[E-trademarks] Some Quality Control Checks/Suggestions Using Trademark Search
Rebecca Brandau
rebecca at brandaulaw.com
Wed Feb 19 04:26:59 UTC 2025
Wow. Thank you for all your work on this. What a mess, or am I over-reacting? Either way, I am glad to know you are watching out. I have the highest regard for your skills.
All the best,
Becky Brandau,
/Rebecca J. Brandau, Esq./
Brandau & Associates, LLC
1960 N. Ridge Rd.
Vermilion, OH 44089
314-973-8669 Mobile
440-986-1833 Office
Rebecca at BrandauLaw.com mailto:Rebecca at BrandauLaw.comhttp://www.BrandauLaw.com
Licensed in Missouri and Ohio
> On 02/18/2025 8:33 AM EST Ken Boone via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com> wrote:
>
>
> FYI - Today's disappointing QC report for the USPTO.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> From: Ken Boone <boondogles at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 7:31 AM
> To: TMFeedback <tmfeedback at uspto.gov>
> Subject: Some Quality Control Checks/Suggestions Using Trademark Search
>
> With today's update (the first since last Thursday due to problems on both TM Search and TSDR), I see some small changes for several of the QC searches.
>
> #
>
> QC Search
>
> Today
>
> Originally
>
> Change
> 1
>
> SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) AND MD:unknown AND LD:true
>
> 445
>
> 449
>
> -4
> 2
>
> FD:[* TO 20240630] AND MD:unknown AND LD:true NOT (SN:79* SN:89* )
>
> 70
>
> 79
>
> -9
> 3
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT ON:*
>
> 15
>
> 21
>
> -6
> 4
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT (GS:* SN:89*)
>
> 19
>
> 24
>
> -5
> 5
>
> LD:true NOT FD:* COMMENT:"Live But No Filing Date - 98305614 97977848 97977833"
>
> 4
>
> 3
>
> 1
> 6
>
> LR:true NOT LD:true Comment:"Live Registrations But Actually Dead"
>
> 20
>
> 20
>
> 0
> 7
>
> SN:( 75722562 79090344 79099220 79105611 79107274 79294728 79294737 79310411 79331990 79336276 79366512 79384354 79391101 85333307 86500939 88128956 88629495 90444281 90555410 90979979 97667505 97728652 97975969 98176859 98975063 ) AND LD:true AND WD:*?*
>
> 25
>
> 25
>
> 0
> 8
>
> LD:true AND MD:("1" "3" "4" "5" ) NOT ( WD:* FM:* ) Com:"Missing Wordmark!"
> 99
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since Thursday, a few corrections for searches #2, #3 and #4, though the bulk of the trademarks for the first 4 QC searches are now over 7 months old and still await corrections.
>
> For search #5, there is a new live trademark without a filing date, namely 98703671. Trademark Search shows this application has no GS text or owner data. Checking TSDR, the raw application actually shows no GS text was provided and that the applicant paid $0 (0 class). Clearly this is an informal application, but why would the TC electronic application system even provide this application to be loaded on USPTO systems, and why did it get loaded as a live, pending application instead of as a dead, informal application? This informal application has been at the USPTO for over 6 months but still has the New application awaiting assignment to an examining attorney status on TSDR. Seriously?
>
> Search #8, the new QC search, identifies 99 live trademarks with mark drawing codes 1 (typed drawings), 3 (design & text), 4 (standard characters), or 5 (stylized text), yet these 99 trademarks do NOT have any text for the wordmarks. I had to put quotation marks around the digits 1, 3, 4 & 5 of the search so that Trademark Search would NOT consider those numbers to be back references to prior searches. IMO, those quotation marks should not be necessary, as by context, I was searching the MD search field, not performing back references to prior searches.
>
> Drawings for some of the 99 trademarks like
>
>
>
> clearly have text that should have been included in the wordmarks. Others are missing drawings on Trademark Search. Others have drawing that clearly are design only trademarks, so the mark drawing code 2 would be more appropriate.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Ken Boone
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> From: Ken Boone <boondogles at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 10:23 AM
> To: TMFeedback <tmfeedback at uspto.gov>
> Subject: Some Quality Control Checks/Suggestions Using Trademark Search
>
> With today's update to TM Search, I see some small changes (corrections) for the first 3 QC searches.
>
> #
>
> QC Search
>
> Today
>
> Originally
>
> Change
> 1
>
> SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) AND MD:unknown AND LD:true
>
> 445
>
> 449
>
> 4
> 2
>
> FD:[* TO 20240630] AND MD:unknown AND LD:true NOT (SN:79* SN:89* )
>
> 76
>
> 79
>
> 3
> 3
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT ON:*
>
> 20
>
> 21
>
> 1
> 4
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT (GS:* SN:89*)
>
> 24
>
> 24
>
> 0
> 5
>
> LD:true NOT FD:* COMMENT:"Live But No Filing Date - 98305614 97977848 97977833"
>
> 3
>
> 3
>
> 0
> 6
>
> LR:true NOT LD:true Comment:"Live Registrations But Actually Dead"
>
> 20
>
> 20
>
> 7
>
> SN:( 75722562 79090344 79099220 79105611 79107274 79294728 79294737 79310411 79331990 79336276 79366512 79384354 79391101 85333307 86500939 88128956 88629495 90444281 90555410 90979979 97667505 97728652 97975969 98176859 98975063 ) AND LD:true AND WD:*?*
>
> 25
>
> 25
>
>
> Towards continuous improvement of USPTO quality, I have added two (2) more QC searches.
>
> Search #6 provides the illogical search result that there are 20 live registrations that are dead trademarks by the LD field. By my checks, the LD search field has the correct DEAD status for those 20 trademarks (all older registrations for the 81 series). Apparently something unexpected occurred for the LR (Live Registration) field for these 20 trademarks. Below is a screenshot showing 4 of the 20 trademarks that currently satisfy search #6. (Yes, I wish I could do a copy/paste from Trademark Search {and TSDR} to emails instead of performing screen snapshots to document unexpected search results like this.)
>
>
>
> Search #7 returns 25 trademarks where the wordmark includes at least one question mark (?) where some other character appears in the drawing, so USPTO processing apparently corrupted the wordmark entry. All 25 trademarks are standard character marks chosen randomly from my list of over 270 questionable wordmark entries. From my perspective, the first USPTO task is to correct the wordmark entries, as these wordmark errors could impact LOC searches. An additional USPTO task is to identify and fix whatever processes (or careless personnel) that corrupted the wordmark entries. For your convenience, I provide the following listing of the current wordmarks and my recommended correction to the wordmarks. (Yes, most of these are live registrations.)
>
>
> #
>
> SN
>
> FiledDate
>
> ®
>
> Current Wordmark
>
> Corrected
> 1
>
> 75722562
>
> 1999-06-08
>
> ®
>
> PURET?
>
> PURETÉ
> 2
>
> 79090344
>
> 2010-11-22
>
> ®
>
> MAS MACI?
>
> MAS MACIÁ
> 3
>
> 79099220
>
> 2011-04-15
>
> ®
>
> LA VALL?E
>
> LA VALLÉE
> 4
>
> 79105611
>
> 2011-04-14
>
> ®
>
> WORL?E
>
> WORLÉE
> 5
>
> 79107274
>
> 2011-10-17
>
> ®
>
> K?STROLITH
>
> KÖSTROLITH
> 6
>
> 79294728
>
> 2020-07-22
>
> ®
>
> CL? DE PEAU BEAUT? EXFOLIANT DOUX ?CLAT SUPRÊME
>
> CLÉ DE PEAU BEAUTÉ EXFOLIANT DOUX ÉCLAT SUPRÊME
> 7
>
> 79294737
>
> 2020-07-22
>
> ®
>
> CL? DE PEAU BEAUT? SOIN MASQUE ?CLAT SUPRÊME
>
> CLÉ DE PEAU BEAUTÉ SOIN MASQUE ÉCLAT SUPRÊME
> 8
>
> 79310411
>
> 2021-03-22
>
> ®
>
> O?LOCK
>
> O'LOCK
> 9
>
> 79331990
>
> 2021-12-07
>
> ®
>
> DODONI PLANT?D
>
> DODONI PLANT'D
> 10
>
> 79336276
>
> 2021-12-10
>
> ®
>
> VACOM ? WE SUPPLY FUTURE
>
> VACOM – WE SUPPLY FUTURE
> 11
>
> 79366512
>
> 2023-01-01
>
> ®
>
> DON?T JUST TALK. SYNCH
>
> DON'T JUST TALK. SYNCH
> 12
>
> 79384354
>
> 2023-06-28
>
> SYREN?S CALL FOR RICHES
>
> SYREN’S CALL FOR RICHES
> 13
>
> 79391101
>
> 2023-10-18
>
> ®
>
> RESPIN ?EM IN
>
> RESPIN ‘EM IN
> 14
>
> 85333307
>
> 2011-05-30
>
> ®
>
> METAL?RGICA HASSMANN
>
> METALÚRGICA HASSMANN
> 15
>
> 86500939
>
> 2015-01-12
>
> ®
>
> ?BER
>
> ÜBER
> 16
>
> 88128956
>
> 2018-09-24
>
> ®
>
> FL?NEUR
>
> FLÂNEUR
> 17
>
> 88629495
>
> 2019-09-24
>
> ®
>
> ?Y LAS TORTILLAS ?
>
> ¿Y LAS TORTILLAS ?
> 18
>
> 90444281
>
> 2021-01-01
>
> ®
>
> LEK?L, LEGLIZ, LAKAY.
>
> LEKÒL, LEGLIZ, LAKAY.
> 19
>
> 90555410
>
> 2021-03-02
>
> XR360?
>
> XR360º
> 20
>
> 90979979
>
> 2021-04-29
>
> ®
>
> ATTACH?
>
> ATTACHÉ
> 21
>
> 97667505
>
> 2022-11-08
>
> HOUSE OF L?ON
>
> HOUSE OF LÉON
> 22
>
> 97728652
>
> 2022-12-22
>
> X?PORT
>
> X°PORT
> 23
>
> 97975969
>
> 2021-10-27
>
> ®
>
> KLEMAN CL?ON MANUFACTURE
>
> KLEMAN CLÉON MANUFACTURE
> 24
>
> 98176859
>
> 2023-09-12
>
> ®
>
> ALLIR?G
>
> ALLIRŌG
> 25
>
> 98975063
>
> 2023-06-05
>
> VOTRE CH?TEAU BY PHINEAS GREYE
>
> VOTRE CHÂTEAU BY PHINEAS GREYE
>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Ken Boone
> USPTO IT Specialist (Retired)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> From: Ken Boone <boondogles at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 4:47 AM
> To: TMFeedback <tmfeedback at uspto.gov>
> Subject: Re: Some Quality Control Checks/Suggestions Using Trademark Search
>
> Yesterday, I provided 4 Quality Control checks using Trademark Search.
>
> Today, I repeated the 4 searches plus a new QC search and the trademarks retrieved. The new search retrieves live trademarks having no filing date. There were no changes with today's update to Trademark Search.
>
>
>
>
>
> Date Search Performed
> #
>
> QC Search
>
> 02/11/25
>
> 02/12/25
> 1
>
> SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) AND MD:unknown AND LD:true
>
> 449
>
> 449
> 2
>
> FD:[* TO 20240630] AND MD:unknown AND LD:true NOT (SN:79* SN:89* )
>
> 79
>
> 79
> 3
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT ON:*
>
> 21
>
> 21
> 4
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT (GS:* SN:89*)
>
> 24
>
> 24
> 5
>
> LD:true NOT FD:* COMMENT:"Live But No Filing Date"
>
> 3
>
> 3
>
> Following is a snapshot from Trademark Search of the results for the 5th search. The 3 trademarks appear to be noise in the search database, so the LIVE PENDING status likely should be corrected to DEAD, but I haven't researched the specific problems of these 3 serial number records too deeply. But if these trademarks are LIVE PENDING (as currently indicated on Trademark Search), the drawings are suspiciously blank and the both 97977848 & 97977833 are void of data. Clearly, errors are evident in these 3 LIVE PENDING trademarks.
>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Ken Boone
> USPTO IT Specialist (Retired)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> From: Ken Boone <boondogles at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 12:37 PM
> To: TMFeedback <tmfeedback at uspto.gov>
> Subject: Some Quality Control Checks/Suggestions Using Trademark Search
>
> Below are some quality control suggestions based on unexpected results using Trademark Search.
>
> The USPTO currently indicates We are currently examining new applications submitted between: July 01, 2024 - July 15, 2024. From that, I infer that Pre-Exam has completed their initial processing for all new applications file prior to July 1, 2024, so that all those applications would be ready for examination.
> ____________________
>
> For Madrid applications, 79398813 appears to be the last serial number delivered 27 June 2024, so I expected that the search
>
> SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) AND MD:unknown AND LD:true
>
> would fail to retrieve any trademarks - that all live Madrid applications for serial numbers 79000000 through 79398813 would have valid mark drawing code entries, not the 0 - UNKNOWN MARK DRAWING TYPE entry as displayed on TSDR (as Trademark Search currently does not display the mark drawing code).
>
> Unfortunately, that search currently retrieves 449 live Madrid applications, indicating that Pre-Exam has not performed their initial processing for 449 live Madrid applications received at the USPTO prior to July 1, 2024.
>
> Are examining attorneys expected to examine Madrid applications that have not been reviewed by Pre-Exam and likely require wordmark corrections, valid mark drawing codes, pseudomarks and possibly design search codes?
>
> I expect 449 Madrid applications are far more than you care to see now, so I'll only list the 25 lowest serial numbers*, as they have been at the USPTO the longest. But simply copy/paste the search provided to Trademark Search to retrieve the full list of 449 older Madrid applications having the UNKNOWN mark drawing code.
>
> #
>
> Serial #
>
> FiledDate
>
> Wordmark
> 1
>
> 79382531
>
> 2023-07-17
>
> 2
>
> 79390295
>
> 2024-01-29
> STEP UP NUTRITION
> 3
>
> 79390627
>
> 2024-02-06
> CLAUDE MONTANA
> 4
>
> 79390628
>
> 2024-02-06
> MONTANA
> 5
>
> 79390629
>
> 2024-01-18
>
> 6
>
> 79390630
>
> 2024-01-17
> 2BE
> 7
>
> 79390631
>
> 2024-01-26
> FAST RETAILING
> 8
>
> 79390632
>
> 2024-01-25
> GOOD MORNING UNIVERSE
> 9
>
> 79390634
>
> 2024-01-26
> FAST RETAILING
> 10
>
> 79390635
>
> 2024-01-15
> NATURAL CODE
> 11
>
> 79390639
>
> 2024-01-22
> PKG
> 12
>
> 79390640
>
> 2024-02-09
>
> 13
>
> 79390641
>
> 2024-02-06
>
> 14
>
> 79390642
>
> 2024-01-26
> EX DRY-EX
> 15
>
> 79390643
>
> 2024-01-26
> UNIQLOCK
> 16
>
> 79390645
>
> 2024-02-06
>
> 17
>
> 79390647
>
> 2024-01-30
>
> 18
>
> 79390648
>
> 2024-01-26
> WEAREX
> 19
>
> 79390649
>
> 2024-02-02
>
> 20
>
> 79390650
>
> 2024-02-05
>
> 21
>
> 79390651
>
> 2024-02-06
>
> 22
>
> 79390652
>
> 2024-02-06
> VICAFE
> 23
>
> 79390654
>
> 2024-02-06
>
> 24
>
> 79390655
>
> 2024-02-06
>
> 25
>
> 79390656
>
> 2024-02-01
>
>
> * This list was exported from Trademark Search. Some wordmark entries on TSDR are not included on Trademark Search for trademarks having the UNKNOWN mark drawing code.
>
> Basically, I used the criteria that the searches provided concentrate on live trademarks received prior to July 1, 2024.
>
> ____________________
>
> For US applications, I expected the search
>
> FD:[* TO 20240630] AND MD:unknown AND LD:true NOT (SN:79* SN:89* )
>
> would fail to retrieve any trademarks - that all live US applications filed prior to July 1, 2024, would have valid mark drawing code entries, not the 0 - UNKNOWN MARK DRAWING TYPE entry as displayed on TSDR.
>
> Unfortunately, that search currently retrieves 79 live trademarks, where one of those trademarks has already progressed to registration.
>
> Are examining attorneys expected to examine applications that have not been reviewed by Pre-Exam and likely require wordmark corrections, valid mark drawing codes, pseudomarks and possibly design search codes?
>
> I'll only list the 25 oldest serial numbers*, where the first is the US application that has already progressed to registration (though it still lacks a valid mark drawing code).
>
> #
>
> Serial #
>
> FiledDate
>
> Wordmark
> 1
>
> 76140440
>
> 2000-10-05
> IRINOX
> 2
>
> 97742991
>
> 2023-01-05
> FLIPSHOPCART
> 3
>
> 98183254
>
> 2023-09-16
> AESVANITOP
> 4
>
> 98183363
>
> 2023-09-17
> SHUYE
> 5
>
> 98185711
>
> 2023-09-18
> HOPLITO
> 6
>
> 98670609
>
> 2023-12-20
>
> 7
>
> 98346587
>
> 2024-01-08
>
> 8
>
> 98377127
>
> 2024-01-26
> GLAM LIFE PARTY BUS
> 9
>
> 98483445
>
> 2024-04-04
> FRESHNOUS
> 10
>
> 98481384
>
> 2024-04-05
> Q-RUN
> 11
>
> 98490255
>
> 2024-04-09
> HORIZON OPTIX
> 12
>
> 98505702
>
> 2024-04-17
>
> 13
>
> 98506234
>
> 2024-04-18
> BALDKNOBBER ARMAMENT
> 14
>
> 98511473
>
> 2024-04-21
> FLEE TO WILD
> 15
>
> 98511500
>
> 2024-04-21
> VENTUSONUS
> 16
>
> 98514481
>
> 2024-04-23
> P PROTECTIMUS
> 17
>
> 98514485
>
> 2024-04-23
> STANDPOINT
> 18
>
> 98518754
>
> 2024-04-25
>
> 19
>
> 98519780
>
> 2024-04-25
>
> 20
>
> 98538540
>
> 2024-05-07
>
> 21
>
> 98550251
>
> 2024-05-14
> M
> 22
>
> 98550897
>
> 2024-05-14
>
> 23
>
> 98559606
>
> 2024-05-20
>
> 24
>
> 98559803
>
> 2024-05-20
> LOS INCOMPARABLES DE TIJUANA
> 25
>
> 98562810
>
> 2024-05-22
> XENIES
>
> ____________________
>
> The search
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT ON:*
>
> retrieves older live trademarks without owner names, an indication that some error must have occurred in USPTO processing. Obviously, no trademarks are expected to be retrieved by this search, but this search currently retrieves 21 live trademarks. Clearly, corrections are warranted.
>
> #
>
> Serial #
>
> FiledDate
>
> Wordmark
> 1
>
> 90981101
>
> 2020-09-23
>
> 2
>
> 90981207
>
> 2020-09-24
> INNOVATIVE CARE SOLUTIONS
> 3
>
> 79325618
>
> 2021-09-29
>
> 4
>
> 97978808
>
> 2022-11-18
>
> 5
>
> 97978567
>
> 2022-12-29
>
> 6
>
> 97978503
>
> 2023-01-23
> AXE DEVTOOLS
> 7
>
> 79416400
>
> 2023-10-20
>
> 8
>
> 79390582
>
> 2023-11-06
> POLIFORM
> 9
>
> 79390588
>
> 2023-11-29
> SUNSHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
> 10
>
> 79390589
>
> 2023-12-13
> JJ VODKA
> 11
>
> 79391532
>
> 2024-01-26
>
> 12
>
> 79416480
>
> 2024-03-27
>
> 13
>
> 79399924
>
> 2024-04-11
>
> 14
>
> 79416404
>
> 2024-05-02
>
> 15
>
> 79415504
>
> 2024-05-16
>
> 16
>
> 79415683
>
> 2024-05-21
>
> 17
>
> 79405680
>
> 2024-05-27
>
> 18
>
> 79415793
>
> 2024-06-12
>
> 19
>
> 79415688
>
> 2024-06-24
>
> 20
>
> 79416506
>
> 2024-06-24
>
> 21
>
> 79402974
>
> 2024-06-25
>
>
>
> ____________________
>
> Every trademark should have GS entries, but the search
>
> (SN:( /<79000000-79398813>/ ) OR (FD:[* TO 20240630])) AND LD:true NOT (GS:* SN:89*)
>
> retrieves 24 older live trademarks without GS entries on Trademark Search. Clearly something went wrong in the processings of these trademarks (and some of these trademarks appeared in previous lists).
>
>
> #
>
> Serial #
>
> FiledDate
>
> Wordmark
> 1
>
> 86984664
>
> 2013-09-23
> THE HYPOCRITE
> 2
>
> 90981101
>
> 2020-09-23
>
> 3
>
> 90981207
>
> 2020-09-24
> INNOVATIVE CARE SOLUTIONS
> 4
>
> 97978301
>
> 2022-07-27
> V VENDR
> 5
>
> 97978808
>
> 2022-11-18
>
> 6
>
> 97978567
>
> 2022-12-29
>
> 7
>
> 97978503
>
> 2023-01-23
> AXE DEVTOOLS
> 8
>
> 97874126
>
> 2023-04-05
> HOLLYWOOD BEAUTY SECRETS EXPOSED
> 9
>
> 79416400
>
> 2023-10-20
>
> 10
>
> 98337844
>
> 2024-01-01
> THE TASTE FROM OUTER SPACE
> 11
>
> 79391532
>
> 2024-01-26
>
> 12
>
> 79416480
>
> 2024-03-27
>
> 13
>
> 79399924
>
> 2024-04-11
>
> 14
>
> 79416404
>
> 2024-05-02
>
> 15
>
> 79415504
>
> 2024-05-16
>
> 16
>
> 79415683
>
> 2024-05-21
>
> 17
>
> 79405680
>
> 2024-05-27
>
> 18
>
> 79415793
>
> 2024-06-12
>
> 19
>
> 98606466
>
> 2024-06-18
>
> 20
>
> 98606904
>
> 2024-06-18
> BROWN SINCE 1993
> 21
>
> 98614079
>
> 2024-06-22
> MODUHOUZ
> 22
>
> 79415688
>
> 2024-06-24
>
> 23
>
> 79416506
>
> 2024-06-24
>
> 24
>
> 79402974
>
> 2024-06-25
>
>
> ____________________
>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Ken Boone
> USPTO IT Specialist (Retired)
> --
> E-trademarks mailing list
> E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com
> http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250218/bcc47dfc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 43511 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250218/bcc47dfc/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 38181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250218/bcc47dfc/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 53029 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250218/bcc47dfc/attachment-0002.png>
More information about the E-trademarks
mailing list