[E-trademarks] Trademark Employee Exodus? No Evidence So Far
Carl Oppedahl
carl at oppedahl.com
Thu Feb 13 20:38:14 UTC 2025
Thank you for posting. It will be very interesting to see how this
changes over the next few months.
On 2/13/2025 1:09 PM, Ken Boone via E-trademarks wrote:
> Pardon me for reviving (briefly) an ugly topic, but ...
>
> On 29 Jan, I exported from the USPTO's employee locator all the L
> offices (which were primarily the Trademark Law Offices). Today, I
> understand the /Fork in the Road/ is closed - that federal employees
> can no longer accept the deferred retirement proposed by the new
> administration, so I repeated the export performed on 29 Jan. Below is
> a summary of current L office employee counts. Only a few changes are
> noted, but who knows what a similar check performed next week might
> show? (A positive change means an increase of employees; a negative
> change means a decrease of employees. Protecting privacy, I'm not
> interested in checking actual names for changes.)
>
> Good news so far, as I see only a net loss of 1 employee for all
> trademark L offices (that is, so far, there is no evidence of mass
> exits by the deferred retirement offer among the Trademark Law
> Offices, but this is an early look at the data).
>
> *2/13 Counts*
>
>
> Office
>
>
> Office Description
>
>
> *Change*
> 16
>
>
> T/LL
>
>
> TRADEMARK LAW LIBRARY
>
>
> 30
>
>
> T/LO101
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 101
>
>
> 15
>
>
> T/LO102
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 102
>
>
> 29
>
>
> T/LO103
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 103
>
>
> 27
>
>
> T/LO104
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 104
>
>
> 26
>
>
> T/LO105
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 105
>
>
> 1
> 29
>
>
> T/LO106
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 106
>
>
> 28
>
>
> T/LO107
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 107
>
>
> 29
>
>
> T/LO108
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 108
>
>
> 31
>
>
> T/LO109
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 109
>
>
> 29
>
>
> T/LO110
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 110
>
>
> 25
>
>
> T/LO111
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 111
>
>
> 29
>
>
> T/LO112
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 112
>
>
> 23
>
>
> T/LO113
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 113
>
>
> 25
>
>
> T/LO114
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 114
>
>
> 27
>
>
> T/LO115
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 115
>
>
> -1
> 29
>
>
> T/LO116
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 116
>
>
> 27
>
>
> T/LO117
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 117
>
>
> 15
>
>
> T/LO118
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 118
>
>
> 15
>
>
> T/LO119
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 119
>
>
> 28
>
>
> T/LO120
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 120
>
>
> 26
>
>
> T/LO121
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 121
>
>
> 24
>
>
> T/LO122
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 122
>
>
> 27
>
>
> T/LO123
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 123
>
>
> 14
>
>
> T/LO124
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 124
>
>
> 29
>
>
> T/LO125
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 125
>
>
> -1
> 30
>
>
> T/LO126
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 126
>
>
> 1
> 27
>
>
> T/LO127
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 127
>
>
> 30
>
>
> T/LO128
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 128
>
>
> 28
>
>
> T/LO129
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 129
>
>
> 17
>
>
> T/LO130
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 130
>
>
> 15
>
>
> T/LO131
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 131
>
>
> 14
>
>
> T/LO132
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 132
>
>
> 16
>
>
> T/LO133
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 133
>
>
> 2
>
>
> T/LO300
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 300
>
>
> 17
>
>
> T/LO301
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 301
>
>
> 16
>
>
> T/LO302
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 302
>
>
> 17
>
>
> T/LO303
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 303
>
>
> 17
>
>
> T/LO304
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 304
>
>
> 10
>
>
> T/LO800
>
>
> LAW OFFICE 800
>
>
> 13
>
>
> T/LP
>
>
> LEGAL POLICY OFFICE
>
>
> -1
>
>
>
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%,
> Ken Boone
>
> PS - UDUPA VAISHALI is still shown as COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250213/10cd8539/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250213/10cd8539/attachment.p7s>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list