[E-trademarks] Recording assignment with redactions

[Thilo C. Agthe]

I have done exactly what other colleagues have suggested.  Redact liberally, making sure only the operative language showing the assignment and the schedule listing the marks remains.

Best regards,

Thilo C. Agthe

WUERSCH & GERING
Thilo C. Agthe, Partner
Wuersch & Gering LLP | 100 Wall Street, 10th Fl. | New York, NY 10005
212-509-4714 (direct) | 212-509-5050 (firm)
thilo.agthe at wg-law.com<mailto:thilo.agthe at wg-law.com> | www.wg-law.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.wg-law.com&c=E,1,CWoeRVQhtGs121LAVIh7zU1-dx3iVrghVXYSNSKabu2gys3XF-T4ZebqmeopXQ1xZCNj4u5_DxhXvfueoeFMVmprC0L4rGxGcSgyirWqdfa_AwkM&typo=1&ancr_add=1>

This message and any attachments hereto contain confidential information and information which may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. It is intended for the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.

Diese Nachricht und etwaige Anhänge enthalten vertrauliche Informationen und Daten, die Gegenstand des Anwaltsgeheimnisses sein können. Sie ist nur für die oben genannte natürliche oder juristische Person gedacht. Sollten Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Empfänger sein, bitten wir Sie die Nachricht nicht zu lesen, zu kopieren, oder an andere weiterzugeben.  Bitte informieren Sie den Absender durch Beantwortung dieser Nachricht, und löschen Sie die Nachricht aus Ihrem System. Danke.

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail!

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Laura Geyer via E-trademarks
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 12:42 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Laura Geyer <lgeyer at ndgallilaw.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Recording assignment with redactions


[CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL]
In the pileon, I have sometimes filed as little as


  1.  First page with everything blacked out instead of the parties, some of the whereas-es, and the granting language.
  2.  The signature page
  3.  The trademark schedule

That’s it!

Laura Talley Geyer | Of Counsel

ND Galli Law LLC
1200 G Street, N.W., Ste 800
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: (202) 599-9019 (direct)
https://ndgallilaw.com/laura-geyer/
https://ndgallilaw.com/

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> On Behalf Of David Boundy via E-trademarks
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 6:54 AM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: David Boundy <DavidBoundyEsq at gmail.com<mailto:DavidBoundyEsq at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Recording assignment with redactions

EXTERNAL EMAIL
Redact away as liberally as you like.  Select pages.  Black out all but the transfer itself.  Remember that recordation is only about notice, it's not the legally effective transfer.  That's why the short form recordation works.   There's nothing different here.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024, 4:56 PM Robert Reynolds via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:
Afternoon, all.

                Got a situation where we represent a transferee who bought a few trademarks from another company many years ago. The proprietor has died and the company has been dissolved by its state of formation. The transfer document doesn’t have the typical schedule made for submission with the USPTO that omits the sensitive information that the general public needn’t see, and there’s no one left to sign a new recordation document referencing the original transfer agreement.

I’d like to avoid submitting the entirety of the transfer agreement, if possible. My initial thought was light redactions to the most sensitive information, but I’m not finding guidance in TMEP §500 if this is allowed. Anyone handle a similar situation in the past?

Bob Reynolds
Senior Counsel
Klintworth & Rozenblat IP LLP
2045 W. Grand Ave, Ste B PMB 84396
Chicago, Illinois 60612
direct 773.770-2554  fax 773.570.3328
rreynolds at kandrip.com<mailto:rreynolds at kandrip.com>
www.kandrip.com<http://www.kandrip.com/>

________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
________________________________

--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241017/9fc52056/attachment.html>