[E-trademarks] Proud Boys trademark

[Miriam Richter, Esq.]

I know we are not political on this site but my brain seems to have rebooted because I have a zillion quick comebacks to the goodwill comment – LOL!!!!!

Best,
Miriam

Miriam Richter, Attorney at Law, P.L.
Make Your Mark! ®
Trademark, Copyright, and other Intellectual Property Matters
2312 Wilton Drive, Suite 9
Wilton Manors, Florida 33305

954-977-4711 office
954-240-8819 cell
954-977-4717 facsimile

NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-240-8819 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or anyattachments may not have been produced by the sender.


From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of asarabia2 via E-trademarks
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 11:43 AM
To: e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
Cc: asarabia2 <asarabia2 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Proud Boys trademark


Lot's of questions about the validity of any assignment.  Goodwill involved?  Or did the court just issue an order without regard to that?
On 2/7/2025 9:34 AM, Julia Anne Matheson via E-trademarks wrote:
It’s absurd.  I’m seeing it too.  Makes no sense at all.

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com><mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Miriam Richter, Esq. via E-trademarks
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 12:29 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com><mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Miriam Richter, Esq. <mrichter at richtertrademarks.com><mailto:mrichter at richtertrademarks.com>
Subject: [E-trademarks] Proud Boys trademark


WARNING: External email, do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender’s full email address and expect the attachments.
All,

I’ve had a crazy week so it is possible that I’m missing something really basic here because my brain is fried, but, how is an historic Black church in DC going to own the trademark? How will they show use? I found four pending applications and no registrations. All four are owned by different individuals/companies and all but one are 1b.

How can the trademark PROUD BOYS indicate a Black church as the source of the goods/services being provided? Is this a common law trademark thing?

Does anyone have access to the opinion?

Best,
Miriam


Miriam Richter, Attorney at Law, P.L.
Make Your Mark! ®
Trademark, Copyright, and other Intellectual Property Matters
2312 Wilton Drive, Suite 9
Wilton Manors, Florida 33305

954-977-4711 office
954-240-8819 cell
954-977-4717 facsimile

NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-240-8819 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or anyattachments may not have been produced by the sender.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250207/fa772797/attachment.html>