[E-trademarks] Case saying consumers can distinguish adult vs family products?

Cumbow, Bob Robert.Cumbow at millernash.com
Wed Apr 23 19:20:44 UTC 2025


Scott,

Not sure it’s the one you’re looking for but Wreal v. Amazon, 38 F.4th 114 (11th Cir. 2022) might be of help—reverse confusion case brought by porn company that first used the trademark FIRE TV against Amazon’s more famous introduction of home viewing software under the same name.

Bob


Bob
 Cumbow
Partner
Miller Nash LLP

605 5th Ave S, Ste 900 | Seattle, WA 98104
Direct: 206.777.7468 | 
Cell: 425.443.0990 | 
Office: 206.624.8300
Email | 
Bio | 
Insights
 | 
Website

Our attorneys regularly offer insights to address the challenges faced by our clients. To visit the Miller Nash industry-focused blog overview page on our updated website: please click this link. 

--------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the email. Instead, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or telephoning us. Thank you.
--------------------------------------
From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Scott Landsbaum via E-trademarks
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 11:28 AM
To: for trademark practitioners <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Scott Landsbaum <scott at scottlandsbaum.com>
Subject: [E-trademarks] Case saying consumers can distinguish adult vs family products?


[EXTERNAL MESSAGE: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.]

________________________________
Hi Team, Is anyone aware of any authority saying that consumers understand that family entertainment and products using the same mark as adult entertainment and products come from different sources (or vice versa)?  We are the family entertainment.
Thanks.

Regards,
Scott

Scott Landsbaum, Inc.
323-314-7881<tel:323-314-7881> / f 323-714-2454
8306 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 420, Beverly Hills, CA  90211
www.scottlandsbaum.com<http://www.scottlandsbaum.com> / www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum/<https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottlandsbaum>

NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, forward, print, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains.  Please delete it immediately and notify us by return email or by telephone at (323) 314-7881<tel:%28323%29%20314-7881>.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any discussion of tax matters contained in this or any email (including any attachments) or in any oral or other written communication is not intended to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax related penalties or in connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation of any of the matters addressed in the communication.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250423/7351188b/attachment.html>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list