[E-trademarks] Domicile Address

[Thilo C. Agthe]

I have run into this issue, exactly like you described.  In my case, a phone call to the examiner, with a follow-up email explaining that the location is a multi-office structure with a single-entry location for everyone who uses the location, resolved the issue.

Best wishes,

Thilo C. Agthe


WUERSCH & GERING
Thilo C. Agthe, Partner
Wuersch & Gering LLP | 100 Wall Street, 10th Fl. | New York, NY 10005
212-509-4714 (direct) | 212-509-5050 (firm)
thilo.agthe at wg-law.com<mailto:thilo.agthe at wg-law.com> | www.wg-law.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.wg-law.com&c=E,1,CWoeRVQhtGs121LAVIh7zU1-dx3iVrghVXYSNSKabu2gys3XF-T4ZebqmeopXQ1xZCNj4u5_DxhXvfueoeFMVmprC0L4rGxGcSgyirWqdfa_AwkM&typo=1&ancr_add=1>

This message and any attachments hereto contain confidential information and information which may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. It is intended for the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.

Diese Nachricht und etwaige Anhänge enthalten vertrauliche Informationen und Daten, die Gegenstand des Anwaltsgeheimnisses sein können. Sie ist nur für die oben genannte natürliche oder juristische Person gedacht. Sollten Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Empfänger sein, bitten wir Sie die Nachricht nicht zu lesen, zu kopieren, oder an andere weiterzugeben.  Bitte informieren Sie den Absender durch Beantwortung dieser Nachricht, und löschen Sie die Nachricht aus Ihrem System. Danke.

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail!

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Louis Levy via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 11:42 AM
To: Kevin Grierson via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Louis Levy <llevy at symbus.com>
Subject: [E-trademarks] Domicile Address


[CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL]
We provided the address of a company HQ as a business address.  It is an office in a multi-dwelling commercial building.  The Examiner "the address does not identify applicant's principal place of business" and is requiring a "domicile address."

Has anyone run into this kind of thing before? Is the PTO randomly questioning legitimate office addresses if they are in multi-dwelling buildings?

Thanks.

Louis J. Levy | Attorney
Symbus Law Group PLLC
1775 I Street, NW, Suite 1150 * Washington, DC 20006
Direct:  240.453.9211* Mobile:  202.258.6547
llevy at symbus.com<mailto:eraynes at symbus.com%0dwww.symbus.com> * www.symbus.com<mailto:eraynes at symbus.com%0dwww.symbus.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250429/5a2a04c7/attachment.html>