[E-trademarks] E-trademarks Digest, Vol 16, Issue 25

[asarabia2]

But licensing is to third parties in the same way that shopping is to 
third parties. In the latter, the trademark owner is the shop owner and 
selling its own goods to shoppers. In the former, the trademark owner is 
the licensor doing deals with other companies.

On 2/26/2025 11:54 AM, Diane Gardner via E-trademarks wrote:
> But Kevin, the retail services (regardless of whose goods are being sold) are provided to retail shoppers, a.k.a. "others."
>
> If I cannot silently include the words "for others" after a proposed identification, it usually isn't a registrable service. For example, my pharma clients often propose reciting some kind of in-house research activities. But those activities are not offered to third parties, they simply support the in-house development of the eventual goods that will be recited/branded.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Diane L. Gardner
> Reg. No. 36,518
> _____________________________________________________________
> Please note our new corporate address as of February 1, 2023:
> Mastermind IP Law P.C., 440 N. Barranca Ave. #6387, Covina, CA 91723
> 760.294.5160 tel. 706.955.9666 tel. 803.226.0741 tel.  ▪diane at mmip.com  e-mail
> CA Lic. No. 196214   DC Lic. No. 470855   USPTO Reg. No. 36518
>
> Please note our expedited mail processing address as of February 1, 2023:
> Mastermind IP Law P.C., 532 Forest Bluffs Rd., Aiken, SC 29803
> __________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> This communication is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§2510-2521.  It is sent by a law firm for its intended recipient only, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this communication to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone (706) 955-9666 or e-mail reply, delete it from your system, and destroy any hard copy you may have printed.  Absent an executed engagement agreement with Mastermind IP Law P.C., this message does not constitute legal advice, and it does not establish any previously non-existent professional relationship with, or representation of the recipient. Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:44:53 +0000
> From: Kevin Grierson<kgrierson at cm.law>
> To: "For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek
> 	legal advice."<e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
> Cc: Edward Timberlake<ed at timberlakelaw.com>
> Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] Licensing of Intellectual Property Rights?
> Message-ID:
> 	<MN2PR12MB41275D0181688CD56C25961AD2C22 at MN2PR12MB4127.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
> 	
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Interesting that the PTO doesn?t consider the licensing of one?s own IP to be ?licensing of intellectual property,? but one can register ?retail store services? (particularly online ones) when the only products sold are the mark owner?s.
>
>
> Kevin Grierson????
>
> |
>
> Partner
>
> [cid:image001.png at 01DB8833.13C440E0]<https://www.cm.law/>
>
> [Mobile:]
>
>    757-726-7799<tel:757-726-7799>
>
> [Fax:]
>
>    866-521-5663<fax:866-521-5663>
>
> [Email:]
>
>    kgrierson at cm.law<mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>
>
> Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law<https://www.cm.law/cm-law-formerly-culhane-meadows-launches-second-decade-with-fresh-name-and-modern-brand/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20250226/c30271d6/attachment.html>