[E-trademarks] Registration of Same Mark by Sister Companies
Pamela Chestek
pamela at chesteklegal.com
Tue Oct 29 19:34:22 UTC 2024
1201.07(b)(iii) When the Record Does Not Support a Presumption of Unity
of Control
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024, 2:34 PM Crane, Susan via E-trademarks <
e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
> That Company A and Company B are under common control is not enough to
> show no likelihood of confusion. It is not even enough to show use by a
> related company for purposes of the use of one inuring to the benefit of
> the other.
>
>
>
> I would draft a robust coexistence agreement addressing as many of the
> factors listed in TMEP 1207.01(d)(viii) as possible:
>
>
>
> - 1) Whether the consent shows an agreement between both parties;
> - (2) Whether the agreement includes a clear indication that the goods
> and/or services travel in separate trade channels;
> - (3) Whether the parties agree to restrict their fields of use;
> - (4) Whether the parties will make efforts to prevent confusion, and
> cooperate and take steps to avoid any confusion that may arise in the
> future; and
> - (5) Whether the marks have been used for a period of time without
> evidence of actual confusion.
>
>
>
> And then submit that.
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/22+Sylvan+Way+%0D%0A+Parsippany,+NJ+07054?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
> *Susan L. Crane*
>
> *Group Vice President, Legal*
>
> *Intellectual Property, Brands & Marketing*
>
>
>
> Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
>
> 22 Sylvan Way
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/22+Sylvan+Way+%0D%0A+Parsippany,+NJ+07054?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> Parsippany, NJ 07054
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/22+Sylvan+Way+%0D%0A+Parsippany,+NJ+07054?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> *O* (973) 753-6455
>
> *M* (973) 879-3420
>
> Susan.Crane at wyndham.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Scott Landsbaum via E-trademarks
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 29, 2024 12:47 PM
> *To:* for trademark practitioners <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> *Cc:* Scott Landsbaum <scott at scottlandsbaum.com>
> *Subject:* [E-trademarks] Registration of Same Mark by Sister Companies
>
>
>
> Hello Listmates, I am a little puzzled about the correct document to file
> with the examiner in the following situation: Client directly owns two
> sister companies A and B. Each company registered Mark in different but
> related classes. Unfortunately,
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>
> *This Message Is From an External Sender *
>
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
>
> * Report Suspicious *
> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!ksaLCl6uwGlx74q6MlOocPesfPrYc5o2Zu20Vs3o7ItD08pQyQyOGbkhCmRrlssDP93WYSdchrvR7BHCDeQgqXajxJvdoMp1TyRc33OSu7rcvO04m6AryCOH9LM1Dg$>
>
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>
> Hello Listmates, I am a little puzzled about the correct document to file
> with the examiner in the following situation:
>
>
>
> Client directly owns two sister companies A and B. Each company
> registered Mark in different but related classes. Unfortunately, company A
> allowed its registration to expire and had to apply for a new registration
> for Mark. The examiner is citing company B's registration in refusing
> company A's re-application. To overcome this refusal, is it enough to file
> a document stating that company A and B are under common control, or do I
> need to state that one company is the licensee of the other, or even file a
> co-existence agreement?
>
>
>
> Client has its reasons for setting it up this way, so reorganizing the
> ownership of each registration isn't on the table.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> Scott Landsbaum, Inc.
>
> 323-314-7881 / f 323-714-2454
>
> 8306 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 420,
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/8306+Wilshire+Blvd.,+Suite+420,+Beverly+Hills,+CA+90211?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Beverly Hills, CA
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/8306+Wilshire+Blvd.,+Suite+420,+Beverly+Hills,+CA+90211?entry=gmail&source=g>
> 90211
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/8306+Wilshire+Blvd.,+Suite+420,+Beverly+Hills,+CA+90211?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> www.scottlandsbaum.com
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.scottlandsbaum.com/__;!!Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!l8agCKaFkKNacsNCFkuQQfVzJ40-rM9ynXs4oT_NNM1_D6vFJDvVN37bnGA_cSINBgIMY4dWtVUxRPQ3TOJ3-Bm9hbLmtZo$>
> / www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/__;!!Nf401RNTQFE14GfWW3o!l8agCKaFkKNacsNCFkuQQfVzJ40-rM9ynXs4oT_NNM1_D6vFJDvVN37bnGA_cSINBgIMY4dWtVUxRPQ3TOJ3-Bm9obCEX6c$>
>
> NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the individual or individuals
> to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential attorney-client
> privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please do not read, forward, print, copy or distribute
> it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and
> notify us by return email or by telephone at (323) 314-7881
> <%28323%29%20314-7881>.
>
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any discussion of tax matters contained in
> this or any email (including any attachments) or in any oral
> or other written communication is not intended to be used and cannot be
> used for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax related penalties or in
> connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation of any of the
> matters addressed in the communication.
> This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message. Unless otherwise indicated in
> the body of this email, nothing in this communication is intended to
> operate as an electronic signature and this transmission cannot be used to
> form, document, or authenticate a contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
> and/or its affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email
> communications in the United States, including the content of emails and
> attachments, for security, legal compliance, training, quality assurance
> and other purposes.
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241029/ee8956b3/attachment.html>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list