advice
is provided.

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:00 AM <e-trademarks-request at oppedahl-lists.com>
wrote:

> Send E-trademarks mailing list submissions to
>         e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         e-trademarks-request at oppedahl-lists.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         e-trademarks-owner at oppedahl-lists.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of E-trademarks digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Wayback Machine (doug at giga.law)
>    2. Re: Pre-Examination Unit wait time (Ken Boone)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:15:12 -0400
> From: <doug at giga.law>
> To: "'For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
>         legal advice.'" <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Wayback Machine
> Message-ID: <026e01db1b2f$95e77b30$c1b67190$@giga.law>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> More Internet Archive news ? a breach that exposed data on 31 million
> users:
> https://giga.law/daily-news/2024/10/10/breach-at-internet-archive-exposes-data-on-31-million-users
>
>
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
>
> From: doug at giga.law <doug at giga.law>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 2:30 PM
> To: 'For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal
> advice.' <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Subject: RE: [E-trademarks] Wayback Machine
>
>
>
> I get the same result. Let?s hope it?s a temporary technical issue and not
> related to the ongoing legal issues.
>
>
>
> Douglas M. Isenberg | The GigaLaw Firm
>
> Attorney at Law
>
> Phone: 1-404-348-0368
>
> Email:  <mailto:Doug at Giga.Law> Doug at Giga.Law
>
> Web:  <http://www.giga.law/> www.Giga.Law
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com <mailto:
> e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> > On Behalf Of Kevin Grierson
> via E-trademarks
> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 2:21 PM
> To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal
> advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com <mailto:
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> >
> Cc: Kevin Grierson <kgrierson at cm.law <mailto:kgrierson at cm.law> >
> Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Wayback Machine
>
>
>
> The front page works for me, but when I try to look for a website, I get a
> page with this:
>
>
>
> The Wayback Machine is an initiative of the Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3)
> non-profit, building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural
> artifacts in digital form.
>
> Other projects include Open Library & archive-it.org.
>
>
>
> Your use of the Wayback Machine is subject to the Internet Archive's Terms
> of Use.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kevin Grierson????
>
>
> |
>
> Partner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    <tel:757-726-7799> 757-726-7799
>
>
>
>
>    <fax:866-521-5663> 866-521-5663
>
>
>
>
>    <mailto:kgrierson at cm.law> kgrierson at cm.law
>
>
>
> Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law
>
>
>
>
>
> From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com <mailto:
> e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> > On Behalf Of Michael Brown via
> E-trademarks
> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 2:16 PM
> To: e-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com <mailto:
> e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> >
> Cc: Michael Brown <michaeljbrownlaw at gmail.com <mailto:
> michaeljbrownlaw at gmail.com> >
> Subject: [E-trademarks] Wayback Machine
>
>
>
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
> Is the Wayback Machine gone? I've tried on Chrome and Firefox and am
> getting blank screens.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> Michael Brown
> Michael J Brown Law Office
>
> 354 Eisenhower Parkway
>
> Plaza I, 2nd Floor, Suite 2025
>
> Livingston, NJ  07039
>
> michaeljbrownlaw at gmail.com <mailto:michaeljbrownlaw at gmail.com>
>
> michael at mjbrownlaw.com <mailto:michael at mjbrownlaw.com>
>
> www.mjbrownlaw.com <http://www.mjbrownlaw.com/>
> +1 973-577-6300  fax +1 973-577-6301
>
> Google Voice +1 973-637-0358
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241010/3870d196/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 5049 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241010/3870d196/attachment-0004.png
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image002.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 285 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241010/3870d196/attachment-0005.png
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image003.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 452 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241010/3870d196/attachment-0006.png
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image004.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 394 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241010/3870d196/attachment-0007.png
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 19:08:05 +0000
> From: Ken Boone <boondogles at hotmail.com>
> To: "E-Trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com"
>         <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Pre-Examination Unit wait time
> Message-ID:
>         <
> BN8PR08MB6420E883620F7BB7152C2FBFD5782 at BN8PR08MB6420.namprd08.prod.outlook.com
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Continuing my analyses of trademarks that apparently were skipped by
> Pre-Exam for valid mark drawing code entries ...
>
> The search LD:true AND FD:[* TO 20240208] AND SN:79* AND MD:( 0 unknown )
> retrieves 112 Madrid filings over 8 months old (by filing date provided by
> IB) that still have the UNKNOWN mark drawing code; however, the first 11
> (in decreasing serial number order) were received at the USPTO last
> Thursday (10/3/24), so they are just a week old today, within the
> advertised 7 day Pre-Exam processing time.  Trademarks 12 through 112 below
> have been at the USPTO at least 3 weeks, but Pre-Exam apparently has yet to
> provide valid Mark Drawing Code entries for those filings.  That is, the
> last 101 Madrid filings listed below have been at the USPTO for over 3
> weeks, but the USPTO claims the processing time for Madrid application
> average just one week.
>
> #
> SN
> FiledDate
> Received
> Comment
> 1
> 79405897
> 2024-01-26
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 2
> 79405723
> 2024-01-24
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 3
> 79405710
> 2024-01-16
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 4
> 79405674
> 2023-12-07
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 5
> 79405668
> 2024-01-31
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 6
> 79405667
> 2023-10-03
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 7
> 79405660
> 2024-02-07
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 8
> 79405622
> 2023-12-22
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 9
> 79405621
> 2023-10-25
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 10
> 79405614
> 2021-01-05
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 11
> 79405450
> 2023-05-26
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 12
> 79404745
> 2023-12-06
> 19-Sep-24
> 3 weeks @ USPTO
> 13
> 79401034
> 2023-12-19
> 25-Jul-24
> 14
> 79399770
> 2024-01-18
> 11-Jul-24
> 15
> 79398769
> 2023-10-23
> 27-Jun-24
> 16
> 79398230
> 2024-02-07
> 17
> 79398226
> 2024-02-07
> 18
> 79398181
> 2023-12-04
> 19
> 79395981
> 2024-02-08
> 20
> 79395957
> 2024-02-06
> 21
> 79395504
> 2024-01-31
> 22
> 79395498
> 2024-02-01
> 23
> 79394993
> 2024-01-03
> 24
> 79394530
> 2024-01-15
> 25
> 79391552
> 2024-01-19
> 26
> 79391549
> 2023-12-07
> 27
> 79391545
> 2024-02-02
> 28
> 79391544
> 2024-02-02
> 29
> 79391543
> 2024-02-06
> 30
> 79391536
> 2023-12-08
> 31
> 79391535
> 2024-02-06
> 32
> 79391532
> 2024-01-26
> 33
> 79391530
> 2024-01-15
> 34
> 79391529
> 2023-12-01
> 35
> 79391527
> 2023-11-06
> 36
> 79391526
> 2024-02-02
> 37
> 79391522
> 2024-02-05
> 38
> 79391521
> 2023-12-14
> 39
> 79391518
> 2024-01-25
> 40
> 79391517
> 2024-02-06
> 41
> 79391513
> 2023-12-22
> 42
> 79391511
> 2024-01-11
> 43
> 79391507
> 2024-01-30
> 44
> 79391431
> 2023-11-10
> 45
> 79391128
> 2024-02-08
> 46
> 79391126
> 2024-01-25
> 47
> 79391125
> 2024-01-26
> 48
> 79391123
> 2024-02-08
> 49
> 79391122
> 2024-02-08
> 50
> 79391119
> 2024-02-02
> 51
> 79391118
> 2024-01-31
> 52
> 79391117
> 2024-01-30
> 53
> 79391114
> 2023-12-13
> 54
> 79391112
> 2024-01-22
> 55
> 79391111
> 2024-02-05
> 56
> 79391110
> 2024-02-06
> 57
> 79391109
> 2024-02-08
> 58
> 79391108
> 2024-01-09
> 59
> 79391107
> 2024-02-07
> 60
> 79391106
> 2024-02-01
> 61
> 79391105
> 2024-02-02
> 62
> 79391104
> 2023-11-11
> 63
> 79390676
> 2024-01-26
> 64
> 79390675
> 2024-02-05
> 65
> 79390674
> 2023-12-20
> 66
> 79390673
> 2023-12-20
> 67
> 79390672
> 2024-01-24
> 68
> 79390671
> 2024-02-07
> 69
> 79390670
> 2024-02-07
> 70
> 79390669
> 2024-02-06
> 71
> 79390668
> 2024-01-23
> 72
> 79390667
> 2024-01-26
> 73
> 79390666
> 2024-02-07
> 74
> 79390665
> 2024-02-07
> 75
> 79390664
> 2024-01-26
> 76
> 79390663
> 2024-02-01
> 77
> 79390662
> 2024-02-01
> 78
> 79390661
> 2024-01-31
> 79
> 79390660
> 2024-01-31
> 80
> 79390659
> 2024-01-24
> 81
> 79390658
> 2024-01-05
> 82
> 79390657
> 2024-02-01
> 83
> 79390656
> 2024-02-01
> 84
> 79390655
> 2024-02-06
> 85
> 79390654
> 2024-02-06
> 86
> 79390653
> 2024-02-02
> 87
> 79390652
> 2024-02-06
> 88
> 79390651
> 2024-02-06
> 89
> 79390650
> 2024-02-05
> 90
> 79390649
> 2024-02-02
> 91
> 79390648
> 2024-01-26
> 92
> 79390647
> 2024-01-30
> 93
> 79390646
> 2024-01-22
> 94
> 79390645
> 2024-02-06
> 95
> 79390643
> 2024-01-26
> 96
> 79390642
> 2024-01-26
> 97
> 79390641
> 2024-02-06
> 98
> 79390639
> 2024-01-22
> 99
> 79390638
> 2024-02-02
> 100
> 79390637
> 2024-02-06
> 101
> 79390636
> 2024-01-30
> 102
> 79390635
> 2024-01-15
> 103
> 79390634
> 2024-01-26
> 104
> 79390633
> 2024-02-02
> 105
> 79390632
> 2024-01-25
> 106
> 79390631
> 2024-01-26
> 107
> 79390630
> 2024-01-17
> 108
> 79390629
> 2024-01-18
> 109
> 79390628
> 2024-02-06
> 110
> 79390627
> 2024-02-06
> 111
> 79390295
> 2024-01-29
> 112
> 79382531
> 2023-07-17
>
> The search LD:true AND FD:[* TO 20240208] AND MD:( 0 unknown ) NOT SN:(79*
> 89*) retrieves 18 live non-Madrid trademarks over 8 months old that still
> have the UNKNOWN mark drawing code - that Pre-Exam apparently has yet to
> complete providing valid Mark Drawing Code entries for those filings,
> though some older registrations in the 81-series are among those search
> results.
>
> #
> SN
> FiledDate
> Comment
> 1
> 98377127
> 2024-01-26
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 2
> 98374581
> 2024-01-25
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 3
> 98346587
> 2024-01-08
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 4
> 98185711
> 2023-09-18
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 5
> 98183363
> 2023-09-17
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 6
> 98183254
> 2023-09-16
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 7
> 97916734
> 2023-05-02
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 8
> 97742991
> 2023-01-05
> Did Pre-Exam skip this application?
> 9
> 76140440
> 2000-10-05
> Registered, But UNKNOWN Mark Drawing Code?
> 10
> 81337716
> 1984-10-15
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 11
> 81161075
> 1979-07-16
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 12
> 81148965
> 1979-05-15
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 13
> 81148938
> 1979-02-01
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 14
> 81142298
> 1978-04-28
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 15
> 81209948
> 1978-01-01
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 16
> 81119026
> 1977-07-05
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 17
> 81068511
> 1976-05-13
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
> 18
> 81029001
> 1973-08-02
> Dead 81-series trademark that is LIVE on Trademark Search
>
>
> As I recall, some work area other that Pre-Exam is responsible for the
> 89-series trademarks, so I will not bother listing the 82 trademarks for the
>
> LD:true AND FD:[* TO 20240208] AND MD:( 0 unknown ) AND SN:89*
>
> search that still do NOT have valid mark drawing code entries. Several of
> those 82 trademarks appear to be skeleton records (no drawing, wordmark,
> owner, etc), like someone created the records for future use.  Yet they
> have filing dates.  Seems weird to me.
>
>
> Happy Trademarking,
> Ken Boone
>
> ________________________________
> From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf of
> Ken Boone via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 9:12 AM
> To: E-Trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Cc: Ken Boone <boondogles at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Pre-Examination Unit wait time
>
> >> Hi.  Does anyone have any insight into what?s going on at the
> Pre-Examination Unit, with a target 10-day wait time and a current (as of
> August) average 131-day wait time?
>
> There's obvious answer, namely it's the natural consequence of such a huge
> backlog on new applications to process.  But I tried to dig a little
> deeper, first addressing the Madrid applications and then addressing
> non-Madrid applications.  For both cases, I first looked at missing GS
> entries.  Sorry, but I did NOT get to occurrences of the UNKNOWN mark
> drawing code, as I got too frustrated performing that missing GS text
> review.
>
> 1A - Madrid applications missing GS entries.
>
> After a few trial searches, the search LD:true AND FD:[* TO 20240710] AND
> SN:79* NOT (GS:*) seemed to be a good starting point - only 9 trademarks to
> review.  Here's a brief summary of those 9 Madrid live filings over 3
> months old without GS text entries on Trademark Search (decreasing serial
> number order).
>
> #
> SN
> FiledDate
> Date Received
> Comment
> 1
> 79406020
> 2024-07-03
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 2
> 79406014
> 2024-06-17
> 3-Oct-24
> Received last week - no problem.
> 3
> 79405680
> 2024-05-27
> unavailable
> Could not find application on TSDR. WTF?
> 4
> 79402974
> 2024-06-25
> unavailable
> Could not find application on TSDR. WTF?
> 5
> 79400319
> 2024-07-02
> 18-Jul-24
> Well beyond the 7-day processing average. WTF?
> 6
> 79400048
> 2024-05-13
> 18-Jul-24
> Well beyond the 7-day processing average. WTF?
> 7
> 79399924
> 2024-04-11
> 11-Jul-24
> Well beyond the 7-day processing average. WTF?
> 8
> 79397585
> 2024-03-01
> 13-Jun-24
> Well beyond the 7-day processing average. WTF?
> 9
> 79391532
> 2024-01-26
> 14-Mar-24
> Well beyond the 7-day processing average. WTF?
>
> For this first review, 7 of 9 trademarks would have processing failures.
> I was particularly annoyed that I could not view the applications on TSDR
> for hits #3 and #4, but maybe those were temporary TSDR hiccups.  Moving on
> ...
>
> 1B - Non-Madrid applications missing GS entries.
>
> The search LD:true AND FD:[* TO 20240410]   NOT (GS:* SN:(89* 79*) )
> retrieves 23 live non-Madrid filings over 6 months old but having no GS
> text, ignoring the 89-series.  Here's my brief summary (in decreasing
> filing date order) of those 23 older live trademarks with no GS text.
>
> #
> SN
> FiledDate
> Comment
> 1
> 98337844
> 2024-01-01
> Application withdrawn by USPTO before publication ?
> 2
> 98274578
> 2023-11-16
> Maybe no one has noticed the missing GS text?
> 3
> 98102700
> 2023-07-26
> Some activity, but processing largely skipped for this application?
> 4
> 98975170
> 2023-07-12
> Incomplete Divisional?
> 5
> 97874126
> 2023-04-05
> Processing skipped for this application?
> 6
> 97978503
> 2023-01-23
> Maybe no one has noticed the missing GS text?
> 7
> 97978567
> 2022-12-29
> Processing skipped for this application?
> 8
> 97978808
> 2022-11-18
> Processing skipped for this application?
> 9
> 97978301
> 2022-07-27
> Some activity, but processing largely skipped for this application?
> 10
> 76720936
> 2021-11-23
> Madrid converted to national application awaiting processing.
> 11
> 90981207
> 2020-09-24
> Processing skipped for this application?
> 12
> 90981101
> 2020-09-23
> Processing skipped for this application?
> 13
> 76720931
> 2017-09-20
> Madrid converted to national application awaiting processing.
> 14
> 81337716
> 1984-10-15
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 15
> 81161075
> 1979-07-16
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 16
> 81148965
> 1979-05-15
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 17
> 81148938
> 1979-02-01
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 18
> 81144258
> 1978-06-08
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 19
> 81142298
> 1978-04-28
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 20
> 81209948
> 1978-01-01
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 21
> 81119026
> 1977-07-05
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 22
> 81068511
> 1976-05-13
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
> 23
> 81029001
> 1973-08-02
> Dead registration that appears as live on Trademark Search.
>
> In summary, it looks like the USPTO has largely ignored most of these live
> tradmarks with no GS text.  (Also, note that we can only guess how the
> USPTO computes the Pre-Examination Unit wait time, but that calculation
> apparently does NOT include applications that may have been skipped by
> Pre-Exam.)
>
> Well, these first two reviews were too frustrating to continue with the
> proposed reviews of older live trademarks with the UNKNOWN mark drawing
> code (since Pre-Exam determines the mark drawing code for new
> applications).  Maybe I'll perform that analysis later today.
>
> Happy Trademarking,
> Ken Boone
>
> ________________________________
> From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> on behalf of
> Jessica R Murray via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 1:34 PM
> To: 'e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com' <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Cc: Jessica R Murray <jrmurray at syr.edu>
> Subject: [E-trademarks] Pre-Examination Unit wait time
>
>
>
>
> Hi.  Does anyone have any insight into what?s going on at the
> Pre-Examination Unit, with a target 10-day wait time and a current (as of
> August) average 131-day wait time?
>
>
>
> [A screenshot of a computer  Description automatically generated]
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jessica
>
>
>
> Jessica R. Murray
> (pronouns she/her/hers)
> Director, Transactional Law Clinic
> Associate Teaching Professor
> Syracuse University College of Law
>
>
>
> Zoom Link  https://syracuseuniversity.zoom.us/my/jessica.r.murray
>
>
> T 315.443.4582  F 315.443.3636
> jrmurray at syr.edu<mailto:jrmurray at syr.edu>
>
> Dineen Hall, 950 Irving Ave., Syracuse, NY 13244
> law.syr.edu
>
> Syracuse University
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241010/266fa883/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image003.jpg
> Type: image/jpeg
> Size: 25433 bytes
> Desc: image003.jpg
> URL: <
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241010/266fa883/attachment-0001.jpg
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of E-trademarks Digest, Vol 12, Issue 10
> ********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241011/cb7fb6ce/attachment.htm>